Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

Jerry's doing a great job convincing me he totally has a social life and interacts with the outside world and isn't a total NEET troon by releasing a video about Bront drama ahead of several projects he was already working on mere days after it comes to light.

All the other analysts have been issuing their statements today, so Peet had to make sure their video went out so they could go "They're not doing it right!"
 
is there like a video or something that catalogs all the pedophilia in stockholm, maybe a forum post I can reference?

I made something for you fags


I tried to avoid "deadnaming" peet so that way fans of his wouldn't brush it off but it's really just me laughing at him so I'm not sure it was worth the effort OH WELL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I made something for you fags


I tried to avoid "deadnaming" peet so that way fans of his wouldn't brush it off but it's really just me laughing at him so I'm not sure it was worth the effort OH WELL
The very fact that you put Misato in the thumbnail means he'll flip the whole "sex pervert" thing back at you, since ANIME IS JUST PERV-PANDERING GUYS

On a real note, nice job. lol


Oh, dear me, do I have something...

http://joshscorcher.tumblr.com/post/170295419427/so-according-to-some-more-digging-that-came-out
https://archive.fo/9MfAc

(Can someone else screenshot it? Windows Ink Workspace isn't working on my computer. I'll copy/paste it though.)

Anonymous asked: So according to some more digging that came out apparently someone said that the domain you guys were apart of, it includes lightning bliss but unsure about you, knew about his previous encounters and did nothing sooner? The video was mirrored onto lily’s Channel if you were curious about what I am referring to. Is this true?

Josh said:
I saw Patchwork’s video. This is my first time hearing about them, and it’s sad that happened to them. If you haven’t, please drop a comment of support for her here.
But here’s a question.
Why is Lily condemning us for not coming to a conclusion about Toon’s behavior sooner… when Patchwork clearly stated they went to Lily for support about Toon’s behavior before all of this went down… likely indicating Lily knew about Toon’s sexual escapades before all this went down and said nothing?
Lily, if you’re reading this, I’ve turned the other cheek for a long time. I can tolerate petty insults and snipes from you. But slander? That’s where I am now forced to defend myself.

Patch said:
Lily kept quiet because I asked her too.
I was already being lambasted with dogpiling every time I tried to speak out when Lily first took me in, so when I talked to her I asked her to stay out of it and let me handle it myself. I was afraid that her getting involved would get her hurt.
Since then Lily and I have become close and I’ve become more comfortable with letting her help me stand up for myself.
Please don’t frame her as some monster for not speaking out when I first came to her. That is on me. Yes, it as a mistake on my part to ask her not to, and I regret it deeply, but she was just trying to be a good friend and do as I asked.

Josh said:
Odd, that’s:
A. Not what Lily said. (If the anon is to be believed, I couldn’t find the comment in question.)
B. Exactly what Lily is lambasting us for. I don’t find that very fair.

Patch said:
Here’s the thing.
When I asked Lily to stay out of my fight, I was in the wrong.
I should have asked for her help. I should have asked her to tell the world about Zak, because if I had, a lot of this could have been prevented. Her not helping me was on me.
But there comes a line where “please dont take this public” needs to be ignored. Keep the victim anonymous? Absolutely. Censor any evidence you have to protect the victim and their family? Definitely.
But stuff like this needs to be brought to everyone’s attention, because keeping everything under wraps is how Zak got away with my abuse in the first place.
I know you’re trying to do the right thing Josh. But if this never got out none of Zak’s other victims would have had the courage to step foreward, even me.
And that’s not to say Lily did NOTHING when I came to her. She published heavily censored screenshots of my confessions to her tumblr with my permission. I merely asked her not to get into the fight directly, with which she complied.
She helped the best she could when I was still afraid of getting hurt for speaking out.

Josh said:
Two problems.
1. Lily agreed to that. So, she’s equally to blame as you are.
2. We intended to make public statements about Zak.
We had to ensure that this behavior was reported to the proper authorities once we had the evidence and report ready. After that, remaining publicly silent about it while the investigation was ongoing was paramount. Investigations need to have minimal interference to ensure that all the relevant details are uncovered properly. If cases like this are made public before the authorities can properly examine the facts, then it can jeopardize the process and lead to criminals escaping justice.
The call and pictures were leaked before any of us could confirm Zak’s arrest, prepare statements about the state of future projects, censor the victim’s name from evidence, etc. Now that everyone knows and is calling him out on it, he’s deleted all of his social media and now we know nothing about where he is or what he’s doing. So let me repeat: no one knows where the sexual predator is because someone jumped the gun and went public too early. Not only that, but there’s a fustercluck of misinformation going around and Lily is now contributing to it.
There’s a certain degree of finesse and professionalism that these situations must be handled rather than just “Kill the pedophile and let the masses know.”

