Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Purple Panther]

5 star kind of guy, Mike? Like the Amazon review?

 

[Supreme Sundae]

TRANSLATION:

When he interviewed for this job, he was asked about his book, and told he'd be committing libel if he published. He lied, said he wasn't going to, no, and got the job on the implied promise that he wouldn't publish. Whence the delay in publication, and the relative silence about it.

His first day, he publishes.

The next day, the office manager calls him in, tells him he's fired, and explains that if he can't be trusted to keep his word on something like that, how can they trust him with sensitive client information? How can they know that he won't just turn around and use it? They require him to turn in his mop and bucket and have security escort him out.

...Ten bucks says that's how it went.

Nah, they just read the absolutely true part in his book (which is ALL of it, right, Russ?) where he clicks on a rando link at work (from a stranger that calls him "Shitlips", no less) and infects the entire office with a light-flickering virus. They can't risk their client's files and the office light blubs.

 

[Barrister]

Greer's argument is astounding

A duty to do what? Everything?

The definition he put there is technically from the definition for 'Duty' from Black's. But it's the first sentence, and the definition is a paragraph long. More importantly, he conveniently leaves out the 'scope' and 'responsibility' parts of the definition, probably because even if Swift had a duty it definitely wasn't to Greer.

You can only sue for misrepresentation if it's fraudulent, i.e. done knowingly and with intent. It's sort of scary that Greer was ever allowed to work as a paralegal.

Doing something for one person under one set of circumstances and not doing that same thing for a different person under different circumstances isn't misrepresentation.

This is the most alarming part of his 'argument.' It's true that someone could accidentally induce someone else to do something. That by itself does not constitute misrepresentation, because there's something called the "reasonable person standard." For this case, it's only misrepresentation if it would induce any reasonable person to do something. Greer is not a reasonable person. This is likely why the Judge threw out his claim so quickly.
It's really too bad that, by his own admission, he zoned out in court when the Judge started explaining these basic concepts to him. He could have learned something.

 

[SwiftlyRuiningRussell]

I love how he believes his own lies. No worries Shitlips! It's documented here for integrity purposes. His suicide threat wasn't meant to be private. He even utilized the green background which can't be done on FB messenger. Someone is begging for attention, and figured Taylor Swift herself would see it and come knowing on his door today.

Oh wait...he doesn't even own a door.

 

[sharshorita]

Haha, nobody raised their eyebrows. Every single person who saw that post thought the same thing: "that's for attention" and kept scrolling.




Edit: And that's about as good an excuse as "my account was hacked!"

 

[PuddleOfDrool]

Haha, nobody raised their eyebrows. Every single person who saw that post thought the same thing: "that's for attention" and kept scrolling.

Edit: And that's about as good an excuse as "my account was hacked!"

I promised myself I'd stop following RG's antics when he ended up shooting someone. I didn't expect it'd be himself though.

Then again I doubt he'd have the guts to actually go through with it and make the world a safer place.

 

[Barbarella]

The unemployment rate in Utah is 3.5% right now. It's really hard to not find someone to hire you at that rate. It probably was a pretty rinky dink place that desperately needed someone and then found out he was completely insane afterwards. It's a right to work state, so there really isn't a good reason not to try someone out for a few days if you really, really need someone. That's my theory anyway.

A right to work state just means that nobody can be compelled to join a union. It definitely doesn’t mean that anybody has to hire or try-out a weird, litigious freak, especially in a company that deals with sensitive information, even if you are only cleaning the toilet. You never know what papers get left on a desk or what people may talk about with the janitor around.

Rusty has rendered a nearly useless paralegal degree to be completely useless. Nobody wants a serial lawsuit-filer to work for them, so Rusty is likely going to be unemployed for a while.

 

[This Fucking Guy]

I love how he believes his own lies. No worries Shitlips! It's documented here for integrity purposes. His suicide threat wasn't meant to be private. He even utilized the green background which can't be done on FB messenger. Someone is begging for attention, and figured Taylor Swift herself would see it and come knowing on his door today.

Oh wait...he doesn't even own a door.

View attachment 312532

And he doesn't have any friends, as evidenced by...

Haha, nobody raised their eyebrows. Every single person who saw that post thought the same thing: "that's for attention" and kept scrolling.

Didn't he try the suicide angle with Olivia, too, when his pathetic pleading failed?

Someone is begging for attention, and figured Taylor Swift herself would see it and come knowing on his door today.

Perhaps he expects her to turn up and marreeeeeeeeee him?

