Wizchan / Assigned Male Accidental Merger

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Move to Lolcow Subforum?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Depiction of Wizard home life.
PRcOcE9.gif

That ain't a real wizard. His staff is way too big, obviously a normalfag. Plus did you expect anyone to miss the fact that he literally killed a pussy in that gif? :roll: Nice try, Chad.
 
I was debating for a while on bumping this thread, mostly because I haven't been online in months. But there was a thread on Wizardchan I thought worthy of sharing.
~~~

Wizards and Jealousy
http://wizardchan.org/v9k/res/108257.html
Does anyone else just absolutely DESPISE all things to do with female promiscuity?

By promiscuity I mean ever doing anything sexual outside of a committed monogamous relationship, but it also applies to them doing things /pol/ would consider degenerate like wearing yoga pants or talking about masturbating or similar things.

I have felt like this for as long as I can remember. I know the normies are going to be coming in this thread shouting about "LEL SOUR GRAPES LE MAD HE CAN'T GET PUSSY TOPKEK TOPLELE JUS B URSEL BRAH :)" but that's not even the case - I'm sure I'd feel the same way even if I was a chad.

I can't explain where this hatred comes from, and it's strange because I was raised by very liberal parents, was always taught that sex isn't shameful, and as most kids in the western world are I was basically told to give women a pussy pass and view them as angels who can do no wrong, so surely it shouldn't bother me as much as it would bother a very conservative traditional christian or a muslim preacher or something.. but it does.

It's so strong too. Whenever I hear a woman say something like "oh yah this guy that i'm seeing" or just reading posts on the internet where a woman talks about having casual sex or her "friend with benefits" or something similar I just seethe with rage. I just feel as if it's completely unnatural for them to be like this, like it's an instinct that this is truly wrong. Another thing that makes me feel this way is when women claim to be "bisexual". Okay maybe some legitimately are but I bet 99% of the time it's solely done for attention, To women, having an alternate sexual orientation is just a new fashion accessory.

It's actually gotten to the point where I can't even browse certain websites because of how much anger I feel. I don't go on 4chan anymore with the exception of some boards where this shit isn't spoken about, I never read the comments on youtube, and I have stopped browsing most of the old forums I used to, just because of how much white knighting and pro-women shit I see.

Oh and don't even get me fucking started on shit like tinder. Any woman found with Tinder on her phone should be fucking shot in the back of the head and dumped in a mass grave, seriously. Tinder and similar phenomena is going to create millions more wizards, because think about it:
>A woman wants sex with the most attractive man
>She does not want to settle
>Tinder allows her to literally SWIPE to determine if a man's worthy or not. No getting to know him, no going on a date, no nothing, she just looks at a picture of him and decides whether to give him her body.
>She becomes extremely selective, and as a result even 8/10 guys can't get laid when chad's available

Don't get me wrong. I'm not mad because I will never have sex, I'm not mad because nobody wants to date me, I'm mad because all women benefit and 95% of men lose with the promotion of casual sex.
It just makes me fucking sick. I HOPE Islam will take over.

Please, please tell me someone here agrees with my views.
I have to give credit to Wizardchan though, someone posted a reply to this post that encapsulates much of my rebuttal.

>Wahhhh sex is bad

You masturbate 5 times a day to little cartoon girls and you're gonna blame women for having fun with their sexuality?

Being a prude is retarded

I think much of this line of thought stems entirely from jealousy and a lack of contact with women. Along with a guilt of his own sexual desires and hatred toward women for flaunting their own.

Unfortunately the OP (or someone who agrees with the OP) posted a response

>Being a prude is retarded

Kindly get the fuck out and continue fucking your used up cum dripping STD-ridden whorebags you retarded normalfag.

You're a FOOL to think that man should be fine with a slut. Listen, most men are alright with a woman being at least with 2-5 men. A dozen men alone is pushing it. A promiscuous woman is not a good thing to men. Men don't like it, because they're not ensured on whether or not the child they have with the woman will even be theirs.

Dumbass, why the fuck do you think the alphas merely pump and dump the whores? Do you fucking see any alphas marrying some random good looking whore? No! They wanna marry the best of the best. The ones that haven't been used up yet. There's a reason why the alphas seek single young and barely legal women. They're the ones that possibly haven't been used up yet. The betas marry the old ones that aren't prudes and fuck up their own lives because they believe settling down with an old used up whore that can't get anymore alpha cock is good enough.

