Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

[SilkyEnigma]

Explain this @ANDS! & @neger psykolog

If that's her in the picture. Why does she admit here that Phil's girlfriend came before her, decorated the tree, and Phil takes a photo of it all? Right here she admits that. She even admits to only decorating his mancave. Not to mention she been said that wasn't her in a picture. So I don't understand how this "hair color" photo is any breaking news to anyone. Stop being naive and gullible, I know you guys wish this was all true, I WISHED IT WAS ALL TRUE, but it isn't.

 

[neger psykolog]

Explain this @ANDS! & @neger psykolog

View attachment 352402

If that's her in the picture. Why does she admit here that Phil's girlfriend came before her, decorated the tree, and Phil takes a photo of it all? Right here she admits that. She even admits to only decorating his mancave. Not to mention she been said that that wasn't her in a picture. SO I don't understand how this "hair color" photo is any breaking news to anyone. Stop being naive and gullible, I know you guys wish this was all true, I WISHED IT WAS ALL TRUE, but it isn't.

Then wait until his "actual true girlfriend" arrives in February?

 

[Tetra]

Shame he paid up. Oh well.

 

[Mister Peeps]

Why is this so important for people to go on and on and on for several posts trying to disprove shit?

It's an entertaining story, nothing more. Phil is not some public high profile figure where we must know the truth!

Some people believe it, some do not.

We all have our own thoughts which we've shared.

Let it play out and enjoy the ride. No need to go on rants for pages of this thread being condescending because someone doesn't agree with you.

Jeez.

 

[ANDS!]

Explain this @ANDS! & @neger psykolog

View attachment 352402

If that's her in the picture. Why does she admit here that Phil's girlfriend came before her, decorated the tree, and Phil takes a photo of it all? Right here she admits that. She even admits to only decorating his mancave. Not to mention she been said that wasn't her in a picture. So I don't understand how this "hair color" photo is any breaking news to anyone. Stop being naive and gullible, I know you guys wish this was all true, I WISHED IT WAS ALL TRUE, but it isn't.

She doesn't actually admit to anything. At BEST she agrees to a timeline that would make sense; she has been, to the frustration of others, incredibly cagey on the similarities between those two photos and confirming whether they are both her. And the person she is quoting says they decorated his" 'office' among other things," a tree for example.

. . .and not for nothing but I don't really care if the story is true, I'm mostly interested in pointing out why people who say it isn't true aren't actually arguing good points. I'm far more interested in his tax "fraud" and the escort story gave some possible insight on to why his story in regards to that didn't make sense.

 

[harbinger]

Why is this so important for people to go on and on and on for several posts trying to disprove shit?

autism

 

[BlackBerserker1]

I'm mostly interested in pointing out why people who say it isn't true aren't actually arguing good points.

Oh god. She literally said everything alluding to her being the girl in the picture, and when asked to flat out reply if its her she cited the NDA. I.E. it is her but she cant say. If it wasnt her she could just say it wasnt her. But she didnt. She used NDA multiple times which meant she was saying she WAS the girl in the pictures according to the language used. But then she 180 and said it wasnt her and all of a sudden we get an image from a girl who wants to remain anonymous but is happy to have a picture of her on the internet, name and a rough idea of her living situation. And now thats apparently tree girl according to MW. Then oh wait, 180 again here is a picture to show it WAS me!

Its either bullshit or its true and MW is a compulsive liar whoes story is true but they cant help themselves from embellishing.

 

[HansGruber]

MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"
KIWI: "So didja fuck em?!"
MW: "Yes"
KIWI: "Is your name Kim from this website?"
MW: "Yes. Here is my twitter"
KIWI: "Is this you in this picture at Phil's?"
MW: "Maybe, dunno."
KIWI: "Prove it!"
MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"
KIWI: "Well then how do we know he owes you money?"
MW: "Because I came on here to rattle his cage"
KIWI: "Well what if he doesn't pay?!"
MW: "I'll ruin him with damning evidence"
KIWI: "Like what?!!"
MW: "Videos, photos, etc."
KIWI: "Can we see them?!"
MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"
KIWI: "What if he does pay?"
MW: "Then my story here ends but there might be someone else who wants to chime in"
KIWI: "Who??!"
MW: "A person with other information I can only share with their permission"
KIWI: "Do you have permission?!!!"
MW: "Not really, no. But they claim he sexually abused them in some way"
KIWI-SPERG: "YOU SUCK NOW THIS ISN'T ENOUGH INFORMATION I HATE YOU! YOU'RE FAKE! PROVE YOU WERE WITH PHIL!"
MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"

I'm starting to see a pattern forming here.

