Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Why is Lizzy still with Jerry? This post flies in the face of what should be the most important thing in her life. I mean, aren’t most religions tied to life after death? Unless she’s under some misguided belief that this fool can be redeemed/reformed, in which case she’s fighting for a lost cause.

Lizzy falls under a category of what I like to call "Hipster Christians."

They're a type of people that follow all of the hippie *snicker* "love and tolerance" teachings of the bible, specifically new testament, but only specifically to project this misinformed front of being a good person without actually learning the teachings of the Christian bible.

I'm a bit rusty on conveying this information, but this "Love thy Neighbor" aspect of Christianity, while important and becoming a more focal point in modern day teachings and interpretations of the bible, is also being misconstrued into "accept everything." The new testament does indeed make this "be a good person" shtick a prevalent theme, but the way people like Jerry and Lizzy interpret it is in order to justify their flaws and shield themselves from their promiscuity. The bible is mostly about bettering yourself in this regard, learning to shed worldly attachments and rejecting the perceived social corruption of social norms and learn to not live in sin.

tl;dr because I'm not the best equipped to discuss any of this in a high caliber of debate, but Jerry and Lizzy are not abiding by any of the personal convictions, challenges, or teachings that are in the bible, rather they use that as an excuse to make other Christians look bad by saying "See, we're more tolerant than you! Don't you remember how tolerant Jesus was???"

It's a fucking act and an embarrassingly shallow one at that. Note that this isn't me saying certain demographics of people can't be Christians, that's not my point, but many of the churches I've gone to that aren't talking about stoning the gays (not literally) try to teach an acceptance and bettering of ones self through removing sin, not embracing it.

etc etc Unsurprisingly, Lizzy misses the point of what it means to be a Christian and I am willing to put money on Jerry being the reason why because he only surrounds himself with sheep.
 
Lizzy falls under a category of what I like to call "Hipster Christians."

They're a type of people that follow all of the hippie *snicker* "love and tolerance" teachings of the bible, specifically new testament, but only specifically to project this misinformed front of being a good person without actually learning the teachings of the Christian bible.

I'm a bit rusty on conveying this information, but this "Love thy Neighbor" aspect of Christianity, while important and becoming a more focal point in modern day teachings and interpretations of the bible, is also being misconstrued into "accept everything." The new testament does indeed make this "be a good person" shtick a prevalent theme, but the way people like Jerry and Lizzy interpret it is in order to justify their flaws and shield themselves from their promiscuity. The bible is mostly about bettering yourself in this regard, learning to shed worldly attachments and rejecting the perceived social corruption of social norms and learn to not live in sin.

tl;dr because I'm not the best equipped to discuss any of this in a high caliber of debate, but Jerry and Lizzy are not abiding by any of the personal convictions, challenges, or teachings that are in the bible, rather they use that as an excuse to make other Christians look bad by saying "See, we're more tolerant than you! Don't you remember how tolerant Jesus was???"

It's a fucking act and an embarrassingly shallow one at that. Note that this isn't me saying certain demographics of people can't be Christians, that's not my point, but many of the churches I've gone to that aren't talking about stoning the gays (not literally) try to teach an acceptance and bettering of ones self through removing sin, not embracing it.

etc etc Unsurprisingly, Lizzy misses the point of what it means to be a Christian and I am willing to put money on Jerry being the reason why because he only surrounds himself with sheep.
Christianity is really anything but a progressive hippy religion, so I don't get why you see people like Lizzy trying to make it such. The New Testament is often just as scathing and judgmental as the Old Testament.

Matthew 7:6
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

Matthew 7:13
Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat

Matthew 15:26
But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.

Matthew 11:20-24
Then began he to upbraid the cities wherein most of his mighty works were done, because they repented not

Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.

But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you.

And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.

But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.

