Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[theriddler3]

If he's consistent with misusing the law in the way he's demonstrated, he probably wants the judge to compel specific performance- basically, making one party do something instead of a monetary award. Generally, it's only done if there is no practical substitution for the original goods or services.

Take this fictional example:

Let's say I want my kitchen tiled, so I hire Giuseppe. He's the best tile installer in the region, and he is the sole supplier of a certain tile from Italy I want. He wants to be paid half upfront, and I like his work, so I oblige.

His work is good, but it's taking forever. His helper called in sick, the tiles got held up in customs, excuse after excuse. By now, I'm frustrated- this job was supposed to take 3 weeks and it's taken 8. Giuseppe says he can't finish the job, which has nothing to do, he swears, with a new luxury subdivision nearing completion, so he offers me a partial refund.

However, I don't want my money back- my kitchen is half finished, and I can't even finish it with the tiles I want because Giuseppe is the only local supplier. I lawyer up and take him to court, and sue for specific performance- I want him to finish the job as agreed upon. The judge presiding over the matter of Dangerhair v. Giuseppe agrees that there is no practical substitution for his work, and just getting my money back would leave me less than whole- no kitchen and not the kitchen I want after, so he orders Giuseppe to finish the work within x days.

Basically, Russ thinks that a judge would force the girl to go on a date with him if she accepts the Venmo dollar instead of making her give it back.

I think you're overthinking Russ' intentions with the venmo dollar, but that was very informative and interesting.

Russ cannot grasp jurisdiction, so it's seriously doubtful he can understand anything even slightly more complex than jurisdiction. IMO, I think he thinks the dollar makes it look like he has disposable income he can throw at women. I really don't think he's thought any further than "female=likes shopping, likes shopping=needs money, needs money-> send her a dollar to prove I have some money -> sex". He's like a dog chasing a car; he has no idea what he'd do with it if he ever got what he wanted. Whoever said a single dollar makes Russ feel like a baller was spot on (again, IMO). And we all know Russ doesn't need a basis to sue upon. He tried to sue Farrah Abrham for liking his tweet, then never acknowledging him again other than hiring a lawyer to defend herself.

 

[xyrichard]

Is it actually a dollar in America by some statute or something? Here (like most common law jurisdictions I imagine) we still go by the rhetorical "peppercorn". Nonetheless, I'm amazed I didn't think of the idea myself that he's trying to force some sort of legal relationship on his victims.

 

[gREEEEEEEEEr]

I seriously doubt that Russ has a lawsuit all planned out with his $1 "gifts". Aside from the fact that I don't think he can plan anything that far in advance (his lawsuits always occur after his narcissistic side has had a while to regurgitate the facts and rewrite them so that he was faulted and discriminated against), he has on multiple occasions sent gift cards and money to Instagram prostitutes -- uh, models -- and it hasn't gotten him a single date yet. If creating a contractual agreement which would form the legal basis for a suit was his whole agenda all along, he'd at least threaten to sue them when the desired result failed to materialize. Although he's chimped out in comments after this has happened, he hasn't sued them... as far as I can remember, he hasn't even threatened it.

edit: spelling

 

[SilverSteele]

Another rage quit! I wonder if Kayli got to him lol

 

[Dangerhair]

I seriously doubt that Russ has a lawsuit all planned out with his $1 "gifts". Aside from the fact that I don't think he can plan anything that far in advance (his lawsuits always occur after his narcissistic side has had a while to regurgitate the facts and rewrite them so that he was faulted and discriminated against), he has on multiple occasions sent gift cards and money to Instagram prostitutes -- uh, models -- and it hasn't gotten him a single date yet. If creating a contractual agreement which would form the legal basis for a suit was his whole agenda all along, he'd at least threaten to sue them when the desired result failed to materialize. Although he's chimped out in comments after this has happened, he hasn't sued them... as far as I can remember, he hasn't even threatened it.

edit: spelling

Well, they would have to accept for that to work. ...oh God,

I have gazed into the abyss that is Russ' maw for too long and have began to out-Russ Russ. I should probably see the doctor about the loss of sensation in my lower lip.

 

[Viridian]

I think you're overthinking Russ' intentions with the venmo dollar, but that was very informative and interesting.

Russ cannot grasp jurisdiction, so it's seriously doubtful he can understand anything even slightly more complex than jurisdiction. IMO, I think he thinks the dollar makes it look like he has disposable income he can throw at women. I really don't think he's thought any further than "female=likes shopping, likes shopping=needs money, needs money-> send her a dollar to prove I have some money -> sex". He's like a dog chasing a car; he has no idea what he'd do with it if he ever got what he wanted. Whoever said a single dollar makes Russ feel like a baller was spot on (again, IMO). And we all know Russ doesn't need a basis to sue upon. He tried to sue Farrah Abrham for liking his tweet, then never acknowledging him again other than hiring a lawyer to defend herself.

I personally suspect he just wants to give them money so he has something (however pitiful) to try to hold over their head and guilt them about if they reject his advances. "I gave you money and now you're discriminating against me! How dare you?! REEEEEEEE!!"

