🐱 Stanford University course to study ‘abolishing whiteness’

CatParty
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/35419/


Stanford University is slated to offer a class this fall called “White Identity Politics,” during which students will “survey the field of whiteness studies” and discuss the “possibilities of … abolishing whiteness,” according to the course description.

Citing pundits who say “the 2016 Presidential election marks the rise of white identity politics in the United States,” the upper-level anthropology seminar will draw “from the field of whiteness studies and from contemporary writings that push whiteness studies in new directions.”

Questions to be posed throughout the semester include: “Does white identity politics exist?” and “How is a concept like white identity to be understood in relation to white nationalism, white supremacy, white privilege, and whiteness?”

“Students will consider the perils and possibilities of different political practices,” according to the course description, “including abolishing whiteness or coming to terms with white identity.”

The course will be taught by instructor John Patrick Moran. Reached by e-mail, Moran declined to comment, instead directing The College Fix to Stanford communication’s office.

Ernest Miranda, a spokesman for Stanford, told The Fix via e-mail that “‘abolishing whiteness’ is a concept put forward in the 1990s by a number of white historians. Their belief was that if other white people would, like them, stop identifying politically as white, it would help end inequalities.”

Miranda added that “abolishing whiteness” is “among the past and current concepts that will be considered” in the “White Identity Politics” course. The Fix requested a copy of the syllabus, but Miranda declined, saying “we do not share our course materials.”

Reached by e-mail, Stanford Professor Tomás Jiménez, who told The Fix that he sponsored a student-led class at Stanford on whiteness last semester, said via e-mail that whiteness is “the set of behaviors and outlooks associated with the racial category, white.”

“Just about any social category and subcategory has a ‘…ness’ to it. So, liberals and conservatives; men and women; Wisconsinites and New Yorkers are all social categories, and adding ‘ness’ to any of them is shorthand for the behaviors and outlooks associated with that category,” said Jiménez, an associate professor of sociology and comparative studies in race and ethnicity.
 
I got curious.


Mr. Moran.
http://twitter.com/johnp_moran?lang=en
http://anthropology.stanford.edu/people/john-moran
http://www.johnmoranwriter.com/

http://www.politico.com/states/flor...mid-protests-and-democratic-opposition-104254



https://stanfordfas.wordpress.com/
John Moran (Stanford University, Anthropology): “’They Come Here to Support Botswana Somehow’: (De)Theorizing Chinese-Batswana Interactions in Gaborone” <----what does this even meeeean?


http://www.southerncultures.org/article/queer-rednecks-padgett-powells-manly-south/

Something about Chinese immigrant workers in Africa. Batswana are what people in Botswana call themselves collectively. There are several thousand Chinese in Botswana. I think there was a documentary on it recently. That might be related to whatever anthropological nonsense Johnny boy is spewing there.

It's always an educated white person who starts this sort of trouble on an academic level. These courses are useless for the work force. The kinds of students who take these courses are probably all majoring in women's studies or some other "go straight to McDonald's after graduation" major. I'd love to just peak in on the classroom and see just how tumblr it is. I'm sure it's very varied in hair color and exceeds airplane weight capacity.
 
Something about Chinese immigrant workers in Africa. Batswana are what people in Botswana call themselves collectively. There are several thousand Chinese in Botswana. I think there was a documentary on it recently. That might be related to whatever anthropological nonsense Johnny boy is spewing there.

It's always an educated white person who starts this sort of trouble on an academic level. These courses are useless for the work force. The kinds of students who take these courses are probably all majoring in women's studies or some other "go straight to McDonald's after graduation" major. I'd love to just peak in on the classroom and see just how tumblr it is. I'm sure it's very varied in hair color and exceeds airplane weight capacity.

I 100% guarantee the paper is just a social justice diatribe about the Chinese colonizing the more stable parts of Africa (like Botswana) via infrastructure improvements. This is somehow the fault of white people and will continue to keep the noble African natives down and unable to fully civilize and realize their true potential.

They may not use those exact words, but it's the same underlying philosophy as the Social Darwinists in the 19th century. Condescending racism never went out of style, the reason why whites were different and we had to give more to nonwhites just changed.
 
I have to assume all this "end whiteness" stuff comes as a reaction to the fact that America/Europe are declining in power and importance while China ramps up. A lot of people want to cling to the idea that racial superiority ideologies and cruelty to other races is a solely Euro thing, because it enshrines white people as being so much better at colonization that no one else can possibly compete or even be considered in the same category. By saying whiteness is the problem, they can stick their fingers in their ears for a while longer and can pretend whitey's still on top and always will be unless white people voluntarily give it up.
 
I was just your average black kid before discovering shitposting. Now all my melanin has left me and I desire an education and a healthy family life. Praise Jesus for this transformative experience and all the white women.


That and it requires a really black/white (heh) view of the world where you view racial/ethnic/sexual demographics as hiveminds. There's nothing hardcoded into gays, women, minorities, etc. to make them accept this crap.

They wouldn't see it as pigeonholing themselves as they believe they stand for everyone who doesn't fit the label of "straight white cis male".
But those straight white people still make up most of the country, and tend to not like it when you call them scum.
 
The kinds of students who take these courses are probably all majoring in women's studies or some other "go straight to McDonald's after graduation" major.

The funniest part of the is once they're stuck being dirt poor because of their own choices, they always double down and insist that the system isn't working right and needs to be replaced. How can such a smart insightful person be stuck flipping burgers in a system that works right, after all.
 
Back