Matthew 22:14
For many are called, but few are chosen.
Romans 1:26
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature
 
Why is Lizzy still with Jerry? This post flies in the face of what should be the most important thing in her life. I mean, aren’t most religions tied to life after death? Unless she’s under some misguided belief that this fool can be redeemed/reformed, in which case she’s fighting for a lost cause.
Kinda ironic when I think about it. Jerry says that the fact that Josh calls himself a Christian is an insult to Christianity, but, evidently, Lizzy appears to be doing a poor job of following those scriptures, eh?
 
upload_2017-11-30_15-14-47.png

http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/168037091665/what-would-you-consider-to-be-the-worst-superhero
https://archive.is/zOwGQ

So basically, he hates it because it wasn't sunshine and lollipops. I said it before but his obsession with childrens media (and media that's typically lacking of any dark elements in general, with a few notable exceptions) is telling about his personality- either he's an emotional manchild who expects everything to be happy and perfect for him and him alone or he's an autist.
 
View attachment 323846
http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/168037091665/what-would-you-consider-to-be-the-worst-superhero
https://archive.is/zOwGQ

So basically, he hates it because it wasn't sunshine and lollipops. I said it before but his obsession with childrens media (and media that's typically lacking of any dark elements in general, with a few notable exceptions) is telling about his personality- either he's an emotional manchild who expects everything to be happy and perfect for him and him alone or he's an autist.
Superheroes are for kids.

>a brony whining about superheroes being for kids
>Jerry whining about superheroes being for kids
>Jerry thinking he has the first idea of good storytelling because his job is making jokes about kid's shows and writes fanfics with wish-fulfillment self-insert mary-sues and teenage girl orgies

Jerry: "Superheroes are for kids! Stop trying to inject complex ideas in them and make them for adults!"
Also Jerry: "Stop using the tired 'MLP is for kids' argument when people criticize your favorite show, Bronies! It needs those complex political and social ideas in them!"

TDK is pretty overrated though, and too many people oversell it tbh
 

Seems like Jerry can’t stand his autistic fan base, either. Blaming shit on your own fans is usually a good way to get them to ditch you.

View attachment 323846
http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/168037091665/what-would-you-consider-to-be-the-worst-superhero
https://archive.is/zOwGQ

So basically, he hates it because it wasn't sunshine and lollipops. I said it before but his obsession with childrens media (and media that's typically lacking of any dark elements in general, with a few notable exceptions) is telling about his personality- either he's an emotional manchild who expects everything to be happy and perfect for him and him alone or he's an autist.

Sorry for double post, but this is fucking hilarious.

Jerry thinks superheroes shouldn't be taken seriously, while at the same time taking MY LITTLE PONY of all things seriously enough to analyze its themes.

It's strange for an edgelord to be complaining about edge. Is this a whole new level of edgy? Is Jerry cutting his edge on his edge?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
View attachment 323846
http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/168037091665/what-would-you-consider-to-be-the-worst-superhero
https://archive.is/zOwGQ

So basically, he hates it because it wasn't sunshine and lollipops. I said it before but his obsession with childrens media (and media that's typically lacking of any dark elements in general, with a few notable exceptions) is telling about his personality- either he's an emotional manchild who expects everything to be happy and perfect for him and him alone or he's an autist.

Should I name the multiple superheroes that aren't for kids, and how fucking idiotic is to believe that? But besides Jerry suffers the same problem as his idol Bob chipman. They are both manchildren incapable of accepting grey on their pitch perfect vision of superheroes.
 
I think about when Aguilar and his sycophants offer the pitiful excuse “at least he admits to his flaws!” as if that’s supposed to defang criticism. In reality, it validates the criticism because you’ve admitted that another person’s negative perception of you is completely correct.
This explains so much.

SO.
FUCKING.
MUCH.
 
Just a warning, Vidme is going to be shutting down it's services soon according to their Twitter. I don't know how much of Jerry's content got saved on there but just a forewarning before that content is lost.

Where will Metokur be moving his videos he put there?
 
This explains so much.

