Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
As long as that doesn't include more disgusting shit like how Autphag has fantasies of being dommed by kids.

Also, someone give me the short version on this David Chac guy and why Aut looks up to him if you don't mind.

Oh God, I'll try but *sigh* ....David Chac is the father figure that Chris felt he never had, he created the cult of Aspergia and a lot of the dodgy stuff like paedophillia stems from David's malignant influence. He later went mad but is still considered by Chris to be the spiritual father of the Aspergian 'movement'.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Chosen Undead
Oh God, I'll try but *sigh* ....David Chac is the father figure that Chris felt he never had, he created the cult of Aspergia and a lot of the dodgy stuff like paedophillia stems from David's malignant influence. He later went mad but is still considered by Chris to be the spiritual father of the Aspergian 'movement'.

So this jackass spoke to Chris' delusions because Chris will go for what he wants to hear over what he needs to hear every time. And since he went crazy Chris would rather do the same then accept he picked the wrong role model.

That explains a lot, and it's very disturbing.
 
So this jackass spoke to Chris' delusions because Chris will go for what he wants to hear over what he needs to hear every time. And since he went crazy Chris would rather do the same then accept he picked the wrong role model.

That explains a lot, and it's very disturbing.

Chris flips on a dime and he is never neutral. Consider his strange affection for Benjamin Nochdrie, which sounded like a royal marriage instead of 2 mates fapping about in the park. He either hates someone or adores them, there's no real in-between.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
It was @Autphag's mother who sealed the deal with Haselgrove in one of their telephone chats regarding his gender transition. She even pleaded with Angela to "fix" his notions of gender dysphoria which is why Haselgrove had such a sudden and distinct shift in regards to treatment options and his non-compliance.
I can't believe 7 people were gullible enough to rate this as informant when I pressured her for an answer, whether in the affirmative or negative, for this very suspicion today.

Relentlessly shouting at her, she kept insisting she wasn't uncomfortable with it.

Someone's lying to me. Either herself, or, as usual, you. Haselgrove's a sociopath who had fictionalized the entity 'Mariette Kidd' (misspelling) who was Clara Harper seeking revenge at time of incident, as a functional theory I have floating around, the fact the constable Fiona Johnson who recorded the assailed's name is stupid anyway notwithstanding.

Has Autphag ever shown any proof that he got the grades that he claimed to have?
I wouldn't have been able to enter 4 HNC programmes only to drop out them without them. Back then it was 1 good Higher and several relevant good S-Grades; they've since bumped the requirements to 2 good Highers and about 5 relevant good S-Grades, probably because so many were wasting time there, taking the piss, and also to better interlink them to normal Universities which require 3 Highers at a minimum but prefer the 5.

A 'good S-Grade' typically meaning a 3 or above; anything beneath that categorically ain't secondary school as a maths teacher once told me, for gradebands 4 and below the curricular level is set beneath Primary 7 on purpose for the chavs.

And look, if these bitches have erased my record I'm under no threat; every one of my contacts have pledged to pay for the relevant Int 2 courses (Nat 5s as they are now) if this does happen so that Haselgrove can't get the tranny's revenge. I'll need about 6 of them (English, Maths, probably not Computing this time around I'll just go for Business or Admin, probably not Geography, I always wanted to do History instead but the teacher was like 'no' because of my autism despite Stevenson's pleas, Biology as my main science this time around which will be a cinch, haven't decided what my 6th will be yet), and I'll probably do better this time around. You're talking maybe £600 out-of-pocket and £1,200 from them.

I'm not letting you take the one thing I ever did semi-decently in away from me. Redoing secondary at 26 WILL PROVE I am indeed neurologically K-select and not ghetto-vermin with tricks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn't have been able to enter 4 HNC programmes only to drop out them without them. Back then it was 1 good Higher and several relevant good S-Grades; they've since bumped the requirements to 2 good Highers and about 5 relevant good S-Grades, probably because so many were wasting time there, taking the piss, and also to better interlink them to normal Universities which require 3 Highers at a minimum but prefer the 5.
Right, but is there any proof that I could see? Like how do I know you're not just making all that up?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Right, but is there any proof that I could see? Like how do I know you're not just making all that up?
The college have my SQA record. You'll know I'm not making it up when I demonstrate I have the ability to get all those again this year thanks to the help of Aspergian comrades' finances, and therefore, had the ability in the first place.

