Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then it's probably a combination of the two. He owes back taxes to the state and also decided to spend thousands on a woman he could not afford. He wanted to pay off the government first, but the woman made herself a more imminent issue. If he does pay her expect the begging to be grotesque in January.
He claimed that what he owes in back taxes is "thousands of dollars, maybe not ten thousand, but thousands of dollars." His real tax bill is probably gonna wind up being around two grand, and the rest is to pay for his wintertime blackmail adventure.
 
He claimed that what he owes in back taxes is "thousands of dollars, maybe not ten thousand, but thousands of dollars." His real tax bill is probably gonna wind up being around two grand, and the rest is to pay for his wintertime blackmail adventure.

@MysteryWoman isn't blackmailing him. She's just trying to get paid for doing her job on an amount they both agreed on. On an amount that's less than normal IIRC.

Phil just thought because she was a fan of his she was intrinsically stupid by nature and wouldn't bother trying to get paid if he just pretended he didn't owe anything.
 
I don't usually watch DSP stuff, so when I tuned in to see what he had to say about Kimberlayyyyy I was quite shocked to see him immediately jumping into the game.

He was acting quite strange last night. Usually he can't stfu about anything and constantly looks at stream chat.

The dude can be silent at times but it will usually align with concentration on the game or reading stream chat. He was doing neither and still mostly silent. Looked quite uncomfortable all stream as well.

It is very shocking to see him just blow through prestream. I think a lot of people would agree it's his favorite part of the day.
 
Phil hasn't had a prestream go shorter than 15 minutes in literally I can't remember how long, even for his second stream.

Hell, stream 1 rambling normally goes almost an hour.

Phil's absolute favorite part of streaming is holding court. That he would skip that entirely is unheard of.

Considering the prestream ramble recaps people here are nice enough to make, scrolling back a few pages I can't see any stream recaps being quick. They're almost always meme-worthy in length.
 
I think the leak was only if he didnt get in contact with her so we're shit out of luck till January my man, unless i read wrong and she changed it. (:_(
She will leak it if he suddenly stop contacting her again.

about the tax thing is super weird, as mostly any government loves you paying in tinstalments. As that means they own you and they can add huge cost or obligations if you do not pay them.
So the only reason why he would need to pay that is if he has paid absolutely nothing at all since this summer when these "problems" started.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BrunoMattei
Phil Burnell accepts responsibility for NOTHING. How would he ever get to the point where he became suicidal when he lives in a world where he has done nothing wrong?

And people with his level of narcissism do not commit suicide. They LITERALLY believe that the world could not exist without them. This is why when all the shit rained down on Fred Fuchs, there was never a risk of him hurting himself. People like him and Phil genuinely believe that would deprive the world of their importance.
 
Last edited:
Phil Burnell accepts responsibility for NOTHING. How would he ever get to the point where he became suicidal when he lives in a world where he has done nothing wrong?

And people with his level of narcissism do not commit suicide. They LITERALLY believe that the world could not exist without them. This is why when all the shit rained down on Fred Fuchs, there was never a risk of him hurtng himself. People like him and Phil genuinely believe that would arrive the world of their importance.
I can already see "It's not my fault I couldn't pay! It's because I didn't get enough tips and cheers!", instead of admitting he couldn't afford it.
 
It’s imteresting how this person barely tweeted beforehand (months in between posts) and now posts regularly everyday even though before this whole thing started she last posted in July, she also doesn’t even talk the way she did on the older posts. I mean this could easily be the same situation as Leanna’s twitter with it being inactive and someone taking it over.

Also notice how @MysteryWoman barely answers questions about the holes in her story and when she does it only adds to more problems such as the Christmas photo, so Phil payed this escort earlier in December since she claims not to be the girl in the Christmas tree photo yet her twitter only became active four days ago, which she claimed she bought a bunch of stuff and recently responded to Phil. Also Phil did say that he’s been with his girlfriend three times before and this will be his fourth visit, but this escort is now saying they’ve only met three times. So Phil happened to hang out with the escort and his other girl each three times when he said that? I’d keep going with more holes but we already know you won’t answer.

