Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

Status
Not open for further replies.
MysteryWoman said:
Not just that either, we are talking about a streamer on twitch i never even heard of with barely 200 viewers with viewers mixed from Phill Fans and God knows who else. So there was no point in even doing anything there. I just wanted to see what it was all about, all it was when i was there was a discussion about Vidar his small single person bed that made no fucking sense at all.
Click to expand...
TXT was the guy that got Pascal from the SoK's panties in a twist over a fucking emote on twitch that later led to a bunch of leaks from the SoK by JoRo and sirjamesdtech (among others)

There is an entire thread about it here:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/fred-fuchs-freddy-boy.33971/
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/fred-fuchs-freddy-boy.33971/
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/fred-fuchs-freddy-boy.33971/
Also I think part of the reason people can't wrap their heads around the concept of an NDA is because they've never seen one and can't use google so I'll leave this example NDA here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...2/Example-Mutual-Non-Disclosure-Agreement.pdf
 
Yellow Yam Scam said:
Her goal is to give her story credibility to pressure Phil (or maybe "ruin" him, I guess), in my summation. By having a chance to prove who she is to Phil's fans she gives herself credibility. She turned that chance down and now Phil's fans will further doubt her, reducing pressure. That's how I would see it if I were in her shoes.
Click to expand...

So she goes on the podcast and repeats everything she is allegedly allowed to say. That increases her credibility like what. . .1%. Because at least now you know she's not a dude or Chinese AI? From a cursory read of this thread you know her name, her profession, her employer and other small details. Beyond breaking this supposed NDA (which if it does exist is not something to screw with) what exactly does she say that somehow shifts the narrative for those who have doubted her story?
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: wohzi, GnomeofDoc and carolburnett
I think we forget how far into all of this we are. I am going out on a limb here that MW has not been so balls deep on the Phil (No not that way you filthy animals) stuff compared to the average Kiwi Fag. So I am just saying that anything can happen and just chill out till we get something. I was really adamant on proof at first but we got what we got and I am content on just waiting till she wants to give more.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaDood and AnonAutismo
speaking for myself; i was definitely pushing the envelope with MW. I realize now that harassing someone is not the right way to go about this. Lets sit back and watch the play unfold. Phil has enough rope and in due time will kick the chair over himself.
 
There appears to be some grand plans in operation so while waiting for all that to come to fruition, all that can really be done is just to wait and see. Just enjoy Phil bumbling his way through mgs or something.

I'm personally treating this whole thing like a pint of Guinness - good things come to those who wait. Hopefully it's worth waiting for. Also I'm drinking Guinness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stay safe, Crow, GnomeofDoc and 1 other person
ANDS! said:
So she goes on the podcast and repeats everything she is allegedly allowed to say. That increases her credibility like what. . .1%. Because at least now you know she's not a dude or Chinese AI? From a cursory read of this thread you know her name, her profession, her employer and other small details. Beyond breaking this supposed NDA (which if it does exist is not something to screw with) what exactly does she say that somehow shifts the narrative for those who have doubted her story?
Click to expand...

They do not believe that she is who she says she is. They think its a Twitter account or the woman's husband or all manner of other silliness, so yes, it would lend some credibility if she proved she was a woman. This all seems to be a game of perception and she could have won it but she chose not to. Maybe a valid decision depending on what else she's got up her sleeves.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyber Bowling
This is turning into two circle jerk groups. MW story has always been and will be taken as what it is, a troll attempt until proven otherwise. Second, just because some specific members on here were present and participated during the sok collapse doesn't mean you're hot shit or the voice of reason. Don't let your ego go from your ass to your head. Chill out, and watch the antics of dsp from the comfort of the farms
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Unga Wunga, PoopMagnet, Fox and 11 others
AmericFront said:
This is turning into two circle jerk groups. MW story has always been and will be taken as what it is, a troll attempt until proven otherwise. Second, just because some specific members on here were present and participated during the sok collapse doesn't mean you're hot shit. Don't let your ego go from your ass to your head, especially with a giant like kiwifarms. Chill out, and watch the dsp, bsv, and his band of fellow autists dig their grave deeper
Click to expand...