Patch said:
I understand your perspective Josh, but I just can’t agree with it.
I understand that the situation was handled poorly and is rather dangerous. I understand that you had the best of intent, and a plan was in place. But I just cant agree with you on the leaking being a bad thing.

Josh said:
The leaking is bad because the misinformation spreading is hurting people. People Eli care about. People Aeon care about. People I care about.
What Toon did was awful and inexcusable, and my heart goes out to you and everyone else who was hurt by him. However, that doesn’t mean that people who have also been hurt by Toon should get trampled over to bring him down. The ends don’t justify the means.

Patch said:
Then where was this outrage when Zak groped Kitty?
Where was this outrage when so many men and women tried to come forward and fight their own fights like I did?
It shouldnt take a video from Lily for people to stand up to an abuser. I shouldn’t need her help. And believe me, I get why most of you stayed quiet through Zak’s less vicious offenses. You guys thought you could fix him, change him, help him get better. You believed he wanted to change.
But change doesn’t come unless you force it to.
Im not saying this whole situation was handled well. Like I said in my video, there are things we all should have done differently.
But right now, reaching out to victims, elevating their voices, and making sure they are heard and supported is more important than anything any of us have to say about the morality of this situation.
I thank you for your kindness in sharing my video, and appreciate that you watched it at all.


Josh said:
Where was the outrage? That’s the thing. People were either:
1. Intimidated into silence by Toon.
2. Manipulated into seeing the story a different way by Toon, which caused people to not believe his victims. (I don’t know the finer details of your situation, but I’m assuming the case was similar.) Believe me, many of us feel REALLY bad about falling for it.
3. Begged by Toon for second chances to improve and be better when he was caught for the less vicious offenses.
4. Unaware of every single situation that happened.
That’s what a predator does. That’s what a manipulator does. They TRICK people. We realized he played us all for the fool when we found out about the year-worth of pedophilic grooming. We had to take him down the right way; when we had some solid, clear-cut, indisputable evidence. So in the end, we did like you wanted and forced a change; either turn yourself in, or we’ll turn you in.
With all of this information now and looking back on his behavior, it might seem obvious that he was up to something, but hindsight is 20/20.
I agree that elevating the victim’s voices and supporting them is important, as do the other reviewers. That’s what a lot of us have been doing for the past week. I’ve spent hours in calls and chats just consoling people and being a shoulder to cry on. BritishNinja has been streaming for a charity that helps victims of sexual predators which many of us participated in. Bliss has been helping out with a different but similar charity.
And this goes out to anyone else reading. If you need someone to listen to you, I’ll listen.

Again, sorry for the textual messiness. My computer's software needs repairing. What was another screenshot program I could use that isn't Print Screen and MS Paint?

Anyway, from what I can discern, this Patchworkheart person ("Patch" for brevity) was a victim of Toonkritic who went straight to Jerry for support before this shitstorm went down, but Jerry kept it under wraps (allegedly at Patch's request), meaning Jerry knew about Toonkritic's predatory behavior, and did nothing about it, the same thing he's garnering outrage against Toon's friends for. So, he gets pissed off at Josh and a whole group of other people for either "handling the pedophile with kids gloves" or keeping Toon's sexual escapades under wraps despite allegedly knowing about it, but didn't say anything about it (and denied knowledge of it when someone asked him because Horse News and this website shared it).

Basically, we have another thing to add to the list of why he's a complete lying hypocrite, and a garbage human being. The only way he can worm out of this one is if he completely shits on this Patch person and paints them as a liar for his own benefit. Patch said that Jerry posted censored screenshots of a conversation between them regarding Toon, is that still on his Tumblr (which admittedly sounds vaguely familiar)? @chadmuska, @Derped223?

