Should lolicon / shotacon be considered drawn child pornography?

[Picklepower]

In loli/shota there is an unspoken understanding that the characters are all actually immortal vampires who only look like children, but are actually 4000 years old.

 

[ICametoLurk]

If I recall, art is subjective.

Art is against the Holy Will of Allah.

 

[Medicated]

If I recall, art is subjective.

That reminds me of that news story about the guy that had some porno with some short petite flat chested girl in it, the police thought he had child porn, so the porn star had to come to the guys trial to prove she was eighteen during the filming. God that must've been fucking horrifying.

 

[DeadwastePrime]

yes

 

[A Hot Potato]

That reminds me of that news story about the guy that had some porno with some short petite flat chested girl in it, the police thought he had child porn, so the porn star had to come to the guys trial to prove she was eighteen during the filming. God that must've been fucking horrifying.

Did the news story say which porn that was?

Asking for a friend.

 

[Medicated]

Did the news story say which porn that was?

Asking for a friend.

Oh I found the news story

http://nypost.com/2010/04/24/a-trial-star-is-porn/

 

[A Hot Potato]

Oh I found the news story

View attachment 313788
http://nypost.com/2010/04/24/a-trial-star-is-porn/

Fuck the police.

Let us fap to our petite flat chest bitches!

 

[Medicated]

the fuck?

 

[Rand /pol/]

How bad is loli/shota really?
I myself am quite divided on the topic.

Firstly, I do recognize that any erotic material pertaining to children is bad because it proliferates the fantasies of sexually abusing children, causing pedophiles to be more likely to do it when they lose control.
But I also recognize that a lot of people enjoy loli and shota without being pedo irl nessecarily, so it's also a difficult question of perspective.

The law hasn't really ventured here, and most if not all discussion of the subject is just autistic whining about "it isn't real so it isn't real, i'm not hurting childs (yet)" vs. "bro ur just a pedo u filthy fucking pedos need to be shot".

I'd be interested to know your thoughts, because it keeps me up at night whether I should support the censorship of drawn CP vs. the acceptance of it.

It's still a child which still makes you a Pedophile, maybe not a Pedophile by the laws definition, but by the Dictionaries definition.

Definition of pedophilia ( By Merriam Webster):
sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object; specifically a psychiatric disorder in which an adult has sexual fantasies about or engages in sexual acts with a prepubescent child.

 

[Bryan Dunn]

Yes you fucking Degenerate Jesus Christ.

 

[Roast Chicken]

If someone likes to draw and get off to depictions of children in sexual situations them I don't want to be affiliated with them period. Yes, it makes you a paedophile. Get psychiatric help instead of feeding your potentially harmful degeneracy with drawings that probably required images of real children as reference.

the fuck?

View attachment 314216

I almost bought one of this guy's books on Google today. So glad I'd forgotten my password.

 

[Autistic Illuminati]

I almost bought one of this guy's books on Google today.

I signaled you to the FBI a police car is heading your way right now you degenerate

 

[DadaistVizor]

It’s okay to fap to lolis if they’re 1000 year old vampires

 

[Medicated]

Fuck the police.

Let us fap to our petite flat chest bitches!

Well that's the business they are in I guess.

 

[UncleFezziesPantsPuppet]

How bad is loli/shota really?
I myself am quite divided on the topic.

Firstly, I do recognize that any erotic material pertaining to children is bad because it proliferates the fantasies of sexually abusing children, causing pedophiles to be more likely to do it when they lose control.
But I also recognize that a lot of people enjoy loli and shota without being pedo irl nessecarily, so it's also a difficult question of perspective.

The law hasn't really ventured here, and most if not all discussion of the subject is just autistic whining about "it isn't real so it isn't real, i'm not hurting childs (yet)" vs. "bro ur just a pedo u filthy fucking pedos need to be shot".

I'd be interested to know your thoughts, because it keeps me up at night whether I should support the censorship of drawn CP vs. the acceptance of it.

We need a pedophile rating for this sort of thing.

 

[OhGoy]

If we go by Jonathan Ross's logic, it's okay as long as you don't jerk off to it.

 

[Sebben Crudele]

I have always found this discussion pointless.

People will draw whatever the fuck they want. You can't police someone's drawings or writting. They objectively aren't doing anything harmful to anyone, so you are free to point and laugh/cringe/puke, but that's about it.

I don't really give a shit if they jerk it to a piece of paper, personally. Just keep it to yourself. Fap to guro for all I care. Your fetish is not my business as long as you keep it in fiction.

Don't you fucking dare touch a child IRL, though.

 

[ES 148]

TBH hentai in general is a sad waste of life.
I don't know about lolicon being a gateway to RL child abuse, but it's still disgusting in addition to being a sad waste of life.

 

[sideofthematress]

Just a reminder.

 

[Medicated]

Just a reminder.

Is that a SA meme? Looks like it.