Inactive Jonathan Ross / EffinRawz / SonicJonathanSonic / SuperJonathanSonic / SpeedDemon - Self-Admitted Pedophile with Homicidal Urges; featuring Ruby (EdgeQueen) & NuclearGamer

Status
Not open for further replies.
If this PUK ten years from now is hunting for 16 year olds to screw in real life or watch nude videos online then yeah PUK has a fucking issue and likely needs to be put in a cell. Still going after video of a 16 year old while 19 year and be open up about doing so is just going to raise trouble for you. Did this Neil say it was a mistake and he shouldn't have done it in reflection or was he stupid about defending it? If he defended hunting for the video then yeah there could be a problem with the guy. Maybe not as severe as Ross but still something one shouldn't confess in public or even in private unless done in a certain way.

I fuck 16 year olds irl.
 
ah under the law those videos of her prior to her turning 18 are child porn. people that post videos or photos of 16 year olds in the buff or in sexual acts get charged with various criminal offenses. you don't put that shit online or anywhere nor do you go out looking to watch it. honestly the barely legal thing is legit creepy as to whom the audience is.
I am not speaking exclusively of legalities, as this was covered in my opening of "The only reason the porn industry declared possession of videos featuring her "underage content" was to cover their ass against litigation."
The issue is highly ambiguous in the US. By legal rationale, a person is pure as the driven snow fucking a 16-year-old in New Jersey but they should be thrown in a cell for 30 years if doing the same action a mile across the border in New York. Again, that may in fact be the case legally but surely the ambiguity is clear.
Neal declaring that Puk looking at a 16-year-old from 35 years ago is in the same category as Ross who has feelings for naked toddlers in tubs is utter nonsense.
 
This thread is like watching a documentary of maturing infant spiders that eat their parent.

In this case congratz on your baby's first day out the nest Neal.

How far does has this tard-cancer spread? I doubt Ross is patient zero--He, Nuclear Death Plow, and Edgy-Hole were just the first to be identified with the affliction. Now it looks like a pandemic spreading among anyone who's a part of this exceptional group of future drug overdoses, prison inmates, suicides and meth-addicted prostitutes.
 
How far does has this tard-cancer spread? I doubt Ross is patient zero--He, Nuclear Death Plow, and Edgy-Hole were just the first to be identified with the affliction. Now it looks like a pandemic spreading among anyone who's a part of this exceptional group of future drugoverdoses, prison inmates, suicides and meth-addicted prostitutes.
Autism has mutated to become an airborne phenomenon. CDC should probably get on that one.
 
So like. Here' smy statement on Puk. and it' sthe only one I'll make, I don't know who the fuck he is, nor do I care. He watched a 14 year old who fooled the industry. What he did is wrong, what Ross did is wrong. There is no good guy. Will it make you feel better if I say they should both kill themselves?
 
Last edited:
What he did is wrong, what Ross did is wrong. There is no good guy.
False equivalence. One was aroused by a physically mature teenager, like all healthy men are, and the other has "feelings" for prepubescent children. Traci Lords was 16 by the time she did her first video btw. Anyone in this forum that says they've never stolen a glance at a well endowed teenager while out shopping, etc is a fucking liar. Don't compare that with pedophilia, lest you seriously undermine what that word means.
 
False equivalence. One was aroused by a physically mature teenager, like all healthy men are, and the other has "feelings" for prepubescent children. Traci Lords was 16 by the time she did her first video btw. Anyone in this forum that says they've never stolen a glance at a well endowed teenager while out shopping, etc is a fucking liar. Don't compare that with pedophilia, lest you seriously undermine what that word means.

The passing glance on a teenager that then results in a quickly dismissed thought, is not in any way close to what the law says about watching a porno involving an underage participant. Nor is close as to what goes on in the head of any non fucked up in the head person.
 
The passing glance on a teenager that then results in a quickly dismissed thought, is not in any way close to what the law says about watching a porno involving an underage participant. Nor is close as to what goes on in the head of any non fucked up in the head person.

If you reported somebody to the police for watching three minutes of Deepthroat I can guarantee that they would hang up on you because nobody cares.
 
False equivalence. One was aroused by a physically mature teenager, like all healthy men are, and the other has "feelings" for prepubescent children. Traci Lords was 16 by the time she did her first video btw. Anyone in this forum that says they've never stolen a glance at a well endowed teenager while out shopping, etc is a fucking liar. Don't compare that with pedophilia, lest you seriously undermine what that word means.

I generally agree with what you say, and yeah. Everyone has stolen glances, most have probably wanted to fuck. I don't really care about Puk, nor do I care about people who go after 16+ y/o. I was in Highschool, I remember the stories of how they'd fuck adults. It's more those that look at those 13 and under that get to me. Those are the fuckin' scum.
 
again the legal issue is way to late too. if you were going to call police on someone of a crime 10 years ago and no public interest . they likely not be bothered and will just hang up. as for age of consent it varies country to country , and state to state . though would iI want to see someone underage or stuff like that then no . but if the argument of what neil was trying to state oh he is a pedo that is a no question at best the police could only go down child pornogaphy if he admitted at the time he still had it. which no one can prove he has or not. so the case be useless for them to get a warrant and still be hanged up not enough reasonable suspicion.


I know I do not like pedos. but the legal issue here is to late now. there are some cases that do get brought up but only when there is public interest ie the murder of mistress to jimmy snuka who he clearly murdered her with enough evidence and motive of him doing it . but that is more of reason to be bought up because of the legal issue.

overall neil little to late and as I said if you're assuming we all going to go after pedos wrong forum. we here to lol at people not be a grand stand against shit. and even if we did I would be against the issue that the above issue I percent.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back