Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

Status
Not open for further replies.
To add to this.


IF DSP does not pay @MysteryWoman and she decided to share everything to us and make a twitch account and share her story on Twitch's platform and make a good case of DSP using twitch to pay for hookers after claiming it's for "taxes" and him specifically we people to donate to his PayPal and Patreon over Twitch's services(subscription or cheers) could get him a suspension under investigation most likely. She could literally break him depending on what she has and what he omitted to her on recordinh or in logs etc
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: usernames_suck and DarkSoulsPhil
Hi, one quick question for @MysteryWoman, just a quick yes/no. This woof woof porn, without going into details, is it legal but potentially embarrassing (by legal I mean features humans of legal age), or something else?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
Reactions: Bryan Dunn
MysteryWoman said:
Oh hell no not gonna see him again ever, only reason to gothere again would be together with my husband and his buddies to collect my cash and that would be it.

O yeah and i didnt answer but yes he has fetishes, watching some woof woof porn is one of em which i mentioned before.

As for the video, some clients pay extra to make a video of their sex acts with an escort for which they have to pay extra and sign a mutual NDA that it will be for private use only, both client and escort receive a copy now in this case if he breaches the contract he also breaches the NDA of the video. Not going into details as to whats on it or what we do in it but yes we are both visually and with sound in the video. Thats all im saying for now, offcourse if he pays in time maybe one day accidently my phone will be hacked and the person leaks it, seen it happen so much the past years im afraid it could happen to me but i always try to protect my phone against it so lets hope my phone security is strong.
Click to expand...
what do you mean by woof woof porn? beastiality? sex with dogs?
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: OutspokenHuman, Stay safe and MysteryWoman
@MysteryWoman I have no doubt he will cough up the money and pay you. We gonna miss the juice details which is sad but I think the paying part is more important.

Maybe when he pays the 3000dollars, you could make a blurry phoneshot of the ammount of number. No other detail, no other info just that there was a transfer of X ammount... and show it to Null. Its not like people transfering that money left and right casually... it would not reveal any new info, but it would be a stronger evidence of this is real.
 
xenomorph said:
What if Phil leaks it to go viral in some nasty attempt at gaining more viewership, he has done it in the past with his fap incident, who is to say it wouldnt happen? Meaning he would just claim his info was hacked by them dirty detractors and violated his privacy with his "gf"
Click to expand...
It's still a breach of the NDA. If he does this, and claims that it's stolen, and it's his girlfriend, dood!... Then the other party could release whatever she wants to. I would imagine that little clause would extend well beyond payment, so supposing Phil pays what he owes, and then later on is "hacked" and the video is "leaked," he violates their terms and then it's back on like Donkey Kong.
 
Beowulf said:
Hi, one quick question for @MysteryWoman, just a quick yes/no. This woof woof porn, without going into details, is it legal but potentially embarrassing (by legal I mean features humans of legal age), or something else?
Click to expand...

No as far as i know its illegal in the US to have or own this kinda porn that he watches, im sure you know with this what kinda woof woof porn im talking about also no i didnt do these kinda acts for him, what i have on video has nothing to do with the woof woof. What i do have does involve sexual material just not the woof woof kind.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: mach, Clown Doll, CartmanKusanagi and 5 others
MysteryWoman said:
No as far as i know its illegal in the US to have or own this kinda porn that he watches, im sure you know with this what kinda woof woof porn im talking about also no i didnt do these kinda acts for him, what i have on video has nothing to do with the woof woof. What i do have does involve sexual material just not the woof woof kind.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, I really am, but you're making me hope you don't get paid.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Mankirk, usernames_suck, Fox and 7 others
MysteryWoman said:
No as far as i know its illegal in the US to have or own this kinda porn that he watches, im sure you know with this what kinda woof woof porn im talking about also no i didnt do these kinda acts for him, what i have on video has nothing to do with the woof woof. What i do have does involve sexual material just not the woof woof kind.
Click to expand...

>We live in a day and age where a possible Beastiality porn video featuring Phil Burnell exists

I. WANT. TO. BELIEVE.
:story::story::story:
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Rokko, OutspokenHuman, DarkSoulsPhil and 4 others
MysteryWoman said:
No as far as i know its illegal in the US to have or own this kinda porn that he watches, im sure you know with this what kinda woof woof porn im talking about also no i didnt do these kinda acts for him, what i have on video has nothing to do with the woof woof. What i do have does involve sexual material just not the woof woof kind.
Click to expand...
No dragon dildo then?

A shame, they're Making fantasies real™ since 2008.
Bad dragon.JPG
 
MysteryWoman said:
O yeah and i didnt answer but yes he has fetishes, watching some woof woof porn is one of em which i mentioned before.
Click to expand...

Oh dear. Now I don't want to see anything related to this anymore.

FedoraManManMan said:
>We live in a day and age where a possible Beastiality porn video featuring Phil Burnell exists
Click to expand...

That's horrifying.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: OutspokenHuman, HansGruber, Bryan Dunn and 1 other person
MysteryWoman said:
Oh hell no not gonna see him again ever, only reason to gothere again would be together with my husband and his buddies to collect my cash and that would be it.

O yeah and i didnt answer but yes he has fetishes, watching some woof woof porn is one of em which i mentioned before.

As for the video, some clients pay extra to make a video of their sex acts with an escort for which they have to pay extra and sign a mutual NDA that it will be for private use only, both client and escort receive a copy now in this case if he breaches the contract he also breaches the NDA of the video. Not going into details as to whats on it or what we do in it but yes we are both visually and with sound in the video. Thats all im saying for now, offcourse if he pays in time maybe one day accidently my phone will be hacked and the person leaks it, seen it happen so much the past years im afraid it could happen to me but i always try to protect my phone against it so lets hope my phone security is strong.
Click to expand...
I really hope your "leak" statement is a subtle hint that someone whose name rhymes with Emberly Link will release it......
 
Schmeckel said:
It's still a breach of the NDA. If he does this, and claims that it's stolen, and it's his girlfriend, dood!... Then the other party could release whatever she wants to. I would imagine that little clause would extend well beyond payment, so supposing Phil pays what he owes, and then later on is "hacked" and the video is "leaked," he violates their terms and then it's back on like Donkey Kong.
Click to expand...

The "NDA" is utterly fictional and even if it did exist, it is worth as much as if I got you to sign a piece of paper saying that you were from the planet Neptune.

@MysteryWoman either made that detail up or got DSP to sign a piece of paperwork with no legal bearing. I've definitely seem escorts run more complex scams, but admitting it on a message board would simply be trolling yourself.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: mach, TwinkleSnort, Pursona14 and 9 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back