 

[An Sionnach Seang]

sexy British audiobook, part 4 (scousers' delight)
this is the best one yet - I struggled not to laugh reading Ken's lines, the bit at 11:00 and "it sounds like flipping Sesame Street"

 

[This Fucking Guy]

View attachment 312507
It's really too bad that, by his own admission, he zoned out in court when the Judge started explaining these basic concepts to him. He could have learned something.

His delusion is a frail thing and he absolutely needs to exert total control over his 'bubble', so any form of input that contradicts his rather puerile worldview is lost in his inner white noise. He will simply never take good advice or learn from his mistakes. Great for entertainment purposes, worrisome for people he can contact either online or physically.

I am way too lazy to prepare the comparison, however @sharshorita prepared the rather splendid court transcription for the very court case that he talks about in his 'book' so when the two are compared you can clearly see just how delusional he is.

To any rational person reading the transcription, the judge is clear and lucid in his explanation and advice, and I personally feel he treats Russhole with much more respect than he deserves.

In Russy's world? THEY'RE ALL MEANIES AND THEY LAUGHED AT ME AND DANCED AROUND ME AND SNIGGERED AND DISCRIMINATED AND HURT MY FEEFEES!

Like many KF's, I have real concerns about him. I really don't know if he would be capable of a shooting, but I do know he is a very frustrated little man with terrible insecurities and anger issues. And of course, N.P.D.

 

[fuckingf STUPId idiot]

It's true that someone could accidentally induce someone else to do something. That by itself does not constitute misrepresentation, because there's something called the "reasonable person standard."

Exactly. Nobody else on planet earth sees Taylor Swift being nice to fans and expects the same for themselves. Sure I think she's pulling publicity stunts but that doesn't mean she owes him!

 

[XxxwernxxX]

People serious about suicide almost always don't broadcast it, or tell anyone for that matter.
Hey Russ. You think hundreds of people are wrong. One day you're gonna have to face it. Your actions are NOT normal. One Google of you and a potential employer can see your unhealthy obsession with TS and your 3 time history of trying to sue someone. All people do here is post what you say. So if KF is effecting your life it's ultimately because of your actions.

KF isn't affecting his life, we're just logging it. Nothing disappears on the internet Russell. He shit his own life away, and he's not suicidal, he's begging for sex again. If he was serious, he'd just do it, but as far as I know he's too pussy for anything except maybe an OD, but, Mormon and all that.

 

[SwiftlyRuiningRussell]

Why does this girl's profile photo look so familiar? I feel like he's posted this image before when calling out a girl who refused to fuck him.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

A right to work state just means that nobody can be compelled to join a union. It definitely doesn’t mean that anybody has to hire or try-out a weird, litigious freak, especially in a company that deals with sensitive information, even if you are only cleaning the toilet. You never know what papers get left on a desk or what people may talk about with the janitor around.

Rusty has rendered a nearly useless paralegal degree to be completely useless. Nobody wants a serial lawsuit-filer to work for them, so Rusty is likely going to be unemployed for a while.

It also means you can fire someone with out giving any reason or cause. @sharshorita was just saying it doesn’t hurt to hire/try anyone out for a day or two at a job b/c you can just fire their ass without any worry or repercussion.

Though with Russ I wouldn’t even take the chance in a RTW state because he could still try a groundless suit for discrimination. Given his numerous firings and litigious nature it’s rather shocking he hasn’t. Probably has something to do with little man actually having to face men he’s suing in person and in court rather than attention seeking from a hot celebrity women.

 

[Guy Smiley]

So, I wrote a review. I was trying not to be a troll, I tried to look at the book objectively. What really stuck out to me is the absurdity of Russell's argument, if you really stop to think about it.
I was going to make a burner account to post it, but you have to buy something with the burner account, and honestly, that's more effort than I'm willing to put into this. If someone else wants to post it, be my guest.

------
I'm going to ignore the terrible grammar, the abysmal writing, the awful attempt at storytelling, and the jokes that are absolutely not funny.

Actually, no, I am going to talk about the jokes.

Put very simply, Greer's jokes left me frozen in disbelief.
(See, this is funny, because Greer has facial paralysis, so his face is permanently frozen, and the humor is compounded because this is a reference to the fact that Greer stops to explain every single joke in his book, which is, yes, INCREDIBLY OBNOXIOUS.)
(Oh, and I know that joke was dumb, but believe me, his jokes are worse.)

But enough about the writing, I want to talk about the IDEAS in this book.

