Designated Whiner Shitting Street - General non DSP-specific discussion and stupid questions goes here

SilkyEnigma said:
I understand KG and BSV are never going to shut up, I should of clarified myself. When I say I want them to shutup, I mean for them to stop having valid points that can't be dismissed as the usual bullshit they spew. For instance this is KGs most recent post on those tumbleweed forums.
View attachment 350530
As much as I dislike KG, he's right. This is the biggest evidence @MysteryWoman presented and it can be easily replicated. Not only that, any details asked about she immediately hides behind this magical NDA that if you talk about dick sizes, talk publically what you did with a client, talk to other escorts about your client and it's totally okay, but if a DM is revealed the contract is broken. Makes no sense.

If I appear to came off aggressive I apologize but I'm just asking questions and she's dodging them, flipping, or spinning her story. She is offering nothing provable, she was offered a chance to talk to BSV and ran, I'm giving her a chance to redeem herself on any platform she chooses and she says I want to fuck her, there's contradiction after contradiction and im just asking some basic questions.

I saw you post something about KiwiFarms is a place for anyone to have a voice and speak their peace, well when that person gets confronted with valid points of being a liar and just dips a dodges every opportunity to prove their legitimacy, what happens then? Do we continue to be in the bliss of ignorance just for entertainment sake?

When people like KG and BSV have valid points in their statements and you get out witted by BSV on stream, there's some obvious holes in you and your story that somebody should address.
Click to expand...

Yea her revealing a clients dick size has to be against the NDA..... shit half the stuff she said about phil would have to be against the NDA. That is more telling to me then even the flip flopping she did on the time line. along with there being 5 others escorts..... FIVE#!!!???? lmao come on now...... and then the most bizarre one being a hot 23 year old girls with no social media who only uses the internet to watch dsp... lmao
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Girlieplier
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Stay safe, Xenomorph and NumberingYourState
I've been hesitant to post much in either thread since I enjoy the laughs more then the drama. I decided to post in this thread tonight because the amount of ass-licking for MW is profound in the other thread. I'm still on the fence about the "first" story arc MW brought to the table but also think the King Snort is capable of such arrogance. But the rest of MW story after the origin is pretty far-fetched IMO.

The main reasoning for my post now is that most people following Phillys thread are MW pussy whipped, and the other half are putting too much thought into the story. Who gives a fuck what the outcome is? Phil is and always will be a failed lets player. All this attention he is gaining here is only making his paypigs agree with him more. (yea, yea, he didnt prove his taxes either, who cares?)

In the end, all this drama is doing is giving him more attention then he deserves. Those that agree with EVERYTHING MW says is a cuck. Those that pick through the story with a fine toothed comb, need a life.

P.S. I'm sick of reading through 10 pages of circle jerking every hour.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: DumbCWCQuote, Phoebe Cates, JamFlowMan and 14 others
AmericFront said:
Is the "debate me on stream" the new fight me at the playground? https://mobile.twitter.com/TheyCallMeTXT/status/950444689903284224
Click to expand...

"I mean, if you’ve got the guts to say it to my face...."
Click to expand...

406.jpg
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vergil, NumberingYourState, PrincessHomura and 2 others
I have a question for the "This is 100% bullshit crowd":

How do you explain the long history of MW's twitter account, and the references to the recent Phil drama on her escort website? Is this a perfectly executed long con? A former fan of Phil who happens to be an escort that became a detractor? A current fan of Phil and escort working with him to harvest pity bucks?

EDIT: I don't mean to imply that I believe everything MW has said 100%. There is plenty that is way too far fetched. I'm just genuinely curious about the thoughts of the people that believe absolutely nothing that she has said so far.
 
Last edited:
The fact that she has a history of mentioning DSP on Twitter does not have anything to do with the claim that she's interacted with him in person in the last 6 months or that he paid her tens of thousands of dollars for not-quite-prostitution. It also doesn't have anything to do with the claims that he's into having sex in public, that he's hired 5 other not-quite-prostitutes, that he has drugged and date raped a woman, or that he has a small penis.

