🐱 Gamers will always make something up to get mad about

CatParty
Status
Not open for further replies.
https://theoutline.com/post/2218/gamergate-will-never-die-alt-right-trump


A coalition of people who play video games and also like to yell online is up in arms this week over a 26-minute video of VentureBeat gaming writer Dean Takahashi playing Cuphead, a soon to be released game for Xbox and PC.

The video, which has been viewed more than half a million times since it was uploaded on August 24, has been called “grossly negligent” and “pathetic.” YouTube commenters suggested it would be appropriate for Takahashi to kill himself and wondered if he was “retarded.” It triggered multiple Reddit threads and a slew of YouTube reaction videos including “Venturebeat Can't Cuphead - Games Journalism Fail” and “Dean's Shameful Cuphead Demo Vs Pigeon Intelligence Test.” Gamergater supporter Ian Miles Cheong, formerly a writer for the now defunct Heat Street and now at Tucker Carlson’s Daily Caller, has been tweeting incessantly about the video for five days, most recently after he recruited a 4-year-old to provide commentaryon the video.


“So, there's a lot of people saying I'm not qualified to do my job, and then it escalates to ‘I should go fuck myself,’ ‘you're shit,’ ‘how can you be paid to play games,’ and ‘you should go kill yourself,’” Takahasi told The Outline.“Fortunately, it's never gotten worse than that.”

Takahashi, the lead writer for VentureBeat’s vertical GamesBeat, has worked as a journalist for 25 years. His previous gigs include The Wall Street Journal, where he coveredchip manufacturers like Intel in the 90s, and before that, The Los Angeles Times. He recorded the video that would make make thousands of people mad online at Gamescom, the gaming trade show in Germany. His crime? He played the game poorly, struggling to complete the tutorial and then dying repeatedly once he got into the actual game. VentureBeat titled the video, “Cuphead gameplay: Dean embarrasses himself for 26 minutes.” Takahashi wrote, “I suck at Cuphead. Let’s get this out of the way,” and pokes fun at himself during his short review.

The disclaimer didn’t save him.

Cheong’s initial tweet about the video has 12,000 retweets. “Game journalists are incredibly bad at video games,” Cheong seethed. “How do they think they're qualified to write about games?”

Takahashi said after that tweet blew up, “the anger really just sort of grew from that.”

Maybe it’s the ascendency of the alt-right, which has its roots in the Gamergate movement in terms of ideology and online mob mentality. Maybe it’s the fact that Zoe Quinn, Gamergate patient zero, is doing a book tour, prompting the people who harassed her mercilessly throughout 2014 to return in order to trash her Amazon reviews. Whatever the reason, it suddenly feels as if Gamergate never ended. The suspicion of the press is back, the menacing tweets are back; the sanctimonious rhetoric — “it’s about ethics in games journalism!” — used to justify what is essentially cyberbullying is back. Takahashi’s inability to play Cuphead shows that the emperor (games journalists) have no clothes (the ability to play games), which is an indictment of the empire (games journalism and also the mainstream media as a whole). John Bain, also known as Total Biscuit, a guy who makes content about video games on the internet, said the video shows a “harmful level of incompetence.”


Regardless of whether Takahashi is good at video games or good at journalism, it’s rich to suggest that his botched gameplay is harmful. This reflects the delusions of grandeur critical to the Gamergate mindset, where minor and imaginary offenses justify sustained harassment. Despite being the victim of an unhinged mob of ideologues, Takahashi is contrite; he has been patient and conciliatory with his critics. During a podcast in which his VentureBeat colleagues pointed out that his Cuphead demo happened in the middle of a long day, that the bulk of his job is not playing games like this, and that he was doing an interview at the same time, Takahashi said, “Those are excuses for bad game play I think. I would apologize to eveybody because I think they expected more from me and they didn't expect this kind of video as far as the tone goes. What I was thinking, which I've done many times in the past was that this was going to be a funny video as well. It was going to make people laugh. Making fun of myself as a gamer has led to many fun stories for me.” When The Outline asked if the blowup over his Cuphead video made him want to stop writing about games, he said it had dampened his enthusiasm but that at the end of the day he’s “stuck with covering games because I enjoy interviewing people, and I enjoy playing the games they make.”


