Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December

Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
That's only one part of the issue

The other part is that the Obama administration wanted the FCC to be able to regulate the internet as if it was a public utility.

In doing so they would then be able to mandate internet providers provide "free" internet to low income people. Specifically the standard the Obama administration spelled out in a white paper was 100mb down.

Like every other gimme from the Democrats the rest of us responsible adults would be left footing the bill for this "free" service.
 
Last edited:
Corporate lobbying should be illegal.

Or at least limited more than it is.

It's disgusting how influential corporations have become in politics. I'm far from being a Marxist or even a socialist, but you don't have to be either of those things to realize that corporate interference in government is a horrible idea. Politicians are being paid to fuck over the American people and it needs to stop.
 
It's disgusting how influential corporations have become in politics [...]
For example, I think Disney lobbyists were responsible for the extending of the term of copyright protection to the ridiculously long time it is now. Because they didn't want some Mickey Mouse cartoon to become public domain.
 
Last edited:
When something like this gets struck down, you shouldn't be able to reintroduce it for fifteen years.

That seems fair to me. Half a generation. A chance for any given chunk of the population to realize they made a mistake and retry it without having to get beat down trying to stop the same thing over and over and over until finally one time it slimes it's way through.
 
It's disgusting how influential corporations have become in politics. I'm far from being a Marxist or even a socialist, but you don't have to be either of those things to realize that corporate interference in government is a horrible idea. Politicians are being paid to fuck over the American people and it needs to stop.
donald trump is the president. we've already a corporate business man in government
 
Why is this even a thing? It wouldn't help their profits anyways.

It would in the short term, the idea is to throttle websites and make them pay for higher loading speeds and shit on anyone who can't pay their enormous fees. They would also be able to control which websites you're allowed to visit like TV channels and charge the end user premiums just to visit certain websites. It would also enable them to control the political atmosphere of the internet if they were inclined to police wrongthink.
 
Why is this even a thing? It wouldn't help their profits anyways.
Maybe not in the long term, once people catch on to the FCC's bullshit and they start taking it to the streets. But as @MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said, they'd at least have a short term victory until even the average consumer finds out how shitty a policed internet would be like.

There needs to be a law that charges anyone against making up these stupid internet bills and those who support it. This needs to stop, and yet I highly doubt it ever will until someone decides to investigate the FCC itself and begins attacking them publicly (that or Poo-in-the-loo Adjit gets ousted as a pedophile and/or sexual harasser like everyone else in Hollywood these days).
 
Back