 

[neger psykolog]

MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"
KIWI: "So didja fuck em?!"
MW: "Yes"
KIWI: "Is your name Kim from this website?"
MW: "Yes. Here is my twitter"
KIWI: "Is this you in this picture at Phil's?"
MW: "Maybe, dunno."
KIWI: "Prove it!"
MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"
KIWI: "Well then how do we know he owes you money?"
MW: "Because I came on here to rattle his cage"
KIWI: "Well what if he doesn't pay?!"
MW: "I'll ruin him with damning evidence"
KIWI: "Like what?!!"
MW: "Videos, photos, etc."
KIWI: "Can we see them?!"
MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"
KIWI: "What if he does pay?"
MW: "Then my story here ends but there might be someone else who wants to chime in"
KIWI: "Who??!"
MW: "A person with other information I can only share with their permission"
KIWI: "Do you have permission?!!!"
MW: "Not really, no. But they claim he sexually abused them in some way"
KIWI-SPERG: "YOU SUCK NOW THIS ISN'T ENOUGH INFORMATION I HATE YOU! YOU'RE FAKE! PROVE YOU WERE WITH PHIL!"
MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"

I'm starting to see a pattern forming here.

dis nigga must got dem street smarts dsp always tellin me about

 

[Skeletor]

Why is this so important for people to go on and on and on for several posts trying to disprove shit?

It's an entertaining story, nothing more. Phil is not some public high profile figure where we must know the truth!

Some people believe it, some do not.

We all have our own thoughts which we've shared.

Let it play out and enjoy the ride. No need to go on rants for pages of this thread being condescending because someone doesn't agree with you.

Jeez.

A. Autism

B. It hurts the credibility of everything else that gets posted here if we treat a bunch of tall tales as though they were credible.

 

[PhilCosby]

Honestly, as fucked-up as it seems, it's possible that the entire thing was just for Phil's benefit. He NEEDED money urgently, for whatever reason (let's just say it actually is fucking taxes).

The theory: This bogeyman was created with Phil's knowledge and consent, and Phil benefitted from it. It's debatable how much he'd have received had he begged his usual way without the escort speculation going on but Phil has gone on record saying he did so well BECAUSE of it.

Phil's demonstrated in the past he's not shy in talking shit about himself during jackbox games because he wanted to win them, and nothing which was said by the escort was damaging at all to Phil IMO. The escort is a real escort but was also a big Phil fan and might still be, for all we know. Phil is accustomed to earning substantially more around December/January and created a way to ensure this would continue despite the YouTube money falling.

That's the theory anyway - the facts are currently that this escort no longer is too interested in getting revenge on Phil. In the past there was this whole "even if he pays I'm gonna fuck with him" kinda thing going on. Now it's complete indifference. So either an escort is happy they are got paid for services rendered, or Phil is happy people thought his escort fan rumours were real enough for people to support him heavily through December.

Time may reveal the truth.

I agree with your assessment except for one thing. I don't think Phil knew at all what was happening. Kimberlie was a true fan of Phil's since 2015 so it stands to reason that she may have wanted to help him. The same thing extends to that Mod that started the Browniegate thing. But one thing I know about Phil from watching him is that he is a shitty actor. And he was genuinely scared when Kimberlie started shitposting.

None of this means that if Kimberlie is full of shit then Phil's GF is real like Neger seems to suggest (the way I seem to be reading it). But it does mean that Phil's fans are willing to go to autistic lengths to discredit Kiwi Farms as some sort of detractor community and lump everybody that doesn't like Phil up with this new boogeyman.


As for the NDA, it really doesn't matter if it has been broken or even real. Her story for not wanting to break the NDA is that she doesn't want to get blacklisted from her network. A quick search is that she is a member of PureVIP and I haven't seen her in anything else.

The thing is that it is just one network of many. Preferred 411, TER, BestGFE, NightShift, etc. Getting blacklisted from one network is like getting fired from a job in a town littered with hiring signs. She has nothing to lose, aside from a new membership fee, from breaking a NDA.

 

[wilji1090]

Some people just want DSP to keep going on out of sheer malice. They don't really want this story to be true because it would likely mean the end of their prized lolcow. Honestly, it's a little sad. If Phil turns out to be Harvey Weinstein 2.0 then it's the end of him and he'll go the way of Chris-chan.

The thing is that it is just one network of many. Preferred 411, TER, BestGFE, NightShift, etc. Getting blacklisted from one network is like getting fired from a job in a town littered with hiring signs. She has nothing to lose, aside from a new membership fee, from breaking a NDA.

Not necessarily, I would presume that an escort being blacklisted by a single network would probably be akin to being blackballed during the Red Scare and no other network would want to touch her at that point. I'm sure there's ways around it in some capacity, but even still there's a possibility of the client she broke NDA with also informing other networks about her, so there is that.

 

[PhilCosby]

Not necessarily, I would presume that an escort being blacklisted by a single network would probably be akin to being blackballed during the Red Scare and no other network would want to touch her at that point. I'm sure there's ways around it in some capacity, but even still there's a possibility of the client she broke NDA with also informing other networks about her, so there is that.

The problem is that I am having trouble finding anything in these networks that addresses this. Most prostitutes don't offer NDA's. If you start going through ads and sites of these networked girls, mentions of any NDA is far and few in between. The more I poke around, the more this whole thing sounds like a self imposed selling point not enforced by anyone. It has been mentioned in this thread already that there is no legal binding to it. But I don't see anything that says that these are required by any of these networks.

But more to the point, so long as you have money for their fees they will take you in. Preferred 411 charges everyone that signs up, for instance. I can't imagine them passing up money.