In case you’ve buried the memory, the genesis of Gamergate was based on lies about the sex life of a female game developer, who allegedly slept with someone who had reviewed her game. The movement snowballed from there, targeting new victims including feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian and games developer Brianna Wu, and picking up advocates like Milo Yiannopoulos, the tech editor for Breitbart who had already made a name for himself as a culture warrior and right-wing internet shock jock. It turned out Gamergate was never about “ethics in gaming journalism” as its adherents claimed, but more about a way for self-identified gamers to release their pent up stress and anxiety on whoever had crossed them that week. Gamergate moves from one inflated faux scandal to the next in the name of “ethics in games journalism” while keeping its sights fixed on its real targets: feminists and those who are part of or interested in the indie games scene. This pattern of escalation has played out repeatedly since then. Pizzagate. The Ghostbusters backlash. Donald Trump.

Now, with Takahashi, Gamergate is returning to the fake controversy of its origins: ethics in video games journalism. The debate is ostensibly, “Should video game journalists be good at video games?” but it’s more like, “Is it OK to unleash all the firepower of an angry mob against a video games journalist who is bad at a video game?” According to Takahashi’s critics, nothing could be more justified. And if the Gamergate pattern continues, his critics will be hungry for their next target soon.
 
It's part of the natural ecology of the forums.

Catparty posts articles about Gamergate.
hoodlolcow posts articles about sperg spunk
Null is constantly setting fire to shit.
First person to post "good" as a response earns an automatic 10 "Winner" ratings.
Blank doesn't know the concept of "terse."
And Techpriest doesn't even own a hat.

Circle of life, baby. Catch that goddamn lion, Morty. We need to make a trilogy.
 
I can't imagine why anyone might be made fun of for being absolute shit at their job. This has never happened before in history, except I heard the Nazis killed millions of Jews by making jokes about them. It's obviously the reincarnation of Hitler.
 
I can't imagine why anyone might be made fun of for being absolute shit at their job. This has never happened before in history, except I heard the Nazis killed millions of Jews by making jokes about them. It's obviously the reincarnation of Hitler.
Video games involve killing, Hitler killed people, Q.E.D.
 
1. If you're going to be working in the video game industry, you should at least be competent at playing games. It's not rocket science.

2. The "alt-right" isn't real. It's a blanket term that was originally coined for Richard Spencer, an ethnic nationalist whose very existence triggers far-left people. Now it's used for basically anyone who is even remotely right-wing, even if they are moderately so or support a candidate who is moderately so.

3. "Muh cyberbullying" There's no such thing as cyberbullying. As Tyler the Creator said, "Get away from the screen, like nigga, close your eyes."

The right-wing movement didn't start because of Gamergate. It started before that, with the rise of the surveillance state Obama's administration created (along with its many other corrupt deeds). And it has only increased more due to witnessing political violence. Studies have shown that witnessing political violence makes countries more right-wing.

Whether ethics in journalism or simply speaking against regressive leftists for the first time are the reasons to support Gamergate, both are fine and valid. It's the Internet. Do you think people won't talk shit or tell people to kill themselves just because you didn't do anything that warrants it? I do agree, though. It was very frustrating to see him trying to play the game.

Also, you're wrong about the origins of Gamergate. To put it simply, the actually backed-up "rumors" regarding Zoe Quinn's sex life were real. She and her friends thought that most gamers were talking about it when it was actually just a small group of people. This led to her and her connections shit-talking the player community as a whole, calling them sexist and misogynistic.
As I said, Gamergate was both about ethics in journalism and fighting against the regressive Left, as it showed just how inter-connected video game journalists and the outlets are, and how said regressive leftists became more and more influential in these outlets and in media and culture, overall.
The people who were part of Gamergate weren't a mob mentality. They simply were interested in how corrupt these journalists were. Calling Internet shit talking "harassment" is going a little too far. You have the ability to block people, or to just walk away from the screen.

As for the other two cases, the backlash against the new Ghostbusters was that it was unoriginal and an obvious cash-grab, as well as being SJW propaganda, which people were already tired of.
Trump won because they didn't want corrupt/incompetent people like Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Bernie Sanders, or Hillary Clinton winning the election and turning the country to shit. They were tired of the identity politics, of neoconservatives and neoliberals, the lack of law enforcement, and the growing anti-white, anti-America, anti-men sentiments.