As for the contract you can easily forge a contract and show it to null, he already said earlier that he can’t confirm it 100% and that it only sounds plausible, yet everyone believes her...
 
20171216_121541.png

When you have some notoriety on the internet and end up pissing off a chick this open, you are in for rough time.
 
It’s imteresting how this person barely tweeted beforehand (months in between posts) and now posts regularly everyday even though before this whole thing started she last posted in July, she also doesn’t even talk the way she did on the older posts. I mean this could easily be the same situation as Leanna’s twitter with it being inactive and someone taking it over.

Also notice how @MysteryWoman barely answers questions about the holes in her story and when she does it only adds to more problems such as the Christmas photo, so Phil payed this escort earlier in December since she claims not to be the girl in the Christmas tree photo yet her twitter only became active four days ago, which she claimed she bought a bunch of stuff and recently responded to Phil. Also Phil did say that he’s been with his girlfriend three times before and this will be his fourth visit, but this escort is now saying they’ve only met three times. So Phil happened to hang out with the escort and his other girl each three times when he said that? I’d keep going with more holes but we already know you won’t answer.

As for the contract you can easily forge a contract and show it to null, he already said earlier that he can’t confirm it 100% and that it only sounds plausible, yet everyone believes her...
but how the she get a copy of phils id?
 
It’s imteresting how this person barely tweeted beforehand (months in between posts) and now posts regularly everyday even though before this whole thing started she last posted in July, she also doesn’t even talk the way she did on the older posts. I mean this could easily be the same situation as Leanna’s twitter with it being inactive and someone taking it over.

Also notice how @MysteryWoman barely answers questions about the holes in her story and when she does it only adds to more problems such as the Christmas photo, so Phil payed this escort earlier in December since she claims not to be the girl in the Christmas tree photo yet her twitter only became active four days ago, which she claimed she bought a bunch of stuff and recently responded to Phil. Also Phil did say that he’s been with his girlfriend three times before and this will be his fourth visit, but this escort is now saying they’ve only met three times. So Phil happened to hang out with the escort and his other girl each three times when he said that? I’d keep going with more holes but we already know you won’t answer.

As for the contract you can easily forge a contract and show it to null, he already said earlier that he can’t confirm it 100% and that it only sounds plausible, yet everyone believes her...

Well, she said she doesn't use her Twitter account all that much normally, and that it doesn't really do much for her professionally. From what she said, she started getting active on it again after she got home and Phil dropped all contact with her, so she used it to stir up shit to get his attention. Also, Leanna's account wasn't inactive and then taken over. She deleted it, and someone else took the name. Not saying that it's completely impossible, though. It'd just be an extremely elaborate hoax, and for what?

She can't confirm or deny whether she's the person in the photo (or give any other concrete evidence), for reasons that should be obvious. I can't be bothered to go back to check, but I'm fairly sure Phil said this would've been the third visit. Although he's, uh, hardly an oracle of truth on the matter.

I still think it's way too good to be true. But, at least, like others have mentioned before, it doesn't really make sense for an (apparently) accomplished high class escort to potentially destroy her credibility and tank her career, just to troll Phil and/or us.

Whether or not it's true, though, it's the most entertaining thing to have happened here in months.
 
Last edited:
It’s imteresting how this person barely tweeted beforehand (months in between posts) and now posts regularly everyday even though before this whole thing started she last posted in July, she also doesn’t even talk the way she did on the older posts. I mean this could easily be the same situation as Leanna’s twitter with it being inactive and someone taking it over.

Also notice how @MysteryWoman barely answers questions about the holes in her story and when she does it only adds to more problems such as the Christmas photo, so Phil payed this escort earlier in December since she claims not to be the girl in the Christmas tree photo yet her twitter only became active four days ago, which she claimed she bought a bunch of stuff and recently responded to Phil. Also Phil did say that he’s been with his girlfriend three times before and this will be his fourth visit, but this escort is now saying they’ve only met three times. So Phil happened to hang out with the escort and his other girl each three times when he said that? I’d keep going with more holes but we already know you won’t answer.