And while sex is not evil, having a lot of it can lead to gaining STDs. And by the way you're speaking, you make it seem like having unlimited amounts of sex is bad. Well, the more you have sex, the more likely it is that you will gain STDs. For goodness sakes, I even knew a small group of people at my school who fucked around with each other and STILL caught some form of STDs. Promiscuity can be literally bad for one's health unless you wanna act like STDs don't exist.

Female promiscuity is indeed just all around bad. And the fact that society promotes it only makes things so much worse. Encouraging the promiscuity of females has now almost completely destroyed the family unit, and monogamous relationships and marriage are now also a joke. Really, Just get the fuck out of here. You're a part of the problem and you clearly don't fit in here. A true apprentice/wizard despises everything about this problem. You're just a normalfag trying to spread your bullshit. Well let me just tell you that we will NEVER take in your bullshit. We see it for what it is. It is like a cancer, spreading and slowly destroying everything from within.

I can only hope that in your last moments of your life, you will look upon the wretched result of your vile ideals and see the wicked society you have wrought upon us. You and your lot are the ruinators of societies. Pic fuckin' related. You have ALWAYS existed, since the time of the ancient romans and even the fucking babylonian civilization. You're both a result and a causation. You're a result of this hyperfeminized society that has brought a generation of people that has let the ways of the blue pill damage and limit their thinking by thinking that their bullshit is "progressive". It was never progressive. This has happened before, and so has the fall with it, each and every single time. Your causes will result in the collapse of western society in some way. This is now inevitable, especially considering the rise of developing countries which will probably take our place.
and of course, yet another reply from someone who outlines his new age religion's stance on women.

>Please, please tell me someone here agrees with my views.

I agree absolutely but I don't want Islam to take over. I have instead joined a New Age religion that has basically all the same views on women.

e.g.

If a woman is raped, the rapist and the raped should either marry each other, or both are put to death.

A woman's primary role is as a mother to raise and teach offspring, women who sacrifice motherhood for careers are degenerate trash.

Women are to obey their husbands and the man is to assume the dominant role in the relationship (the man must not be degenerate himself though and must be a proper man).

If one has sex, they are married.

Divorce is not acceptable, if the marriage fails, they are to commit suicide. If they don't want to die, then they should fix the relationship.
I think most of this fascist shit speaks for itself
 
Last edited:
What's funny is I remember reading somewhere that scientists believe when we were all bumbling cavemen that women would have sex with multiple men to cut down on the risk of any of them killing the children out of jealousy, since they'd fear killing their own, and then there would be more of them willing to protect the children. I'm not sure where the theory comes from, but it's funny he thinks it's an "unnatural instinct" for women to desire casual partnership, especially considering the evolutionary incentive to find the best mate, you're obviously not going to get it right the first go-round.

Idk wizards act like they're really smart but I feel like they don't actually think things through.
 
What's funny is I remember reading somewhere that scientists believe when we were all bumbling cavemen that women would have sex with multiple men to cut down on the risk of any of them killing the children out of jealousy, since they'd fear killing their own, and then there would be more of them willing to protect the children. I'm not sure where the theory comes from, but it's funny he thinks it's an "unnatural instinct" for women to desire casual partnership, especially considering the evolutionary incentive to find the best mate, you're obviously not going to get it right the first go-round.

Idk wizards act like they're really smart but I feel like they don't actually think things through.
In most other animals like cats, females are promiscuous and have to mate with multiple males due to their 'heat' season only lasting two weeks, and there's no guarantee of insemination.

Monogamy is practiced entirely by humans. I'm not saying it's a bad thing but I don't feel it should be forced on anyone. Especially considering just how horribly women are treated in Islam related countries.

Thankfully all this shit is pretty crazy in Western society. And from our perspective it just comes off like "If I can't get laid by choice, I'll force women to have sex with me."
 
  • Like
Reactions: cluelessly
Well, social monogamy is practiced by a few other species like prairie voles. Just had to point that out.
There is a case to be made for monogamy being a social construct and not a sexual one. Prairie Voles as well as certain species of birds do exhibit traits befitting monogamous relationships. Though usually in those species individuals do cheat on their mates.

