Orbiter DarkSydePhil A-Logs General - Infighting and Cringe Galore (Sons of Kojima, et al)

Will suprczy actually file a lolsuit against Philip Paul Burnell?

  • Yes

    Votes: 34 18.2%
  • No

    Votes: 164 87.7%

  • Total voters
    187
Who is that person with the hilariously childish avatar acting like a badass?
Call their bluff. Say whatever you want as rational and justifiable criticism, whenever you want to express it. Don't let anybody hold anything over on you.
Anime is not childish ok it's for mature people.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Um Oh Ah Yeah
2 channels that stretch Phil topics for hours and hours no matter how stale it gets.

Almighty Tevin
1.PNG
2.PNG

Sons of Kojima
3.PNG
4.PNG
5.PNG
 
Yep. Definitely the one video that got the longest duration so far would be 7 hours. Problem is what can the 7 hours can be put to good use for.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Stay safe
They found the encyclopedia dramatica page "Very funny." Yeah and not being a weeb, and have persona 4 as your favorite game...
Well who am i kidding, they recently got a power TV "executive" named Nicole on and praised her. Because she talked about how fraudulent DSP is. And me for that matter for saying they defame phil.
If you do a tiny amount of research in to Power Tv. You will find some people running a MCN with Really shady business practices. Here is some information about them.
They are just straight up fraud. Some of what these people have done have been illegal.
And if brought to a court, they would face some real criminal charges.
It's not like DSP, or SOK who is about bullshit, and who has the biggest e-penis. And broken patron goals.
No people have been in a real financial quagmire, and been subjected to mafia like situations because of these people.

You do not use a serial rapist and murderer, to discredit someone for sexual harassment.
Just like you don't use people that defraud youtube content creators, to discredit someone asking for donations on twitch.
People are allowed to criticize who they want. And Them being really bad scam artists, does not excuse other types of behavior.
But reading to this thread, I really think that the SOK really should be named the Sons of Hypocrisy. Or maybe even Sons of Phil as someone suggested. If they did, I would support them.

Yeah and please, judge this on the merits of what I am writing, not who I am. Or my own actions. Unless directly related to this. I have no interest in fighting any of you, I just wanted to add my two cents about something i found rather interesting with this SOK situation.
 
Hey @BSV if you get threadbanned from this thread as well, are you gonna go on another blocking spree in Phil's chat? Because I might actually watch one of his livestreams in that case!
 
They found the encyclopedia dramatica page "Very funny." Yeah and not being a weeb, and have persona 4 as your favorite game...
Well who am i kidding, they recently got a power TV "executive" named Nicole on and praised her. Because she talked about how fraudulent DSP is. And me for that matter for saying they defame phil.
If you do a tiny amount of research in to Power Tv. You will find some people running a MCN with Really shady business practices. Here is some information about them.
They are just straight up fraud. Some of what these people have done have been illegal.
And if brought to a court, they would face some real criminal charges.
It's not like DSP, or SOK who is about bullshit, and who has the biggest e-penis. And broken patron goals.
No people have been in a real financial quagmire, and been subjected to mafia like situations because of these people.

You do not use a serial rapist and murderer, to discredit someone for sexual harassment.
Just like you don't use people that defraud youtube content creators, to discredit someone asking for donations on twitch.
People are allowed to criticize who they want. And Them being really bad scam artists, does not excuse other types of behavior.
But reading to this thread, I really think that the SOK really should be named the Sons of Hypocrisy. Or maybe even Sons of Phil as someone suggested. If they did, I would support them.

Yeah and please, judge this on the merits of what I am writing, not who I am. Or my own actions. Unless directly related to this. I have no interest in fighting any of you, I just wanted to add my two cents about something i found rather interesting with this SOK situation.
No one cares about your hateboner for Nicole. She's not an SoK member and doesn't care that much about Phil so she's got nothing to do with this thread.

Also, if your report wasn't fraudulent then why did Twitch restore the SoK's channel?
 
Also, if your report wasn't fraudulent then why did Twitch restore the SoK's channel?
Because it was fraudulent. 100% undeniably fraudulent despite what BSV may think. I watched that SoK sitdown with BSV. BSV, you made it blatantly obvious your reasons for reporting the channel were fraudulent. You had no proof of anything whatsoever and were simply going off of your preconceived notions of who the SoK are, and a bunch of bullshit said to you by someone else.