As for the contract you can easily forge a contract and show it to null, he already said earlier that he can’t confirm it 100% and that it only sounds plausible, yet everyone believes her...
True, but then again you have phil's own reaction to somewhat confirm all of this, if it's true of course. Not everybody one here is believing her to the last letter of each word. AS people said before, if it's all real than this shows how low dsp would go and if it's not, than we all got trolled. I see some people are somewhat ignoring phil's own reactions last night and won't even try to address it as what it may be, a coincidence.
 
Phil's behaviour last night was abnormal. Does not prove anything but certainly adds to the suspicions. We all know Phil will end up paying though (if indeed true) which means there'll be no escort revenge revelation. Phil's fans always deliver the money he needs when he cries about it, whether from patreon or twitch.
 
It’s imteresting how this person barely tweeted beforehand (months in between posts) and now posts regularly everyday even though before this whole thing started she last posted in July, she also doesn’t even talk the way she did on the older posts. I mean this could easily be the same situation as Leanna’s twitter with it being inactive and someone taking it over.

Also notice how @MysteryWoman barely answers questions about the holes in her story and when she does it only adds to more problems such as the Christmas photo, so Phil payed this escort earlier in December since she claims not to be the girl in the Christmas tree photo yet her twitter only became active four days ago, which she claimed she bought a bunch of stuff and recently responded to Phil. Also Phil did say that he’s been with his girlfriend three times before and this will be his fourth visit, but this escort is now saying they’ve only met three times. So Phil happened to hang out with the escort and his other girl each three times when he said that? I’d keep going with more holes but we already know you won’t answer.

As for the contract you can easily forge a contract and show it to null, he already said earlier that he can’t confirm it 100% and that it only sounds plausible, yet everyone believes her...

The contract has phil's ID on it, so if we're led on a hype train it's because the possible validity of it was overblown by those who verified identity. I say this because they've verified WHO she is, and the contract. So at this point as long as that much is true there's no room for the guessing otherwise.

Also about the twitter if she deleted her twitter and someone remade with the same handle it wouldn't retain all the old tweets. I'm not sure how when typing that didn't occur to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mach and xAnonAnonX
Also about the twitter if she deleted her twitter and someone remade with the same handle it wouldn't retain all the old tweets. I'm not sure how when typing that didn't occur to you.

herp a derp because I like my cookie manie theories better.
There is plenty of evidence that she is the same person. There is also plenty of evidence that she is the "dutch" (please stop calling her danish, different country and language) escort. Not only from her twitter, but also her escort site being changed to be more up to date with things.
 
It’s imteresting how this person barely tweeted beforehand (months in between posts) and now posts regularly everyday even though before this whole thing started she last posted in July, she also doesn’t even talk the way she did on the older posts. I mean this could easily be the same situation as Leanna’s twitter with it being inactive and someone taking it over.

Also notice how @MysteryWoman barely answers questions about the holes in her story and when she does it only adds to more problems such as the Christmas photo, so Phil payed this escort earlier in December since she claims not to be the girl in the Christmas tree photo yet her twitter only became active four days ago, which she claimed she bought a bunch of stuff and recently responded to Phil. Also Phil did say that he’s been with his girlfriend three times before and this will be his fourth visit, but this escort is now saying they’ve only met three times. So Phil happened to hang out with the escort and his other girl each three times when he said that? I’d keep going with more holes but we already know you won’t answer.

As for the contract you can easily forge a contract and show it to null, he already said earlier that he can’t confirm it 100% and that it only sounds plausible, yet everyone believes her...

Very valid points some of which can be explained and some which can't readily be explained.

Here's a question for people upset about the current level of proof (which I do understand and appreciate, the criticisms of it are perfectly valid).

Assuming someone was an actual escort, how could they prove that? Besides having online profiles etc, how would someone actually go out of their way to prove that?

Is that an easy question to answer? I really have to impress upon people how specific/unique of a situation this is, which is quite difficult to do.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mach and Pursona14
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back