Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

upload_2017-12-14_23-33-6.png


upload_2017-12-14_23-38-10.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Gorogoroth and AprilRains
Peace and Harmony said:
An unemployed college dropout will solve the problem of poverty in America forever. Yup.

View attachment 334744

Well since you have to pay for Internet now, may as well pay John too, right?

View attachment 334743

Wow, another angry white man lashing out at the decisions made by a person of colour in power. Shameful.

View attachment 334742
Click to expand...


Even if John did get a elected he couldn't do shit about the loss of Net Neutrality. Not a single person in his district even reads his Twitter anyways. The one that did, John blocked when he asked "hard" questions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Herbert Hoover, Count groudon, Water-T and 5 others
Anonymus Fluhre said:
Even if John did get a elected he couldn't do shit about the loss of Net Neutrality. Not a single person in his district even reads his Twitter anyways. The one that did, John blocked when he asked "hard" questions.
Click to expand...

Well, yes and no. I get the sense that Brianna is building a small amount of momentum this week with the made up email from and response to “Jeff Job,” the posts about net neutrality (that’s a big one), and other topics that deal with social issues and only vague technical ones. BitCoin and Moon Rocks make the mask slip and you can see what a fraud she is. Bannon acknowledging GamerGate, however, is like Christmas for the Wus.

We see Brianna’s shoddy facade because we pay attention. We’ve seen the lies from the beginning. But if you’re new to all of this and see her on say TWIT for the first time? You might accept her at face value.

She’s learned things from these interviews. She interrupts less. She understands how to speak to a lay audience. She knows that if she calls herself an engineer or an investigative journalist or a Porsche expert, no one will care to vet her. That’s the job of journalists and they haven’t done it at all.

Her con is working on a growing number of people and we will see this in this week’s donations.

It’s not enough to get her elected but we all know she doesn’t really want the accountability of entering public office. It IS enough to springboard her into her next “career” as, probably, tech and political commentator.

She doesn’t need money because Frank keeps his wallet open to her. She thrives on fame and accolades.

Like with most addictions, her ravenous desire for fame is getting worse. As others have said, if there’s a trending topic online, Brianna will jump in with a hot take that either makes her look like the feminist Godzilla of tech she pretends to be, the hilarious popular kid she always wanted to be, or the crazy person we know she is.

The crazy Tweets reveal her growing support the best. If you read the threads, there’s a growing number of people who insert themselves to defend Brianna from even the most reasonable questions.

Voter: “She blocked me for asking a reasonable question.”
Some rando: “well, were you nice about it?”

TL;DR - Brianna has far more support than most of us can fathom because we know she’s a fraud. Is it enough to get people to do the leg work for her of getting her lazy ass on the ballot while she yells at people online? No but that would be so much fun. She would crumble under the actual scrutiny that would come with a debate with lynch.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: polonium, Count groudon, TheGreatCitracett and 7 others
ZKWNordman said:
Well, yes and no. I get the sense that Brianna is building a small amount of momentum this week with the made up email from and response to “Jeff Job,” the posts about net neutrality (that’s a big one), and other topics that deal with social issues and only vague technical ones. BitCoin and Moon Rocks make the mask slip and you can see what a fraud she is. Bannon acknowledging GamerGate, however, is like Christmas for the Wus.

We see Brianna’s shoddy facade because we pay attention. We’ve seen the lies from the beginning. But if you’re new to all of this and see her on say TWIT for the first time? You might accept her at face value.

She’s learned things from these interviews. She interrupts less. She understands how to speak to a lay audience. She knows that if she calls herself an engineer or an investigative journalist or a Porsche expert, no one will care to vet her. That’s the job of journalists and they haven’t done it at all.

Her con is working on a growing number of people and we will see this in this week’s donations.

It’s not enough to get her elected but we all know she doesn’t really want the accountability of entering public office. It IS enough to springboard her into her next “career” as, probably, tech and political commentator.

She doesn’t need money because Frank keeps his wallet open to her. She thrives on fame and accolades.

Like with most addictions, her ravenous desire for fame is getting worse. As others have said, if there’s a trending topic online, Brianna will jump in with a hot take that either makes her look like the feminist Godzilla of tech she pretends to be, the hilarious popular kid she always wanted to be, or the crazy person we know she is.

The crazy Tweets reveal her growing support the best. If you read the threads, there’s a growing number of people who insert themselves to defend Brianna from even the most reasonable questions.

Voter: “She blocked me for asking a reasonable question.”
Some rando: “well, were you nice about it?”

TL;DR - Brianna has far more support than most of us can fathom because we know she’s a fraud. Is it enough to get people to do the leg work for her of getting her lazy ass on the ballot while she yells at people online? No but that would be so much fun. She would crumble under the actual scrutiny that would come with a debate with lynch.
Click to expand...

Doesn't mean a lot when it's not working on the people in the district John is running for in the end.

When someone is trying to run for my area of the city they don't hold barbecues and campaign across the country. They only focus on their district.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Herbert Hoover, Apteryx Owenii, Count groudon and 11 others
Anonymus Fluhre said:
Doesn't mean a lot when it's not working on the people in the district John is running for in the end.

When someone is trying to run for my area of the city they don't hold barbecues and campaign across the country. They only focus on their district.
Click to expand...

I think Brianna believes that her online fans can somehow reach potential voters for her. You need physical signatures though, right? This might work better if the petition were online but I don’t know enough to know if that’s allowed.
 
ZKWNordman said:
I think Brianna believes that her online fans can somehow reach potential voters for her. You need physical signatures though, right? This might work better if the petition were online but I don’t know enough to know if that’s allowed.
Click to expand...

No. You have to go out in the real world. You have to verify the signatures. You have to verify they're from qualified voters. If you don't scrutinize them, the other guy, who if you're Lynch probably doesn't want to be associated in any way with the feral ghoul, certainly will for you.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Count groudon, AprilRains, Pocket_Sand! and 5 others
Peace and Harmony said:
"Derailed"? You mean the women who became multimillionaires and internationally famous beyond anyone's wildest dreams because they sucked a cock or two?

View attachment 335341
Click to expand...
> Democratic candidate for District 8 (Boston).
> Makes tweets about rich people gotten harassed by even richer people, in Hollywood.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Herbert Hoover, Count groudon, BR55 and 3 others
She isn't building any momentum. Here's her filings:

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00633669/

Last filing they reported about 5k income (brutal for a congressional candidate) and expenditures of about 6k with 4k or so cash on hand.

She got ZERO contributions from any PAC or other non-individual. She has no support of any Democratic leaning orgs. That's...bad.

She should have started her own PAC long ago in order to help the campaign but that would require actual work and expertise.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: BestUserName, Count groudon, vertexwindi and 5 others
thejackal said:
She isn't building any momentum. Here's her filings:

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00633669/

Last filing they reported about 5k income (brutal for a congressional candidate) and expenditures of about 6k with 4k or so cash on hand.

She got ZERO contributions from any PAC or other non-individual. She has no support of any Democratic leaning orgs. That's...bad.

She should have started her own PAC long ago in order to help the campaign but that would require actual work and expertise.
Click to expand...
No PAC would be crazy to hire a batshit insane tranny scammer to ruin their reputation.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Count groudon, AprilRains, Pocket_Sand! and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back