Some stuff she has said seems plausible based on what we actually know is true. It's still only plausible. Other stuff seems outlandish based on what we actually know.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Darksydepickle, neger psykolog, Girlieplier and 2 others
SoapQueen1 said:
The fact that she has a history of mentioning DSP on Twitter does not have anything to do with the claim that she's interacted with him in person in the last 6 months or that he paid her tens of thousands of dollars for not-quite-prostitution. It also doesn't have anything to do with the claims that he's into having sex in public, that he's hired 5 other not-quite-prostitutes, that he has drugged and date raped a woman, or that he has a small penis.

Some stuff she has said seems plausible based on what we actually know is true. It's still only plausible. Other stuff seems outlandish based on what we actually know.
Click to expand...
Phil is the sort of nigger to fuck with the lights off AND under the covers.

I dont see him being an exhibitionist.
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: ANDS!, Fascist Frederick and neger psykolog
Murmur said:
I have a question for the "This is 100% bullshit crowd":

How do you explain the long history of MW's twitter account, and the references to the recent Phil drama on her escort website? Is this a perfectly executed long con? A former fan of Phil who happens to be an escort that became a detractor? A current fan of Phil and escort working with him to harvest pity bucks?

EDIT: I don't mean to imply that I believe everything MW has said 100%. There is plenty that is way too far fetched. I'm just genuinely curious about the thoughts of the people that believe absolutely nothing that she has said so far.
Click to expand...

Maybe a legit hooker quit the business and her page got hijacked? Maybe she is a real hooker who's also trolling? I admit it's impressive, but until someone can explain how this NDA allows her to publicly reveal her clients, I'm calling bullshit on at least part of this.
 
Skeealator said:
Maybe a legit hooker quit the business and her page got hijacked? Maybe she is a real hooker who's also trolling? I admit it's impressive, but until someone can explain how this NDA allows her to publicly reveal her clients, I'm calling bullshit on at least part of this.
Click to expand...
Alright, let's think together here, what does "revealing her clients" entail? Just a name? if so, then everybody's name was uttered somewhere on the web or anywhere really. There would be daily headlines every day about escort scandals..etc., but this isn't how it happens in reality, is it?

Well here it is: what's primarily hidden by the NDA is Phil's documentation: Copies of his ID cards, signed contracts..etc. If those leak, then it is known without a doubt that he hired Kim. That is concrete evidence that if forged, would land Kim in some serious legal trouble, trouble that's worth far more than a couple thou.

Also, you need to realize that NDAs cover telling the truth about stuff, but it doesn't cover outright lies, so when she says stuff about Philly-Boy's size or smell, I take that as a very targeted lie, meaning that she lied to us about it in order to inform Phil that she won't shy away from revealing even the most minor detail if he skips out on payment.
 
neural said:
Alright, let's think together here, what does "revealing her clients" entail? Just a name? if so, then everybody's name was uttered somewhere on the web or anywhere really. There would be daily headlines every day about escort scandals..etc., but this isn't how it happens in reality, is it?

Well here it is: what's primarily hidden by the NDA is Phil's documentation: Copies of his ID cards, signed contracts..etc. If those leak, then it is known without a doubt that he hired Kim. That is concrete evidence that if forged, would land Kim in some serious legal trouble, trouble that's worth far more than a couple thou.

Also, you need to realize that NDAs cover telling the truth about stuff, but it doesn't cover outright lies, so when she says stuff about Philly-Boy's size or smell, I take that as a very targeted lie, meaning that she lied to us about it in order to inform Phil that she won't shy away from revealing even the most minor detail if he skips out on payment.
Click to expand...

Don't be obtuse. The hooker can't reveal that the client fucked her for money. That's the whole point of the NDA: if he doesn't pay, the ho tells the world and ruins his reputation/marriage.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MidUSA
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back