🐱 Stanford University course to study ‘abolishing whiteness’

CatParty
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/35419/


Stanford University is slated to offer a class this fall called “White Identity Politics,” during which students will “survey the field of whiteness studies” and discuss the “possibilities of … abolishing whiteness,” according to the course description.

Citing pundits who say “the 2016 Presidential election marks the rise of white identity politics in the United States,” the upper-level anthropology seminar will draw “from the field of whiteness studies and from contemporary writings that push whiteness studies in new directions.”

Questions to be posed throughout the semester include: “Does white identity politics exist?” and “How is a concept like white identity to be understood in relation to white nationalism, white supremacy, white privilege, and whiteness?”

“Students will consider the perils and possibilities of different political practices,” according to the course description, “including abolishing whiteness or coming to terms with white identity.”

The course will be taught by instructor John Patrick Moran. Reached by e-mail, Moran declined to comment, instead directing The College Fix to Stanford communication’s office.

Ernest Miranda, a spokesman for Stanford, told The Fix via e-mail that “‘abolishing whiteness’ is a concept put forward in the 1990s by a number of white historians. Their belief was that if other white people would, like them, stop identifying politically as white, it would help end inequalities.”

Miranda added that “abolishing whiteness” is “among the past and current concepts that will be considered” in the “White Identity Politics” course. The Fix requested a copy of the syllabus, but Miranda declined, saying “we do not share our course materials.”

Reached by e-mail, Stanford Professor Tomás Jiménez, who told The Fix that he sponsored a student-led class at Stanford on whiteness last semester, said via e-mail that whiteness is “the set of behaviors and outlooks associated with the racial category, white.”

“Just about any social category and subcategory has a ‘…ness’ to it. So, liberals and conservatives; men and women; Wisconsinites and New Yorkers are all social categories, and adding ‘ness’ to any of them is shorthand for the behaviors and outlooks associated with that category,” said Jiménez, an associate professor of sociology and comparative studies in race and ethnicity.
 
So, basically, 10 years of telling white shitlords to check their white privilege, and consider their whitey mc white whiteness, that was so white it was literally invisible and in a bag of some kind, that was probably white, and did we mention you're white? Because you're white? Actually backfired. Because being told over and over that you were white, extreme White 2000, and agreeing that you are, indeed... white, and considering one's whiteness AT LENGTH, as instructed, does not actually result in not thinking of themselves as actually white.

Shocking.

Excuse me while I go eyeroll to death.
 
More like John Patrick Moron.
morans.jpg
 
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/35419/


Stanford University is slated to offer a class this fall called “White Identity Politics,” during which students will “survey the field of whiteness studies” and discuss the “possibilities of … abolishing whiteness,” according to the course description.

Citing pundits who say “the 2016 Presidential election marks the rise of white identity politics in the United States,” the upper-level anthropology seminar will draw “from the field of whiteness studies and from contemporary writings that push whiteness studies in new directions.”

Questions to be posed throughout the semester include: “Does white identity politics exist?” and “How is a concept like white identity to be understood in relation to white nationalism, white supremacy, white privilege, and whiteness?”

“Students will consider the perils and possibilities of different political practices,” according to the course description, “including abolishing whiteness or coming to terms with white identity.”

The course will be taught by instructor John Patrick Moran. Reached by e-mail, Moran declined to comment, instead directing The College Fix to Stanford communication’s office.

Ernest Miranda, a spokesman for Stanford, told The Fix via e-mail that “‘abolishing whiteness’ is a concept put forward in the 1990s by a number of white historians. Their belief was that if other white people would, like them, stop identifying politically as white, it would help end inequalities.”

Miranda added that “abolishing whiteness” is “among the past and current concepts that will be considered” in the “White Identity Politics” course. The Fix requested a copy of the syllabus, but Miranda declined, saying “we do not share our course materials.”

Reached by e-mail, Stanford Professor Tomás Jiménez, who told The Fix that he sponsored a student-led class at Stanford on whiteness last semester, said via e-mail that whiteness is “the set of behaviors and outlooks associated with the racial category, white.”

“Just about any social category and subcategory has a ‘…ness’ to it. So, liberals and conservatives; men and women; Wisconsinites and New Yorkers are all social categories, and adding ‘ness’ to any of them is shorthand for the behaviors and outlooks associated with that category,” said Jiménez, an associate professor of sociology and comparative studies in race and ethnicity.
As this forum's resident redneck ambassador, let me tell you they're about *this close* to seriously pissing us off. I have so many acquaintances that are just itching to fight back.
 
I got curious.


Mr. Moran.
http://twitter.com/johnp_moran?lang=en
http://anthropology.stanford.edu/people/john-moran
http://www.johnmoranwriter.com/

http://www.politico.com/states/flor...mid-protests-and-democratic-opposition-104254

John Moran, identified on the Stanford University web site as a graduate student in anthropology, was led away by law enforcement officers as he took the dais just prior to the vote.

"The environmental community hasn't been given a vote," Moran said to a smattering of applause. "The governor spat on our democratic process by keeping those seats vacant for over a year."

https://stanfordfas.wordpress.com/
John Moran (Stanford University, Anthropology): “’They Come Here to Support Botswana Somehow’: (De)Theorizing Chinese-Batswana Interactions in Gaborone” <----what does this even meeeean?


http://www.southerncultures.org/article/queer-rednecks-padgett-powells-manly-south/
 
Last edited:
Winner, winner, chicken dinner. He's also apparently a white dude organizer for the Stanford Forum for African Studies.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DeadwastePrime
You wanna piss off rednecks? Mention to them that their culture is the same thing as "city culture"

Bonus points if you base said assumption on skin color
 
After 6 straight years of losing the House, the Senate, 75% of all Governorships and ultimately the White House liberals still don't understand that identity politics isn't a winning platform?

The fundamental problem is that identity politics is about trying to pigeon hole yourself into the smallest possible group then REEEEEEEEE at anyone who doesn't perfectly align with your world view.

The Republican Party is the total opposite. Oh you're a black dude that doesn't like Fords being built in Mexico and you want to shoot people who break into your house? Welcome to the party.
 
Last edited:
They're only studying it to showcase to rub it in to snowflakes that it's literally impossible to do so, and any attempt to replace 'whiteness' with any other 'ness' will inevitably result in the collapse of civilization.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: escapegoat
I promise to continue being white for the rest of my life.

So they can just give up on that concept.
I was just your average black kid before discovering shitposting. Now all my melanin has left me and I desire an education and a healthy family life. Praise Jesus for this transformative experience and all the white women.

After 6 straight years of losing the House, the Senate, 75% of all Governorships and ultimately the White House liberals still don't understand that identity politics isn't a winning platform?

The fundamental problem is that identify politics is about trying to pigeon hole yourself into the smallest possible group then REEEEEEEEE at anyone who doesn't perfectly align with your world view.

The Republican Party is the total opposite. Oh you're a black dude that doesn't like Fords being built in Mexico and you want to shoot people who break into your house? Welcome to the party.
That and it requires a really black/white (heh) view of the world where you view racial/ethnic/sexual demographics as hiveminds. There's nothing hardcoded into gays, women, minorities, etc. to make them accept this crap.

They wouldn't see it as pigeonholing themselves as they believe they stand for everyone who doesn't fit the label of "straight white cis male".
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Male Idiot
Back