This, seriously. How many times does it need repeating that we all need to just calm the fuck down and wait and see what happens?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Funkedinthetrunk
AmericFront said:
This is turning into two circle jerk groups. MW story has always been and will be taken as what it is, a troll attempt until proven otherwise. Second, just because some specific members on here were present and participated during the sok collapse doesn't mean you're hot shit. Don't let your ego go from your ass to your head, especially with a giant like kiwifarms. Chill out, and watch the dsp, bsv, and his band of fellow autists screw themselves over day in day out.
Click to expand...
lol. Calm down.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AmericFront
Holy shit.

Why is everyone on a fucking crusade to prove if this shit is instantly real or not? The information will or will not get revealed in due time.

And for the record, I get why people might not trust @MysteryWoman but I am a bit surprised you guys wouldn't trust @Null even after there was some type of verification process.

In the immortal words of fellow kiwi's
"Lol calm down"
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: AssDust, NumberingYourState, BLACKPINKPRO and 1 other person
Ninjaman123 said:
honestly ive looked at the avi of MW and the one phil posted on ig and im not so sure if she even has the same hair color. MW clearly put like a filter on the pic so its hard to tell but her hair looks dark blonde to me instead of red. might just be me
Click to expand...
The hair thing bugs me too. It looks to be a blonder red + filter, whereas the christmas pic is clearly a deep dyed red. However, red hair dye tends to fade super fast depending on what product you use to dye it, the type of product used after to keep the dye in, and how often/soon you wash your after after dying it. And actually for blondes it is harder to dye to red than say a brunette. So it's another one of those doesn't prove it, but doesn't disprove the story for me pieces.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: xAnonAnonX and PrincessHomura
Yellow Yam Scam said:
They do not believe that she is who she says she is. They think its a Twitter account or the woman's husband or all manner of other silliness, so yes, it would lend some credibility if she proved she was a woman. This all seems to be a game of perception and she could have won it but she chose not to. Maybe a valid decision depending on what else she's got up her sleeves.
Click to expand...

. ..however she has offered to have the other party call her. So how does that square with the above? If this person had offered to have this "Vidar" call her AFTER he prompts her to join this skeevy podcast you might have a point. People who are trying to hide their gender don't tend to do bluffs that are so easily called as that, which she did, before Vidar "outfoxed" her (which he didn't, hence the square-quotes).

I'm not suggesting this proves their story, simply that your insistence that it discredits anything is wrong. Like I said, she goes on and proves her gender. . .and? You're telling me folks wouldn't just move on to the next thing. "Oh ok, well now why don't you give us details!" You know that's exactly what would happen so why pretend that her not making some shotgun acquiescence somehow changes anything.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fernando Vidal and MysteryWoman
neger psykolog said:
Unfortunately, that's just people's autism at work.

And yeah, I can see where you're coming from and I've made efforts to try and moderate the discussion a bit however the discussion has pretty much blown up with people that don't read anything. If I delete anything I'm accused of pandering or censorship and if I leave it up then people complain all the same.

I know people won't read this at all, but its not a requirement for you to believe anything, you can say what you think and that's fine but the whole demanding your steak medium-well because you think people care about things the same way you do is exceptional. This has been a "Take it as it is" story with an attached deadline since day 1.
Click to expand...

In my humble opinion, please delete without comment:

1. Posts with questions that already have been answered
2. Thirstposts

We have the following thread where you can spill your thoughts why @MysteryWoman´s story might be fake:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/designated-whiner-shitting-street.37975/

@neger psykolog you´re doing a good job, and if people really accuse you of what you said, fuck it.

Sorry if this is backseat moderating, but this is a great thread. Lets just wait until the deadline for phil to pay, then we can unleash the autism, please.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: RandomAccount, neger psykolog, Fox and 8 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back