Basically, you're grasping at straws. You're claiming that people making fun of or shit-talking some guy for being bad at games in an industry in which he is expected to be at least competent with them is some right-wing conspiracy, and that's r.etarded. Fuck off. (Sorry for the wall of text.)
 
Last edited:
I can't imagine why anyone might be made fun of for being absolute shit at their job. This has never happened before in history, except I heard the Nazis killed millions of Jews by making jokes about them. It's obviously the reincarnation of Hitler.

271,301 people, who died of starvation and typhus, according to the Red Cross. And those who starved to death did so because the Allies destroyed German supply vehicles who were delivering food to the concentration camps. Muh six million is a lie.
 
It's part of the natural ecology of the forums.

Catparty posts articles about Gamergate.
hoodlolcow posts articles about sperg spunk
Null is constantly setting fire to shit.
First person to post "good" as a response earns an automatic 10 "Winner" ratings.
Blank doesn't know the concept of "terse."
And Techpriest doesn't even own a hat.

Circle of life, baby. Catch that goddamn lion, Morty. We need to make a trilogy.

Irrelevant, but Rick and Morty is shit only pseudointellectual Redditors like.
 
1. If you're going to be working in the video game industry, you should at least be competent at playing games. It's not rocket science.

2. The "alt-right" isn't real. It's a blanket term that was originally coined for Richard Spencer, an ethnic nationalist whose very existence triggers far-left people. Now it's used for basically anyone who is even remotely right-wing, even if they are moderately so or support a candidate who is moderately so.

3. "Muh cyberbullying" There's no such thing as cyberbullying. As Tyler the Creator said, "Get away from the screen, like nigga, close your eyes."

The right-wing movement didn't start because of Gamergate. It started before that, with the rise of the surveillance state Obama's administration created (along with its many other corrupt deeds). And it has only increased more due to witnessing political violence. Studies have shown that witnessing political violence makes countries more right-wing.

Whether ethics in journalism or simply speaking against regressive leftists for the first time are the reasons to support Gamergate, both are fine and valid. It's the Internet. Do you think people won't talk shit or tell people to kill themselves just because you didn't do anything that warrants it? I do agree, though. It was very frustrating to see him trying to play the game.

Also, you're wrong about the origins of Gamergate. To put it simply, the actually backed-up "rumors" regarding Zoe Quinn's sex life were real. She and her friends thought that most gamers were talking about it when it was actually just a small group of people. This led to her and her connections shit-talking the player community as a whole, calling them sexist and misogynistic.
As I said, Gamergate was both about ethics in journalism and fighting against the regressive Left, as it showed just how inter-connected video game journalists and the outlets are, and how said regressive leftists became more and more influential in these outlets and in media and culture, overall.
The people who were part of Gamergate weren't a mob mentality. They simply were interested in how corrupt these journalists were. Calling Internet shit talking "harassment" is going a little too far. You have the ability to block people, or to just walk away from the screen.

As for the other two cases, the backlash against the new Ghostbusters was that it was unoriginal and an obvious cash-grab, as well as being SJW propaganda, which people were already tired of.
Trump won because they didn't want corrupt/incompetent people like Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Bernie Sanders, or Hillary Clinton winning the election and turning the country to shit. They were tired of the identity politics, of neoconservatives and neoliberals, the lack of law enforcement, and the growing anti-white, anti-America, anti-men sentiments.

Basically, you're grasping at straws. You're claiming that people making fun of or shit-talking some guy for being bad at games in an industry in which he is expected to be at least competent with them is some right-wing conspiracy, and that's r.etarded. Fuck off. (Sorry for the wall of text.)
lol calm down
 
The funny thing here is just this overblown article about an idiot getting mad about being told "you suck" when his job is to criticize shit other people do. Maybe if you're a critic yourself, you should just fucking suck it up when you fuck up. Did Uwe Boll start crying and moaning about the alt-right, imaginary boogeymen from Gamergate, and somehow, Donald Trump, whenever his latest awful movie got trashed?

No, he went and kicked Lowtax's ass.
 
The funny thing here is just this overblown article about an idiot getting mad about being told "you suck" when his job is to criticize shit other people do. Maybe if you're a critic yourself, you should just fucking suck it up when you fuck up. Did Uwe Boll start crying and moaning about the alt-right, imaginary boogeymen from Gamergate, and somehow, Donald Trump, whenever his latest awful movie got trashed?

No, he went and kicked Lowtax's ass.
lowtax deserved it tbh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back