Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
is it that hard to tell a joke from a death threat nowadays

i would think its a joke but hes been steadily getting more extreme in what he was saying which is probably a bad idea when the isps could just throttle any website that has death threats and were small enough that they could get away with it too.
 
Pajeet did this to force more people to go outside. More people outside = (probably) more people shitting in the streets. He was ridiculed on /pol/ for not going poo in the loo and is out for revenge. It all makes sense. He wants us to feel his pain.

Please don't make me go outside you guys.
 
All this internet nonsense is part of the reason why I’d like to run for president in 2036. A good president listens to the people, and, if Congress were to pass this bill, I’d veto it faster than you can say “Zap to the extreme!”
 
Don't the supporters of NN have more money and influence than those who oppose?
Keep in mind the people in office are old as balls and don't really understand what the Internet is or how it works outside of email and that companies that use it make money somehow. Hence why government-hosted websites tend to look at least a decade out of date.

That and tech companies, being a younger industry, have been bitting heads with politics for a while now. Hell if I recall there was a whole debacle with California needing to overhaul their entire budget because they were banking on being able to tax Facebook.
 
NN was actually put in place thanks to all of the lawsuit s against ISP's when they were at the height of there power and before there enemies had more money. It's shitty that it'll be other megacorporations that will have it reinstated given it's origins. I wonder if Congress will actually use the 60 day review to kill this or if we're back to square one but Google funding the legal fees.
 
Agreed, the only thing stuff like this accomplishes is giving Ajit Pai more ammunition to call us insane lunatics.
At this point who gives a shit, he already won. If he wins his lawsuits then ISPs will be able to get away with pretty much anything.
We should all stand in Pajeet's (designated shitting) driveway and REEEEE constantly as loud as we can.
Seriously I will give my life savings to the first ween who tackles him in public while screaming "JULAAYYYY".
 
Well I sure hope Ajit Pai enjoys whatever his masters over at Verizon are paying him, because now he’s pretty much made himself public enemy #1. I imagine people are gonna try their best his life (as well the lives of his family) as miserable as possible now, up until the end of time. At best, it’ll be intense harassment and trolling campaigns. At worst, someone’s gonna try to kill him. Either way, at the risk of sounding like an A-Log, I find it difficult to have much sympathy towards Pai. He largely brought on himself and his family.
 
Back