In this book, Russel Greer argues that celebrities, (most notably Taylor Swift) owe a duty to their fans and should be held legally responsible for not living up to that duty. Let us assume, for the moment, that he is correct. In this world he has created, Taylor Swift becomes either a slave, a shut in, or a pauper.
If Taylor Swift does a nice gesture for any of her fans, Greer argues that she has a responsibility to do such for ALL of her fans.
This idea has a lot of problems. Let's start with the obvious one: Taylor Swift does not have the time or the means to respond to every gift she receives. Her fanbase is massive, and there simply wouldn't be enough hours in the day to do something meaningful for each of them. Never mind the fact that people like Greer would come out of the woodwork to attempt to purchase her time and affection.
Nevertheless, Greer argues that because he wrote her a song, she has a responsibility to respond to him. But let's assume that Greer's dream comes true and they speed off to the nearest Coldstone to have a PG-13 date. When the next Swift suitor shows up with a song, by Greer's argument, she would have to drop everything and run off with him, leaving Greer once again, sad and alone.
Oh, and the song, let's not forget the song. By gifting her a song, Greer has made yet another effort to enslave Taylor Swift. You see, if she even listens to his song, and if Greer can prove it, and then if she creates another song and Greer can prove that it is even slightly influenced by his song, then he can, once again, sue her for royalties. This is why artists aren't allowed to accept unsolicited music, even if the author claims that it's just a gift to prove that he "gets her." On multiple occasions, Greer stops to sneer at the gift of 1,989 paper cranes a fan sent to Taylor Swift. Believe it or not, Mister Greer, that gift was much better than yours - The cranes may have been useless, but your song was useless AND potentially harmful.
So that's the first potential outcome of Mister Greer's argument: That Taylor Swift, and all celebrities, essentially become slaves to their fans after the first time they do anything nice for their admirers. They become completely beholden to their every whim, even when those whims disagree. (Imagine the blowup when ten Russel Greers show up at Taylor's door with "beautiful" songs to convince her how much they "get her!")
The second outcome is that Taylor Swift simply refuses to do anything nice for her fans ever again. After all, if she can be legally held to a standard that insists that she must replicate one nice gesture for every fan, then why would she do anything nice for anyone? Greer's argument is basically that no good deed should go unpunished. If you go on a date with one person, you must now go date everyone - Taylor Swift becomes the concubine to the world. Why on Earth would any sane human being put themselves through that?
Oh, and the third outcome is the nuclear option. Suppose some other lonely, desperate man decides he wants to woo Taylor Swift? What is she supposed to do, drop Greer and go with him? Doesn't that then open her back up to a liability claim from Greer? What happens when a third, fourth, or fifth litigious suitor arrives? This can only end with Swift buried under a pile of lawsuits, penniless, and living under a bridge.
If we draw the argument of Greer's book to it's conclusion, this is where we end up. Swift is either a slave to her fans, working day and night to meet her every whim, or she withdraws from the public eye and does nothing nice for anyone, ever again, or she gets buried under a pile of Greer inspired lawsuits.

It's fortunate that no one was willing to take Greer seriously.

But his book is a good cautionary tale about the power of delusion. Two stars.
---

 

[Wonder Woman]

Why does this girl's profile photo look so familiar? I feel like he's posted this image before when calling out a girl who refused to fuck him.

View attachment 312568

I could very easily be wrong, but isn't those the girl that warned the Nevada brothels about him? I can't remember her real name but her working name was along the lines of Cassie Devine.

 

[SwiftlyRuiningRussell]

I could very easily be wrong, but isn't those the girl that warned the Nevada brothels about him? I can't remember her real name but her working name was along the lines of Cassie Devine.

Possibly. My first thought was the girl he claimed wanted to partner with him in his brothel case but I could be wrong. I know I've seen this photo before though.

 

[mochaman]

Hey guys. Been following Russ's antics since last year and lurking this thread since its inception, but had to sign up as I think I might have been the only one who caught this. Happened to refresh his Facebook page at just the right moment - it was gone and replaced with a non-watermarked version a minute later.

 

[Barbarella]

Rusty always seems to use pictures of beautiful girls as his fake accounts. Another dream gone wrong, thinking a ten would stick up for him.

It’s interesting you can pay five to write a review on linked in...is that a real account or what? I’m confused.

 

[LolCoolCat]

Hey guys. Been following Russ's antics since last year and lurking this thread since its inception, but had to sign up as I think I might have been the only one who caught this. Happened to refresh his Facebook page at just the right moment - it was gone and replaced with a non-watermarked version a minute later.

Winner, so he has found a positive review for something or someone else on LinkedIn and gone and pretended it was for him. What a Bamboon!