Also, the little note that Patch told Jerry to keep everything secret doesn't cut it, because I'm sure Jerry would've been stubborn about it, given that he would have had a chance to expose someone who's been a frequent detractor of his as a pedophile/sex offender. Josh pointed the same thing out, Jerry agreed to keeping everything about Toon under wraps. The excuse that he wouldn't have wanted to trust a secondhand source won't cut it either, and this post should tell you exactly why.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jerry did respond to Josh BTW. Surprised you didn't include them. There's a lot of b'aaawing, real old school victim complex Jerry shit.

upload_2018-1-30_19-49-15.png

upload_2018-1-30_19-49-28.png

http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/170297568520/so-according-to-some-more-digging-that-came-out/embed
https://archive.is/h0bI9

upload_2018-1-30_19-50-15.png

http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/17...u-seen-by-now-by-josh-is-asking-why-you/embed
https://archive.is/TQJct

I think it should be noted that patch, the person whose video about toon Jerry mirrored, goes by "pagan_bae" on twitter and

oh my!

lookie what we have here....

upload_2018-1-30_19-42-9.png

https://twitter.com/pagan_bae/status/958106126238674944
https://archive.is/mKK16

:thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking:
 
I think it should be noted that patch, the person whose video about toon Jerry mirrored, goes by "pagan_bae" on twitter and

oh my!

lookie what we have here....

upload_2018-1-30_19-42-9-png.371823

https://twitter.com/pagan_bae/status/958106126238674944
https://archive.is/mKK16

:thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking::thinking:
So she's another one of Jerry's unconditional Yes-men. What should I have expected?

also
https://archive.is/m6v7H
https://archive.is/iJRk6
upload_2018-1-30_16-56-35.png

upload_2018-1-30_17-15-50.png


Good fucking god someone actually linked her to Stockholm and she ignored it lmao :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Anyway, Josh made a post responding to Jerry's response.
http://joshscorcher.tumblr.com/post/170315821987/hiya-josh-i-want-to-start-this-ask-message-by
https://archive.is/q6UTK

Gonna copy/paste again because this is quicker than print screen and paint.
Anonymous asked: Hiya, Josh. I want to start this ask message by sending my thoughts out to you and your friends. It sounds like this has become a stressful moment for you all, and I do wish you well in dealing with the ToonKritic Conundrum. But for the questions at hand, I have a couple to ask. First, regarding Peet's video on Toon, how much of it do you agree with and disagree with in what Peet talked about, and in regards to the statements you disagree with, do you have any rebuttals to what Peet said?

Thing is, Peet is an outsider looking in, making a sweeping judgment on EVERYONE who knew Toon.

Example: I wasn’t an active member of the domain (Toon’s Discord). I showed up for the occasional livestream, but I never engaged in chats. Anyone can tell you I’m not a fan of large chatrooms and the only reason I was a part of the “coping-with-toon” room was that people needed my help. But apparently, I knew EVERYTHING that went on and knew EVERYTHING that Toon did.

There’s a little more nuance to the situation and I don’t appreciate it being ignored.

You know how many people were in the domain? Nearly 50. And people want to claim that EVERY one of these people knew EVERY little incident involving Toon?

I find that very hard to imagine.

And again, here are the reasons that outrage over Toon never happened sooner. People were either:

1. Intimidated into silence by Toon.

2. Manipulated into seeing the story a different way by Toon, which caused people to not believe his victims. (I don’t know the finer details of your situation, but I’m assuming the case was similar.) Believe me, many of us feel REALLY bad about falling for it.

3. Begged by Toon for second chances to improve and be better when he was caught for the less vicious offenses.

4. Unaware of every single situation that happened.

Some people were one of these things. Some people were several. But if Peet wants to take the easy way out and blame all of us for obviously knowing everything when she was in a similar situation as many of us were, then fine. Go ahead and be wrong.

As BritishNinja said, when he first heard about this from the victim, his first instinct was to gather indisputable evidence so there wasn’t any way he could twist it. He then slowly started talking to people to let them know about everything Toon did. As people shared testimony, it soon came to light that Toon would likely try to find people sympathetic to him to get “his side” of the story and try to paint himself as a victim. We realized we had to get to everyone else first, so we kept it silent until his closest friends and colleagues knew about it. We weren’t even going to let him try to talk to people to smooth things over. We were successful to the point where the only people who were vouching for him were his family, particularly his grandmother who tried to guilt us into backing down with the “dindu nuffin” and “he’s a dumb kid who made a mistake” rhetoric.

