Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes Black Widow is a Super Hero. It's hinted at in the movies but not explicitly said. She is the product of a Soviet super soldier program. That's what is really going on in that "sterilization scene. The point is Hawkeye is the only normie. That's what his family life represents. But Bob doesn't know that. (If he did he would be screaming it.) It would require some actual knowledge of the characters beyond a superficial gynecology.
That could also explain why she is able to take down opponents larger than her even though she's not Wonder Woman levels of superhuman. However that would require Bob to do research on the character as you stated.
 

Let me unpack this mess a bit:
1. Bobby laments not having tech majors learn Humanities is causing their lack of empathy; they fail to understand a company needs a female CEO to run.
2. He uses Steve Jobs as an example: the man was a selfish brat, but also knew how to sell things.
3. Technology is stagnant, not because of any lack of scientific breakthrough or research funding, but because people don't know how to sell things.
4. So techs should learn Marketing (in addition to Humanities), in order to innovate.

Pense's rabbit is adorable. Will have him for VP again.
 
Last edited:
Well he would probably "sigh" then say nothing about it as he cannot refute the facts. Bob wishes he could be Gurularry, as the latter is talented, informative, and fun with his videos whereas Bob comes across as misinformed, bitter, and like a hack.

Speaking of a more direct attack towards Bob's ego by other YouTubers, Pan-Pizza of RebelTaxi and friends make fun of Bob and The Game Overthinker in general. (Timestamped)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHlgRYOwUlM&t=9m23s
 
So obviously, the people not in those highlighted areas don't deserve to vote! Wait...
Votahs.JPG


So, Bob thinks he's a meteorologist now.
Meterologist.JPG


A British man playing a Texan. Grade-A casting, TVExecutiveBob!
TVsBob.JPG


Will "Punisher Avatar" join the ranks of "Anime Avatar" and "Deadpool Avatar"?
Punisher.JPG
 
Will "Punisher Avatar" join the ranks of "Anime Avatar" and "Deadpool Avatar"?
View attachment 281368
They already made Frank Castle into a Hydra guy for Secret Empire, Bob. You should know this as an "expert". Not that it matters now since that story is over and all but they already painted him as metaphor for one of those Nazis of AmeriKKKa that got Trump elected.

A company wouldn't even be responsible for that. It'd be like Disney getting fucked over because someone shoots up a place in a Mickey Mouse mask.
 
Last edited:
They already made Frank Castle into a Hydra guy for Secret Empire, Bob. You should know this as an "expert". Not that it matters now since they story is over and all but they already painted him as metaphor for one of those Nazis of AmeriKKKa that got Trump elected.

A company wouldn't even be responsible for that. It'd be like Disney getting fucked over because someone shoots up a place in a Mickey Mouse mask.
Or to use a real life example, that whole thing with Jodie Foster and that gunman.
 
Remember Bob and other Social Justice Warriors like him only care if it seems like a white male is in the wrong. It doesn't matter if they deny horrible events in history like having certain Islamic countries teaching Holocaust denial, denial of Nanking, or other genuinely disgusting things because only white people must be castigated for their wrongdoings legitimate or not. Bob is a terrible hypocrite and a terrible person as how the hell else would this authoritarian jackass get 700 pages on Kiwifarms with no sign of stopping.

It's hard to pinpoint exactly where Asians fall on the official Oppression Rankings(tm). On the one hand there's retards like Suey Pork and the folks who got mad that at that Chinese Matt Damon movie who think Asians are just as oppressed as blacks and Muslims while on the other there's people who call anime characters white and whine about there being too many Japanese people in this videogame series about the fucking Yakuza.
 
His continual inability to correctly use your/you're there/their/they're while impugning the intelligence of millions will never not be infuriating.

I'd like to throw its vs. it's onto that pile if I may.

Or to use a real life example, that whole thing with Jodie Foster and that gunman.

To this day I remain sorely disappointed that they didn't ban The Catcher in the Rye over Mark Chapman shooting Lennon. Fuck you, Holden Caulfield, you whiny piece of shit.

It's hard to pinpoint exactly where Asians fall on the official Oppression Rankings(tm). On the one hand there's exceptional individuals like Suey Pork and the folks who got mad that at that Chinese Matt Damon movie who think Asians are just as oppressed as blacks and Muslims while on the other there's people who call anime characters white and whine about there being too many Japanese people in this videogame series about the fucking Yakuza.

There's also the matter of growing evidence that affirmative action policies quite deliberately make it more difficult for Asians to get into higher education, which is enough to make you wonder why they keep voting Democrat if they're so smart. Regardless, bring that little nugget up to your favorite SJW for some quality spluttering and REEEEing.
 
So, Bob thinks he's a meteorologist now.

Forget meteorology. He doesn't understand statistics and modeling either.
http://stuff-that-irks-me.tumblr.co...150-billion-misfire-how-disaster-modelers-got
The process is similar to the process used for weather prediction but much less accurate. That’s because climate models run over much longer periods so they have to use larger chunks or they run out of computer power. The weather models become too inaccurate to predict local or regional weather in just a few days. The climate models are less accurate.
. . .
we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled nonlinear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.
 
