- Joined
- Oct 31, 2017
I'm slowly starting to understand how Phil operates. Everything is grey middle area until evidence surfaces, then it is all black or white. Case in point; "They think I am not raising for my taxes and just using it to pay off of some escort". We know Phil has taxes to pay, every one does, but because that is a fact - to him, the escort issue MUST be false. All that money if for taxes dood. Not that it can be for both. It MUST be for the taxes OR for an escort. It is how he escapes accountability through semantics and logical fallacy. It can't be B if A is already established.
I prefer hard proof as I think most every one here does. But there is no denying that when Phil in his prestream went to swing for the fences with, "come on guys there are way more important things in the world to deal with than this" it to me was a shrilling red beacon of bullshit.
I prefer hard proof as I think most every one here does. But there is no denying that when Phil in his prestream went to swing for the fences with, "come on guys there are way more important things in the world to deal with than this" it to me was a shrilling red beacon of bullshit.