Plagued Pedophiles and pedophilia apologists - Dear NSA agent reading this thread: WE DON'T CONDONE THIS

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't seem to find it, but I saw a post floating around on Tumblr from a "non-offending MAP" about how they'd like to be interviewed by a news station such as FOX to tell the public how "safe" they are and that they need to be accepted. That's lovely; cannot believe we have to be politically correct for fucking pedophiles now. Calling them by what they really are hurts their feelings and attracts assblasted apologists, so now they want to be referred to as "minor attracted person(s)."

These Reddit screenshots are atrocious, but the safespace that Tumblr has created for these people is even worse. How have people regressed to the point that they have to argue as to whether or not pedophilia is moral?
 
Here is that Salon article. They took it down, but it is still archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/2016103.../2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/

For the sake of others and society as a whole, there are some liberties that we simply shouldn't have, regardless if we have problems that came to us without our will.

Holy shit, they actually took the article down. Guess its a relief that mindset is still resisted heavily.

How long its resisted for, thats another question.
 
Holy shit, they actually took the article down. Guess its a relief that mindset is still resisted heavily.

How long its resisted for, thats another question.

From what I remember the article was taken down because Salon was about to run articles accusing Milo Yianoppoulous of being a pedo because he had what he described as normal sexual encounters with older men as a teen.
 
Last edited:
Look, my position on pedophiles is not remotely nuanced:
Hang them. Publicly. Leave their bodies as a warning to others who would similarly transgress.
No mercy for kidfuckers.

We can spend all day waffling about whether it should be 18 or 17 or 45, but this shit is not complicated. In the US, you are considered an adult at 18. You can vote, be drafted, and drive. This is a logical place to also place age of consent.
People who want it lowered do so because they have some kind of vested interest in having it lowered. We have Romeo and Juliet laws for the few fringe cases that may be more complicated, but in the end this is some straightforward shit that we're pretending is more complicated than it actually is.

I don't particularly give a shit if you were "born this way" or "have never offended". Many serial killers were "born that way" due to problems in their brain chemistry. Meth heads often have a family history of addiction, and a tendency towards addictive behavior.
Lot of people are born shitty. It does not mean we should have to hand wave their shit and just put up with fucking predators.
The risk someone like that poses to a child supersedes their personal problems.
 
Last edited:
Look, my position on pedophiles is not remotely nuanced:
Hang them. Publicly. Leave their bodies as a warning to others who would similarly transgress.
No mercy for kidfuckers.
No we shouldn't hang them.

When the English created the first Age of Consent laws they would have people who fucked kids be in cages at public places and they would starve to death in front of everyone.
 
The fucking mental gymnastics these people go through to defend their crackpot beliefs are insane. The people who try to justify beating off to loli/young looking characters by saying that they're actually 18 ought to realize how void of logic that argument is-- when you jack off, age is probably the last thing on your mind--you're getting off to their body.
 
So, if it were possible to have an adult in a child's body (the old "3000 year old vampire in the body of a 12 year old" trope, for example) would you be OK with it?

a) 3000 year olds are probably too busy mumbling esoteric formulae to be pursuing relationships
b) why would you ever want a 12-year-old body, that's weak as heck
c) in addition it also makes them eternal paedobait so good luck to them as they dodge paedophiles left and right
 
No way I'm touching the honey but this is a concrete example of pedos. A pedo is attracted to the 3,000 year old vampire's child-body and should be culled. Jerry Seinfeld having a relationship with an overdeveloped teen is not the same thing.

So, I guess wanting to sex down with children is a spectrum.

I have to wonder how many of them would love to have a real life version of Claudia from Interview With The Vampire.

They used to call this The Sasami Clause. Is she's physically a child but so ancient that she's no longer chronologically a child then it's totally ok to fap to her. It doesn't matter if she still has the mind of a child. She's centuries or millennia old. Therefore technically an adult.

Claudia eventually became an adult mentally. And she hated her body because she could never become a grown up woman.

Anyone who constantly whines about age of consent needing to be lowered because 13 year old girls are better and more fertile than adult women is a pedo. No matter what kind of excuse they give in the end they want the laws changed so they can prey upon children because adult women see them for the creeps they are and steer clear.

Todd Nickerson was the first "big" public "MAP"/"non-offender" in the media with that infamous salon article, which is especially concerning if you actually bothered to read or watch his story. Todd claims he knew he had pedophillic urges by the time he was in his late-teens and yet decided to take a baby-sitting gig where he had to jerk off in the clients shower to keep said urges under control.

Hard for me to have sympathy for the man, especially when that sort of behaviour apparently makes you the fucking poster-childfucker of these "ethical pedophiles"

That's like saying "I babysit kids that I wanted to fuck but fapped my urges away in the shower instead of fucking them. I deserve a cookie and a medal".

No you don't. You took that job because it gave you access to children. Even if you never thought about actually touching them you still fapped off your urges in the shower belonging to people who trusted you with their children. Every one of those kids is extremely lucky and could have easily become a victim. That doesn't make you commendable. It just means that no children were harmed that time but the future isn't exactly set in stone when you have a serious sexual deviancy that puts vulnerable children in harms way everywhere you go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back