Last edited:
Weren't they worried about the next ice age back in the 80s? That was less than 50 years ago. I guess algos and models can change but that means the models that bob is refering to can and will change too.
 
Weren't they worried about the next ice age back in the 80s? That was less than 50 years ago. I guess algos and models can change but that means the models that bob is refering to can and will change too.

Minor powerlevel but I've been involved in very basic modelling projects for biological cycles (not related to climate).
If you're attempting to model something that's well understood in terms of how it functions then your model will change much more slowly and generally won't change much at all, perhaps some values will be tweaked slightly over time to be more precise etc but fundamentally the model won't change.

On the other hand if you're attempting to model something with many variables and causes such as climate then your models SHOULD be changing constantly to reflect improved understandings in any of the 100's of factors your model might include. Even very basic and broad models should be updated to improve their accuracy - if a basic model proves to be basically accurate then it should be added to so that it becomes more complex and a better reflection of reality. The stuff I was involved in had maybe 7 or 8 variables which weren't constants, tweaking the value of those variables could produce hugely different results depending on what numbers you used - we're not even talking huge tweaks here, changing a value from 1.5 to 1.8 (both perfectly reasonable values depending on which data set you used) could change the functionality of the system completely, from a system experiencing strong positive growth to a system experiencing catastrophic collapse.


Bob definitely doesn't understand this, he thinks there's a big science machine where men in lab coats put in numbers about rain, pollution and heat and get a neat little graph as an output. A graph which should be treated as holy scripture and never questioned to any serious degree.
 
Minor powerlevel but I've been involved in very basic modelling projects for biological cycles (not related to climate).
If you're attempting to model something that's well understood in terms of how it functions then your model will change much more slowly and generally won't change much at all, perhaps some values will be tweaked slightly over time to be more precise etc but fundamentally the model won't change.

On the other hand if you're attempting to model something with many variables and causes such as climate then your models SHOULD be changing constantly to reflect improved understandings in any of the 100's of factors your model might include. Even very basic and broad models should be updated to improve their accuracy - if a basic model proves to be basically accurate then it should be added to so that it becomes more complex and a better reflection of reality. The stuff I was involved in had maybe 7 or 8 variables which weren't constants, tweaking the value of those variables could produce hugely different results depending on what numbers you used - we're not even talking huge tweaks here, changing a value from 1.5 to 1.8 (both perfectly reasonable values depending on which data set you used) could change the functionality of the system completely, from a system experiencing strong positive growth to a system experiencing catastrophic collapse.

this is very true: and seeing as the atmosphere is a staggeringly complex set of interconnected physical systems that makes a ball of spaghetti look simple, it's not surprising that its long-term behaviour is difficult to predict
 
Minor powerlevel but I've been involved in very basic modelling projects for biological cycles (not related to climate).
If you're attempting to model something that's well understood in terms of how it functions then your model will change much more slowly and generally won't change much at all, perhaps some values will be tweaked slightly over time to be more precise etc but fundamentally the model won't change.

On the other hand if you're attempting to model something with many variables and causes such as climate then your models SHOULD be changing constantly to reflect improved understandings in any of the 100's of factors your model might include. Even very basic and broad models should be updated to improve their accuracy - if a basic model proves to be basically accurate then it should be added to so that it becomes more complex and a better reflection of reality. The stuff I was involved in had maybe 7 or 8 variables which weren't constants, tweaking the value of those variables could produce hugely different results depending on what numbers you used - we're not even talking huge tweaks here, changing a value from 1.5 to 1.8 (both perfectly reasonable values depending on which data set you used) could change the functionality of the system completely, from a system experiencing strong positive growth to a system experiencing catastrophic collapse.


Bob definitely doesn't understand this, he thinks there's a big science machine where men in lab coats put in numbers about rain, pollution and heat and get a neat little graph as an output. A graph which should be treated as holy scripture and never questioned to any serious degree.

1) cooling was the thing in the 70s.

2) as someone once pointed out. His dewliness is totally correct, things will be updated and changed with new data. The problem is no matter how much things change, the proposed solutions have stayed the same. Funny that.
 
1) cooling was the thing in the 70s.

2) as someone once pointed out. His dewliness is totally correct, things will be updated and changed with new data. The problem is no matter how much things change, the proposed solutions have stayed the same. Funny that.

Well it is because they want "green" tech so badly even though alot of green tech is rather polluting in the industrial process of making it, but I guess Bob doesn't know what goes into making a hotdog, let alone an Iphone, solar panels, electric car batteries. I honestly believe that these technologies are good to have, but they are merely part of the solution
 
Well it is because they want "green" tech so badly even though alot of green tech is rather polluting in the industrial process of making it, but I guess Bob doesn't know what goes into making a hotdog, let alone an Iphone, solar panels, electric car batteries. I honestly believe that these technologies are good to have, but they are merely part of the solution

Well we do need green tech to power our spaceships so we can go to other planest and take their oil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back