- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
You're kind of thick. There's a difference between what would be obvious when implied to a general public audience (us) and what legally stands up in court. Yes, if he was contracted for sex the contract would be nullified because no contract can be legally valid when it contains clauses which are inherently illegal. However, the contract has no mention of sex. The onus is on Phil to prove to the court that he paid for sex, and was contracted for sex, not for company.Street whores and escorts are looked at the same way here in America. Its sex for money, which is illegal. Signing a NDA for an illegal act would be pointless because you couldn't take anyone to court here in the USA if the contract is broken. Im not saying I have the facts, I'm just asking how would an NDA for an illegal act hold up in court.
But there's a problem with that! You see, if Phil wins his lawsuit, he would have a very Pyrrhic victory, because to nullify his contact means to confess to a crime. Soliciting sex from, not just providing sex as, a sex worker is a crime in Washington State.
This is why Phil gon pay what he owe.