If it helps ease your suspicions, it's a bit of a con:
i. teaching to the test was endemic in Labour Britain
2. teaching to the BANDS and setting bands with individual grade-percentage required papers meant someone in the right class could get a 2 without effort, whilst someone who was relegated to a lower class only ends up getting a 5 despite their best efforts, although everyone sat the mid-tier paper:
how it worked when i went to school was sets had their individual paper, respectively Credit/top, General/mid, and Foundation/bottom; the percentage mark for each was 50% for the lower grade band (2, 4, and 6) and 70% for the upper one (1, 3 an 5 respectively) meaning it was all a massive con as the papers weren't contiguous in the first place and the curriculum was deliberately being tiered, sometimes not on ability: my Maths teacher moved someone down because he 'didn't like their class'
He knew I came from shit, but I dressed appropriately and acted decorally so he didn't mind me staying in his set.

So yes, perfectly conceivable for an idiot like me to get an upper-2 average; it doesn't mean the same as in England where the GCSE is one paper and bands A-G are indeed contiguous
 
You have a collective obsession with screaming. I want to talk to him. You're the ones projecting neurotypical chimp decorum onto superior Aspergian.

LATER THAT DAY



I can't believe 7 people were gullible enough to rate this as informant when I pressured her for an answer, whether in the affirmative or negative, for this very suspicion today.

Relentlessly shouting at her, she kept insisting she wasn't uncomfortable with it.
 
And look, if these bitches have erased my record I'm under no threat; every one of my contacts have pledged to pay for the relevant Int 2 courses (Nat 5s as they are now) if this does happen so that Haselgrove can't get the tranny's revenge. I'll need about 6 of them (English, Maths, probably not Computing this time around I'll just go for Business or Admin, probably not Geography, I always wanted to do History instead but the teacher was like 'no' because of my autism despite Stevenson's pleas, Biology as my main science this time around which will be a cinch, haven't decided what my 6th will be yet), and I'll probably do better this time around. You're talking maybe £600 out-of-pocket and £1,200 from them.

I'm not letting you take the one thing I ever did semi-decently in away from me. Redoing secondary at 26 WILL PROVE I am indeed neurologically K-select and not ghetto-vermin with tricks.

None of this matters because you're unable to function without the welfare state like a bloated bigoted leech.
 
The college have my SQA record. You'll know I'm not making it up when I demonstrate I have the ability to get all those again this year thanks to the help of Aspergian comrades' finances, and therefore, had the ability in the first place.

If it helps ease your suspicions, it's a bit of a con:
i. teaching to the test was endemic in Labour Britain
2. teaching to the BANDS and setting bands with individual grade-percentage required papers meant someone in the right class could get a 2 without effort, whilst someone who was relegated to a lower class only ends up getting a 5 despite their best efforts, although everyone sat the mid-tier paper:
how it worked when i went to school was sets had their individual paper, respectively Credit/top, General/mid, and Foundation/bottom; the percentage mark for each was 50% for the lower grade band (2, 4, and 6) and 70% for the upper one (1, 3 an 5 respectively) meaning it was all a massive con as the papers weren't contiguous in the first place and the curriculum was deliberately being tiered, sometimes not on ability: my Maths teacher moved someone down because he 'didn't like their class'
He knew I came from shit, but I dressed appropriately and acted decorally so he didn't mind me staying in his set.

So yes, perfectly conceivable for an idiot like me to get an upper-2 average; it doesn't mean the same as in England where the GCSE is one paper and bands A-G are indeed contiguous
As interesting as it is, I didn't really ask about how your education system works. I was asking if you could show me proof that you achieved what you say you achieved.
 
You're a fine one to talk.
No, really, there's a pretty continuous band of ability of autists in Scotland: you're either semi-intelligent like me and atiny hanful of others like Lagoona, or you're just a rock.

In America, there appears to be a lot more rocks (you, Coconut Gun), but a lot more geniuses as well (S-Chan) and more converge to an average (David, Walter, Negi; he's not that stupid, just naive).

Cuntster will just argue 'well there's more of them'; no, it's called selection effect, which apparently failed to weed you out from Kenya to Britain, bitch.
 
Read up the stress response. :)

When you're deliberately trying to invoke adrenal urges and paranoia, that's the inevitable result, i.e. it's not innate.

You could always learn self control.

As interesting as it is, I didn't really ask about how your education system works. I was asking if you could show me proof that you achieved what you say you achieved.

Answer the question, @Autphag.
 
As interesting as it is, I didn't really ask about how your education system works. I was asking if you could show me proof that you achieved what you say you achieved.
The college had that proof; they've proceeded to destroy it, and gave Kelly Anderson the connections to destroy these result-entries at the database level. I'm going down to ask Lennihan today as to why this has happened at a minimum seeing as he witnessed my record prior to its erasure. Also, to absolve myself of paedophile accusations, I'm getting him to independently investigate my computer even if it takes months of his spare time; I don't mind, I want off here anyway.
 
Back