When are you going to wake up and realize who you're giving money to? You're giving money to a greedy cockroach who refuses to get an actual job like a normal decent human being, and instead chooses to sponge off of little kids who steal their parent's credit cards to give the pigroach money. He put himself into the financial situation he's in and expects others to bail him out. That's not how life works.
 
Last edited:
Autistic ramblings that have already gotten BSV banned from multiple threads
Thanks for summarizing this thread I guess. One of the last things you said in the KOP thread was you did not like people calling out your double standards, but outside of the b.s criminal charges everything said about SoK can be said about Dsp. I get it, because Dsp forces out a thank you after you give him hundreds of dollars you think he is nice to you so you ignore his faults while you see them in everyone else. Much like how SoK and their viewers may ignore when things they do come close/match things they call Phil out for. Nobody here needs to be convinced SoK have their autistic moments, after all this thread exists. This is not the SoK fan club thread. I guess I do not understand what you are trying to accomplish here.
 
I knew that this would happen. That is why I wrote the last paragraph. I literary don't care about Nicole. But she was a guest on their podcast.
But hey, it's wrong because I say it. This is literary one of the biggest scandals of the SOK
Some of you guys seem more interested in me then the actual thread.
It goes so far as to fucking whiteknight for the group to get me, with something that is totally wrong to I might add.
like I think this is hysterically funny. It's like I am unintentionally trolling some of the guys that just suddenly show up. Stay safe guys. :)
 
I knew that this would happen. That is why I wrote the last paragraph. I literary don't care about Nicole. But she was a guest on their podcast.
But hey, it's wrong because I say it. This is literary one of the biggest scandals of the SOK
Some of you guys seem more interested in me then the actual thread.
It goes so far as to fucking whiteknight for the group to get me, with something that is totally wrong to I might add.
like I think this is hysterically funny. It's like I am unintentionally trolling some of the guys that just suddenly show up. Stay safe guys. :)
I just want to point out that BSV thinks literally is spelt as literary.
 
What say you about my prior post, @BSV? But let me make one thing abundantly clear first: I'm not trying to be a jerk to you or anything. I'm literally (that's the word you were looking for) trying to get you to open your eyes and wake up to the reality of who you're giving your money away to. If you're wealthy and can throw your cash around, then so be it. I think you could invest your money a bit more wisely as opposed to giving it to a giant leech, but that's just my opinion. And yeah, I get the whole "supporting content creators" thing, but here's the problem with that; Phil isn't exactly a content creator per se. The extent of his content creation is "click record, do a bunch of stuff, click stop, upload video, "babysit the upload" (which isn't even necessary), repeat".

And as for your belief that your reporting of the SoK Twitch channel was not fraudulent, allow me to propose a hypothetical situation to you. Let's say someone came to me on Twitch (if I had a Twitch channel) and said "hey, this BSV guy called you a faggot". And let's say I had no actual proof of anything like that being said, and was simply going off of what was told to me, and I went and reported your Twitch channel and it got shut down. Would you say my reporting of your channel was fraudulent?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Stay safe
I would love to have this debate with you. And address your points. But it's a total derailment. It's not even a point I made. And It's already my fault this is being derailed. Just because I am who I am.
Yeah, nice excuse. Almost on the same level as one of Phil's excuses. My question about the twitch reporting isn't derailment given the topic is the SoK and you. That you couldn't even answer that doesn't surprise me, given how far up your own arse your head is when it comes to Phil and logical thinking.

"Oh god no, I can't respond to your points, that would entail me admitting I was wrong!", is basically what you're saying to me.
 
Yeah, nice excuse. Almost on the same level as one of Phil's excuses. My question about the twitch reporting isn't derailment given the topic is the SoK and you. That you couldn't even answer that doesn't surprise me, given how up-your-own-arse your head is when it comes to Phil and logical thinking.

OK as you wish. They got taken down, on the count of many reports, I wasn't the only one. and that they had people in our chat constantly shilling the podcast. It was not a fraudulent report.
It got taken down and it was a good reason for it.
The reason so many people flagged it was that they where using stuff phil had just streamed. They can not do that.
 
OK as you wish. They got taken down, on the count of many reports, I wasn't the only one. and that they had people in our chat constantly shilling the podcast. It was not a fraudulent report.
It got taken down and it was a good reason for it.
The reason so many people flagged it was that they where using stuff phil had just streamed. They can not do that.
If it wasn't fraudulent then why was the channel restored?
 
Back