 

[gREEEEEEEEEr]

He is a total narcissist. That's why his gifts are so pathetic, half-assed, and lame. It's not how expensive or fancy his $1 Venmos, or Starbucks cards, or that awful smelly suit, or the cheap flowers are; those are all just a way for him to get his foot in the door, so to speak. He completely believes that, once he's given a fair shot, he'll succeed in "wooing" them on his charm and good looks. When he falls flat on his flat face, it comes as a severe blow to his self-esteem... so he inevitably rewrites their rejection as them discriminating against him. What other reason could they possibly have to spurn him? Obviously they're just "bias" against his ugly face. It couldn't possibly be that they see something ugly underneath it; that would simply be inconceivable.

 

[The Dude]

View attachment 336005
View attachment 336007
View attachment 336042
View attachment 336049

Literally none of that applies to Russhole. He's got this unwarranted grandiose view of himself, like he's on the same level as Jobs, Gates, or anyone else who actually has made a difference in the world. He's unwilling to accept the reality of him being a worthless nobody with an extreme entitlement complex. He can barely change his own clothes, let alone change the world.

 

[Russpoleon Greeramite]

C’mon Rusty, it shouldn’t take more than a quick glance at a name tag to “learn” someone’s name. Anything more than half a second then all you are doing is staring at her chest.

 

[DuckSucker]

Does anybody call a person by their name when theyre just talking to an employee anyway? Like unless they introduce themselves to you or youre having a more prolonged or a more involved interaction with them, I always thought it was considered kind of rude? Like you would say "sir" or "maam", but why do you need to know the name of your barista? Why are you even looking to learn her name unless in your case youre planning on stalking her or some shit.

 

[SpaceAce]

I love the Russ logic that it's only okay for a woman to be a "hoe" when it benefits him.
That is a picture perfect view of his narcissism. It's not about her rights, her body or her profession. None of that matters if it's only benefiting her and she's using these rights to sleep with other guys.
Legally, the only way woman should be able to have sex, in Russ's twisted brain, is if they HAVE to have sex with him.

 

[Lunachu]

When the judge doesn't legalize prostitution for him he will probably start campaigning against abortion out of bitterness. Because if he isn't allowed what HE wants then why should they get to have what THEY want, REEEEE! That will teach all those hoes not to sleep with him.

 

[The_Truth]

Does anybody call a person by their name when theyre just talking to an employee anyway? Like unless they introduce themselves to you or youre having a more prolonged or a more involved interaction with them, I always thought it was considered kind of rude? Like you would say "sir" or "maam", but why do you need to know the name of your barista? Why are you even looking to learn her name unless in your case youre planning on stalking her or some shit.

He's probably trying to stalk her later on facebook

 

[Rabbit Bones]

I'm fucking dying. That drawing is amazing.

 

[The Great Citracett]

I'm fucking dying. That drawing is amazing.

@This Fucking Guy senpai has noticed you!

Also, anyone notice he erased the one post calling Kayli mean about the hoe thing, but kept all the rest of the conversation and didn't block her?

 

[SwiftlyRuiningRussell]

Grab your popcorn and settle in on this fine Saturday. Wait until he gets to the Taylor Olivia & @NipplelessWoman parts. Shit's going down. Guys, he means it this time.

 

[Smarmy]

Does anybody call a person by their name when theyre just talking to an employee anyway? Like unless they introduce themselves to you or youre having a more prolonged or a more involved interaction with them, I always thought it was considered kind of rude? Like you would say "sir" or "maam", but why do you need to know the name of your barista? Why are you even looking to learn her name unless in your case youre planning on stalking her or some shit.

The only time I can think of where you'd probably call an employee by name is if you're dealing with some sort of commission sale. Those take much longer than buying hot chocolate, and involve way more conversation and deal-making. At that point, it just makes the entire transaction easier, especially if it's one of those sales that take a few visits. He just wanted to stare at some tiddlyums.

 

[GloriousScarf]

Grab your popcorn and settle in on this fine Saturday. Wait until he gets to the Taylor Olivia & @NipplelessWoman parts. Shit's going down. Guys, he means it time.

View attachment 336250

Glad he finally caught up on the thread. Nice to see fuckhead dragging up Bailee again, full of class this guy.

 

[RebatsivePulsard]

Grab your popcorn and settle in on this fine Saturday. Wait until he gets to the Taylor Olivia & @NipplelessWoman parts. Shit's going down. Guys, he means it time.

View attachment 336250

Kiwi meetup at the trial, guys! Or should I call it Law 101 class, since he’ll fuck it up and get a lesson on law basics from the judge?

 

[Rayleigh]

Grab your popcorn and settle in on this fine Saturday. Wait until he gets to the Taylor Olivia & @NipplelessWoman parts. Shit's going down. Guys, he means it time.

View attachment 336250

Russell could give the legal section of this site a read-over:

• I am an insane person on the Internet with no assets. There is nothing you can take from me.

But adding fuel to the fire is what we do here and I have a free evening. Consider the Lolcow Wiki page for Russell underway.