- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Not sure if camel-toe or fupa-toe. Either way, please find some pants that fit. : (
She can't. They don't make any in Canada, remember? Duh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure if camel-toe or fupa-toe. Either way, please find some pants that fit. : (
You know, they aren't wrong that some people are just naturally heavier. My mom was in the military in her late twenties (this was almost 30 years ago) and she would often get sent to their extreme fat camp for being about 5-10 lbs over the weight they wanted her to be at. Looking at her, she was thinner and seemingly more fit than a lot of the other women lined up with her (she was a bombshell tbh). She was just naturally heavier, despite being in the best shape of her life and better shape than 90% of the population.
The problem is, they've taken this mindset to such extremes I can't even wrap my head around it. What IS the actual origin of this "I'm 400lbs and healthy!" nonsense. The FA movement didn't used to be like this. What quack posted a bogus study like the vaccine guy that got these people on this road? I really am curious where this actually originated. It kind of boggles my mind that it would evolve purely organically. Even the hardcore left ideologies originate from one source or another if you know the history.
There are quite a few watershed moments in the development of FA/HAES:
Late 60s/Early 70s: Feeder man starts National Association of Fat Admirers, then there is a more radical strain of fat activism growing off of that.
Mid 90s: Marilyn Wann publishes FATSO, and starts getting publicity for being an unrepentant whale.
00s: Linda Bacon starts HAES
10s: Rise of SJWism leads to spread of HAES/FA through Tumblr/Buzzfeed/Everday Feminism/Whitney Thore/Tess/Ragen etc.
If there is one particularly bad strain of research that has been adopted by HAES/FA it's probably the studies that say overweight BMI correlates with better outcomes than healthy weight but don't exclude smokers/terminally ill from the healthy weight population. They also love the studies that say the average woman is a size 16, 18, etc, that interpret data via the mean (so the very large people on the far end shift the mean to be greater than the median).
At 8:30 she says skinny jeans with tight ankles create a "fat bubble".
How can an ankle be fat enough to do that
I mean I've seen evidence and I know how super obesity happens but HOW CAN AN ANKLE BE FAT ENOUGH TO DO THAT
It's more like I know logically these things exist but I can't wrap the emotional side of my brain around it. Like seeing a number with twenty zeroes.You've never heard of "cankles"?
Looks pretty smashable to meIIRC, didn't the "What's Your Excuse" woman end up gaining a bunch of weight? (The first one, that is)
These people are the reason Obamacare failed.
And airplane seats, movie theaters, escalators, most residential and commercial doorways, bathroom stalls, medical scanning equipment designed for human beings....These women are not fat; they are just too wide for your narrow minds.