Likewise this also gets into a bit of a genetic argument.
Psychology Today said:
In 2008, Swedish researcher Hasse Walum and others (4) reported that variation in a gene known as RS3 affected men's capacity to form an emotional bond with a woman. Men with a double dose of the gene were twice as likely to have troubled marriages. This gene affects the angiotensin receptor system that plays a critical role in social monogamy for male prairie voles.

Source: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201007/monogamy-is-social-not-sexual

Regardless of the origins of monogamy I would still argue forcing it on an individual against their will is a more human, and in this case Wizard invention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Venusaur
Sometimes I hear the things wizards say and it pisses me off. Then I remember that they'll never get to breed and will most likely die alone on a jizz covered bed in their moms house surrounded by anime figurines, and suddenly I stop just stop caring. Weird, huh?
 
I think most of this fascist shit speaks for itself

Also, the racism and bigotry is kind of funny.

"alphas"

:story:

Like we're all a bunch of dogs or something.

Well, from a purely biological perspective, yeah, we are. We're born, we live, we fuck, we eat, we die. Everything is just kind of incidental to that.

In most other animals like cats, females are promiscuous and have to mate with multiple males due to their 'heat' season only lasting two weeks, and there's no guarantee of insemination.

That's not true at all. Some animals, yes, but not all. And that's before we get into whether an animal is r-selective or K-selective.

Monogamy is practiced entirely by humans.

Again, not true at all. Aside from the fact that there are other animal species that are mostly or entirely monogamous (especially when you talk about birds) humans are fairly polyamorous. Most primates are, in fact. Gorillas form harems, male orangutans will mate with any females in or bordering their territory, and bonobos are famous for using sex as part of their social hierarchy. Humans do it too.

Especially considering just how horribly women are treated in Islam related countries.

Yes, there are some social problems in some Muslim majority countries, but its hardly the default, nor is it confined to Islam. Hell, many Muslim countries don't legally allow polygamy, and even in ones that do it can be uncommon and hard to do. Not to mention that other religions allow polygamy too. Its fairly widespread in Africa, even if its not legal in some African countries.

And of course, polygamy is not the only form of polyamory. There are plenty of men who go out and cheat on their wives or girlfriends (and plenty of women who cheat on their husbands). Its really not that different. Remember, marriage is a manmade institution, not something that's instinctive. I suspect if Greco-Roman cultural mores weren't so prevalent Europe and America, you'd still see polygamy practiced there. Hell, its even mentioned in the Torah.

Thankfully all this shit is pretty crazy in Western society. And from our perspective it just comes off like "If I can't get laid by choice, I'll force women to have sex with me."[/QUOTE]
 
  • Like
Reactions: DoctorLasagna
There is a case to be made for monogamy being a social construct and not a sexual one. Prairie Voles as well as certain species of birds do exhibit traits befitting monogamous relationships. Though usually in those species individuals do cheat on their mates.

Likewise this also gets into a bit of a genetic argument.

Regardless of the origins of monogamy I would still argue forcing it on an individual against their will is a more human, and in this case Wizard invention.

Yeah, social and sexual monogamy are separate things. The former is uncommon and the latter is ridiculously rare. Humans have polygamous tendencies despite the popularity of social monogamy. Just another thing for the paragons of insecurity to get riled about.
 
Yes, there are some social problems in some Muslim majority countries, but its hardly the default, nor is it confined to Islam. Hell, many Muslim countries don't legally allow polygamy, and even in ones that do it can be uncommon and hard to do. Not to mention that other religions allow polygamy too. Its fairly widespread in Africa, even if its not legal in some African countries.

I don't think Cuddlebug was confining criticism of how Muslims treat women to the practice of polygamy.
 
From a purely biological standpoint then yes Alpha Males do exist. So do Beta Males who are somehow both the females preferred mate and somehow also a weak individual despite what being a desirable mate means...

How many Wizards actually know what the fuck they're talking about? Because it seems like they got their biology lessons from Pok'emon.

"BAWWWW da football player gets da pretty girls with his muscles" is semi reasonable when you're a High School Sophomore, but once you turn 30...

Maybe these faggots need to hit the gym, or just admit that they like dick.
 
Last edited:
Did it ever occur to them that women have as many varied tastes in men as men have varied tastes in women?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back