SO.
FUCKING.
MUCH.
Since I’m bored I feel like it, I kinda want to build off of this. Call it a preemptive response to a future post. *shrug*
I think about when Aguilar and his sycophants offer the pitiful excuse “at least he admits to his flaws!” as if that’s supposed to defang criticism. In reality, it validates the criticism because you’ve admitted that another person’s negative perception of you is completely correct.
I'm not sure if the bit about Anthony's fans using the "excuse" far too often is exaggeration or not, but that's irrelevant.

Someone having a 'negative perception' of you doesn't mean it's an inherently wrong one to have. it only means that they believe that you've done something bad or wrong, and "admitting to your flaws" is a way of acknowledging that there's something wrong with you. Whether or not you want to fix it is up to you. Jerry making this point could, at the very least, be shorthand for Jerry admitting he believes he's absolutely perfect, with all of his wisdom and whatnot, and at most, it could just go on to prove that Jerry's egotistical as fuck. But we already knew that. And before one of his fans who may lurk here comes up with the defense "BUBU LILY HAS CLAIMED THAT GAMERGHAZI IS SMARTER THAN HER" - no. That defense is invalid. The geniuses over at Gamerghazi poked a hole through his "If you don't like getting hit for saying stupid shit, don't say stupid shit logic", and Jerry continued to use it anyways.

It's likely why Jerry's never going to own up to writing lesbian orgies or pedophile fantasies in Stockholm, or sockpuppeting on Derpibooru, or being a terrible person in general. Because then, that would mean that those terrible, transphobic, likely Nazi trolls that have spent so long unjustifiably going after him would actually be right for a change. And admitting so would kill him inside. So I guess we should leave Jerry in his own bubble, where his word is law and he is always right.

I'd also talk about how a government run by Jerry would likely flop and fall on its face, but I'll leave that to someone else (@X-Shaped Weeaboo) to discuss when it's relevant.
 
I'd also talk about how a government run by Jerry would likely flop and fall on its face, but I'll leave that to someone else (@X-Shaped Weeaboo) to discuss when it's relevant.

There's nothing to discuss.

A government has to be run by individuals of influence or by someone who is powerful enough to enforce policies.

Jerry could never be either, but let's assume that he was.

Jerry would then have to make friends with enough of the right people that would willingly work for him/defend him or find it profitable to continue playing nice and considering Jerry's history with "friends", it'd be fucking generous of me to say that he'd "accidentally" catch a bullet on the way home on his first day of power. And, hilariously, it wouldn't be done out of persecution, but because Jerry is a simpleton who they don't see as a threat at all.

But that's just the hypothetical situation that probably would happen. In Jerry's mind, a true ruler would be no less than a physical God that obeyed all of his policies and ideologies. There wouldn't be any sort of compromise or sacrifices that would be tough for him to make, and that's one of the most hilarious things about this political autist.
 
There's nothing to discuss.

A government has to be run by individuals of influence or by someone who is powerful enough to enforce policies.

Jerry could never be either, but let's assume that he was.

Jerry would then have to make friends with enough of the right people that would willingly work for him/defend him or find it profitable to continue playing nice and considering Jerry's history with "friends", it'd be fucking generous of me to say that he'd "accidentally" catch a bullet on the way home on his first day of power. And, hilariously, it wouldn't be done out of persecution, but because Jerry is a simpleton who they don't see as a threat at all.

But that's just the hypothetical situation that probably would happen. In Jerry's mind, a true ruler would be no less than a physical God that obeyed all of his policies and ideologies. There wouldn't be any sort of compromise or sacrifices that would be tough for him to make, and that's one of the most hilarious things about this political autist.
By "when it's relevant", I meant whenever someone asks Jerry how he'd run a country, which (assuming the hypothetical situation where he gets his own country without any strings attached, as is normally the case for hypothetical questions like this) would prompt him to type up a 5 paragraph essay about how everyone who dares follow an ideology that he hates would be swiftly executed without any irony, and by "discuss" I meant show why he's a fucking idiot for wanting such a system.

So... mission accomplished, I guess. lol
 
Back