 

[Kosher Dill]

MW: "I have signed an NDA that keeps me from confirming nor denying anything that puts me with my client in any professional capacity"

"... but I can still tell you how big his wang was, what his fetishes are, how he performed in bed, what "extra services" he purchased, who's in his family photos, what the inside of his house looks like, what we did together, what we ate together, how he spends his money, what he said to me on the phone, and who his previous sexual partners are. But that's all I can say, I signed an airtight NDA."

 

[Xenomorph]

I'll restate my deeply personal religious beliefs. There is no GF and there never was:

View attachment 352285View attachment 352286

My almonds are still suitably activated and I'll say the same thing I did 10 days ago:

Its even the same length too. Shyiiit

 

[MysteryWoman]

The problem is that I am having trouble finding anything in these networks that addresses this. Most prostitutes don't offer NDA's. If you start going through ads and sites of these networked girls, mentions of any NDA is far and few in between. The more I poke around, the more this whole thing sounds like a self imposed selling point not enforced by anyone. It has been mentioned in this thread already that there is no legal binding to it. But I don't see anything that says that these are required by any of these networks.

But more to the point, so long as you have money for their fees they will take you in. Preferred 411 charges everyone that signs up, for instance. I can't imagine them passing up money.

My site didnt say it at first either, most don't I suggest book a date and the NDA will come into play, if there is no NDA / Companionship agreement no client will even book the escort since then you have no guarantee as client that your private info such as address, phone nr, id etc goes public thats why pretty much every escort is forced to work with one. The NDA comes into play as soon as they push through for the set date. I'm sure there are Escorts that work without one that are not part of an escort network but what client in his or her right mind would book such an escort with no privacy guarantee whatsoever? Specially since a lot of clients are either married, have a girlfriend or are respectable business men or even both.

 

[wilji1090]

The problem is that I am having trouble finding anything in these networks that addresses this. Most prostitutes don't offer NDA's. If you start going through ads and sites of these networked girls, mentions of any NDA is far and few in between. The more I poke around, the more this whole thing sounds like a self imposed selling point not enforced by anyone. It has been mentioned in this thread already that there is no legal binding to it. But I don't see anything that says that these are required by any of these networks.

But more to the point, so long as you have money for their fees they will take you in. Preferred 411 charges everyone that signs up, for instance. I can't imagine them passing up money.

One important distinction: She's an escort, not a prostitute. A small distinction to be sure, but one nevertheless. Escorts are hired for their company, nothing sexual is promised and is just a byproduct of chemistry between the escort and his or her client. I've mentioned it before but escorts work like the BDSM community in that contracts are sacrosanct. You can't just break contract without a reason to and doing so is severely frowned upon with severe consequences following such an action. In Kimberlie's case, she could potentially lose the protection of her network, and even lose the opportunity to join with another one. I assume networks communicate fairly regularly about derelict clients to warn their men and women so it's not in the realm of impossibility to image these same networks also warn one another about problematic escorts (ones who break NDA, ones with STDs, and so forth)

EDIT: With regards to the NDA that MW and Phil signed? I could imagine that there was a lot of fine print that Phil did not read (namely with regards to what led to Kimberlie coming to this place to rattle his cage); however, if he did indeed sign it then it's all on him. He can't claim that he didn't know because a signature implies you've read and understood the contents of such a contract. It does strike me to be in Phil's character to jump headfirst into something without thinking it through, so why should a contract be any different?

 

[James Smith]

Clearly nobody is reading anything, they just see the avatars and start REEing.

reee.

 

[HansGruber]

"... but I can still tell you how big his wang was, what his fetishes are, how he performed in bed, what "extra services" he purchased, who's in his family photos, what the inside of his house looks like, what we did together, what we ate together, how he spends his money, what he said to me on the phone, and who his previous sexual partners are. But that's all I can say, I signed an airtight NDA."

And because none of that can be proven with evidence it is all conjectural he/she said but it does border on unprofessional but then, so is not paying your escort.

 

[BlackBerserker1]

And because none of that can be proven with evidence it is all conjectural he/she said but it does border on unprofessional but then, so is not paying your escort.

He paid, he paid in full, and he paid before the proposed date. She just panicked because he blocked her twitter, when she was the one who was an escort, with links in her profile, with posts on her account lining up with his posts making it evident what was going on. Eye rolling cringy stupid stuff for her to do. Its supposed to be hush hush but you have a girl who keeps messaging you and replying to your posts on twitter who has a back log of posts detailing they went away the same time as you met your girlfriend. Its autistic what she did. Complete dumb ass.

Anybody would of done what Phil did. She was being an idiot.

Edit: Of course this post has been up a couple of minutes and it already has dislikes from people who dont have the balls to actually post anything here but just dislike anything that puts MW in a bad light.

If you wanted to have a secret sexual relationship with an escort, and that escort decides to post status updates about them going on a trip to your town, complain about flight delays and then messages you constantly knowing anybody could click on their profile and see the coincidence....... JUST LIKE EXACTLY HAPPENED. you are a mongoloid.