Plagued Pedophiles and pedophilia apologists - Dear NSA agent reading this thread: WE DON'T CONDONE THIS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some things I don't really get with pedos, are they attracted to kids? Or just someone that looks like a kid? I don't understand what about kids they find attractive. Like would they do some girl who was 18 but didn't look 18? Or would them finding out that they were 18 turn them off?

Would they dump a girl once she aged like 5 years? Or what? Since they are pedos and are almost exclusively attracted to kids, then you'd think so right? I wonder if anyone has asked them those questions. It doesn't make sense to me at all.

I knew a chick that looked like a teenager through her 30's, she said she attracted all kinds of weirdos.
 
I was going to make a joke about "don't we already have a thread for crazy leftists/liberals? This is redundant".

But it's not really a joke. This pedophilia apologia is rampant amongst a political ideology that not so long ago loved to joke about the religious right being the protectors of child-rapists. And I don't get it. I really don't get it.

Remember friends, wanting to fuck a 14 year old is perfectly normal and don't judge. But if you smile at a grown woman on the sidewalk, you're guilty of propagating rape culture.
 
Diddling a kid is for all intents and purposes rape. People can say whatever about historic precedents and shit, but the fact is that children are too goddamned stupid to properly grasp the consequences involved in banging, and aren't able to give informed consent to it.

So, if it were possible to have an adult in a child's body (the old "3000 year old vampire in the body of a 12 year old" trope, for example) would you be OK with it?
 
I was going to make a joke about "don't we already have a thread for crazy leftists/liberals? This is redundant".

But it's not really a joke. This pedophilia apologia is rampant amongst a political ideology that not so long ago loved to joke about the religious right being the protectors of child-rapists. And I don't get it. I really don't get it.

Remember friends, wanting to fuck a 14 year old is perfectly normal and don't judge. But if you smile at a grown woman on the sidewalk, you're guilty of propagating rape culture.
Quite honestly, I feel the apologists are probably worse than the pedos themselves (though not by much, both are pretty much mentally r.etarded).

The big thing that gets to me is how they come off as people who seem to have their own skeletons in their closets. Hell, they could even be pedophiles themselves (think the likes of James Terry Mitchell Jr.). Especially with all the defenses like "She's totally an adult!" or "that kid totally consented!"
 
jjh5w6dxuxgy.jpg


PM3pIAs.jpg


This man sure is swell, from his campaign site:

"Nathan Larson is the neocameralist libertarian candidate in Virginia's 31st House of Delegates district election...

Larson promised, "I would allow each property owner in Virginia to decide whether he wants to have an age of consent or prohibitions against child pornography that are applicable on his property. I would not centrally impose such policies via the General Assembly. I think the market should be allowed to determine what policy will attract the most residents. What seems like predation to one person could seem like an exercise of free speech or a loving relationship to another."

https://www.larsonfordelegate.com/wiki/Main_Page
 
Last edited:
So, if it were possible to have an adult in a child's body (the old "3000 year old vampire in the body of a 12 year old" trope, for example) would you be OK with it?
No way I'm touching the honey but this is a concrete example of pedos. A pedo is attracted to the 3,000 year old vampire's child-body and should be culled. Jerry Seinfeld having a relationship with an overdeveloped teen is not the same thing.

So, I guess wanting to sex down with children is a spectrum.
 
So, if it were possible to have an adult in a child's body (the old "3000 year old vampire in the body of a 12 year old" trope, for example) would you be OK with it?

See that's what I don't get, if you like your partner to be small and petite to the extreme like a kid. Why not go for a 20 year old petite midget or something? Why kids? That's the thing I don't get. You can't have babies with a kid, you can't hold a meaningful conversation with a kid. And that's even before you even get into the social and legal implications.
 
See that's what I don't get, if you like your partner to be small and petite to the extreme like a kid. Why not go for a 20 year old petite midget or something? Why kids? That's the thing I don't get. You can't have babies with a kid, you can't hold a meaningful conversation with a kid. And that's even before you even get into the social and legal implications.

You are not thinking about it sociopathically enough, and good for you for it, really. These people think of their targets as what amounts to fleshlights with a pulse. You wouldn't develop a relationship with or have a lot of deep and meaningful conversations with a chair or a pasta strainer or sex toy.
 
You are not thinking about it sociopathically enough, and good for you for it, really. These people think of their targets as what amounts to fleshlights with a pulse. You wouldn't develop a relationship with or have a lot of deep and meaningful conversations with a chair or a pasta strainer or sex toy.

Oh so what you are saying is that it's more about preying on people that know won't know whats good for themselves? Unable to question things, unable to form opinions from experience or think outside the bubble around themselves? So control freaks in a sense? And they are trying to lie to people about this? Gas them.
 
crossing over from Yanderedev cow, who brings a classic excuse:
https://yanderedev.tumblr.com/post/138012889490/clearing-up-misunderstandings-part-4-a

dmDWQvD7SNKpd5yscAsp3g.png


>Pedophilia is a sxual orientation people can't control and we should feel sorry for pedos

But that has to be a lie, there are adults that are as small as children, some even are mistaken for children, but you still say you want to fuck only kids, so you must be lying out your ass. They aren't attracted to children, they are attracted to the idea of having a mini human pet to take home on a leash and fuck. What a lying scumbag.
 
Last edited:
Todd Nickerson was the first "big" public "MAP"/"non-offender" in the media with that infamous salon article, which is especially concerning if you actually bothered to read or watch his story. Todd claims he knew he had pedophillic urges by the time he was in his late-teens and yet decided to take a baby-sitting gig where he had to jerk off in the clients shower to keep said urges under control.

Hard for me to have sympathy for the man, especially when that sort of behaviour apparently makes you the fucking poster-childfucker of these "ethical pedophiles"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back