Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
I'm sure there is stuff ISPS want that would violate net neutrality, obviously. That doesn't necessarily translate to higher fees or restricted websites, though. There are good reasons for this and I'm glad the FCC did the unpopular, but right thing. Someone has to be a man and stand up against blind silly nerd rage about some ideological "all packets are equal" shit.
Ajit Pai, why are you here?
 
The only way I can compare the net neutrality repeal is to the fucking state of the streaming services in the UK.

There's a reason why people use VPNs to get US netflix, because ours is shit in comparison thanks to sky buying up all the big exclusives, then sticking it behind an extra package.

Just means that any other on-demand service either delay releasing it to their platform or can't release it at all. It also means they can loan these exclusive rights to others and in return, their competitors have to pay a hefty fee back to sky again.
 
If it does go through and certain websites that contain no illegal content are blocked, would it be possible to circumvent that through VPNs or Tor?
Theoretically yes it would be possible. It would also depend on how dedicated ISPs would be to blocking and screwing with VPN connections.
 
Now that I’ve calmed down sufficiently, Rational Darwin is back to help calm my fellow speds.

It looks bad, but don’t think it’s even close to over. You see people on /pol/ and the_donald celebrating this, but it’s very misleading because there are plenty of alt-righters who are just as opposed to this as everyone else (if an alt-right bigwig like Richard Spencer supports net neutrality, that’s got to count for a lot). I think a lot of them are putting on a show for the public because they don’t wanna be seen as “cucks” for siding with the liberals on something, but in private they’re just as prepared to fight for this as everyone else. After all, on the internet no one knows you’re a dog. Who’s to say that the person sending 3 AM pizzas to Pajeet’s house one minute isn’t gonna go online and type “lol fuck net neutrality cry lefties” the next?
 
Potentially this whole mess could be repealed in that time and we'll just be doing this dance again next year.
Net Neutrality ain't free. The tree of internet and memes gotta be litterd with the sweat of Netizens. Ajit Pai aka “Ajit Poo” is not my chairman. he is Corporate tool and probbaly lolcow as well : DD. Equality of CONTENT not monopoly of COMCAST ok. praise Aaron Swartz.
 
we'll just be doing this dance again next year.
There should be a limit and a wait time for stuff like this. We're been doing this for like three or four times now in the past years.
Since a lot of people are very vocal to say "no" everytime it appears, there should be some sort of thing to put a temporary ban to make it unavailable to make a bill for a certain amout of time or something since the results will be the same from the public every time it comes up.
 
uhl1.jpg

uhl2.jpg
 
Back