Look, I’m glad that Lily cares. Especially for Patchwork. Lily did a great thing there sheltering them and I’m glad she’s talking to and helping Toon’s victims. I’m glad Lily’s spreading awareness of the incident, making it clear that Toon’s actions are intolerable, and also informing people on spotting potential warning signs of predatory behavior. Contrary to what some people believe (I read every message her fans send me), I don’t think Lily’s evil or always wrong. But I don’t appreciate blaming innocent people, several of whom are also victims of Toon. Lily probably has the best of intentions, but contrary to what she may think, that’s not helping.
Good lord, Josh is such an anti-cow. Being berated by Jerry and still correctly maintains that he's the right one, and still doesn't hate him. Someone's gotta photoshop his face on Jesus.

I should preface this by saying that I'll retract part of the thing I wrote in big, bold letters earlier, that Jerry knew about Toon's predatory behavior, because he probably didn't, unless Patch knew and confided that into him. But for now, I'll retract it. And Josh does nail it on the head by essentially saying that not everyone knew about Toon, not everyone knew every detail about Toon, and people could have been manipulated by Toon, etc. As I said, apparently, Jerry only knew about what happened to Patch, but that's the extent of where I'm seemingly wrong. He still did nothing about it. He made no tweets, Tumblr posts, or even videos regarding the stories that he was told about Toon, in this case, Patch's account. And yet Jerry wants to scorn other people who, as Josh claims, didn't know anything or didn't want to come forward (or couldn't come forward, which leads me into...).

See, here's the other thing. Jerry has a platform. Jerry is (debatably) influential. And Jerry had an opportunity to take this pedophile (who also happened to be a detractor of his) down handed to him on a golden platter. If Jerry "tried to" go public with the information (something that directly contradicts what Patch said, that Jerry posted censored screenshots), as he explicitly states, then why were none of his fans aware? I imagine this kind of thing would, at the very least, come up in his Patron Discord server, so why wasn't it spread around by any of those guys? I'll reiterate the points I made earlier, why would Jerry agree to keep secret about a sex offender? Jerry has trusted secondhand sources before, especially people who have talked shit about those he doesn't like, and he's not above spreading rumors (even false ones) about people who talk shit about him. So the burden is once again on him; Why didn't he do anything?

wew
 
Curses! My lack of experience as a writer spells my undoing! All this time I thought writing literally thousands of words and dozens of chapters across several books about the manner of which underaged horse vaginas gets boned was a red flag that the author might be a pedophile, but in actuality its basically a harmless transition from one plot point to the next, the literary version of fading to black!

This is a point that has truly destroyed our arguments and our will to live and it is totally not someone willingly misinforming themselves and others around them because of a favour bestowed upon them by Jerry.

edit: Oh my goodness I didnt even realise Patch tried to use the "Lily's asexual!" argument. Wonder why she refuses to read it :thinking::thinking::thinking:
 
Last edited:
So she's another one of Jerry's unconditional Yes-men. What should I have expected?

also
https://archive.is/m6v7H
https://archive.is/iJRk6
View attachment 371887
View attachment 371910

Good fucking god someone actually linked her to Stockholm and she ignored it lmao :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Anyway, Josh made a post responding to Jerry's response.
http://joshscorcher.tumblr.com/post/170315821987/hiya-josh-i-want-to-start-this-ask-message-by
https://archive.is/q6UTK

Gonna copy/paste again because this is quicker than print screen and paint.



Good lord, Josh is such an anti-cow. Being berated by Jerry and still correctly maintains that he's the right one, and still doesn't hate him. Someone's gotta photoshop his face on Jesus.

I should preface this by saying that I'll retract part of the thing I wrote in big, bold letters earlier, that Jerry knew about Toon's predatory behavior, because he probably didn't, unless Patch knew and confided that into him. But for now, I'll retract it. And Josh does nail it on the head by essentially saying that not everyone knew about Toon, not everyone knew every detail about Toon, and people could have been manipulated by Toon, etc. As I said, apparently, Jerry only knew about what happened to Patch, but that's the extent of where I'm seemingly wrong. He still did nothing about it. He made no tweets, Tumblr posts, or even videos regarding the stories that he was told about Toon, in this case, Patch's account. And yet Jerry wants to scorn other people who, as Josh claims, didn't know anything or didn't want to come forward (or couldn't come forward, which leads me into...).

See, here's the other thing. Jerry has a platform. Jerry is (debatably) influential. And Jerry had an opportunity to take this pedophile (who also happened to be a detractor of his) down handed to him on a golden platter. If Jerry "tried to" go public with the information (something that directly contradicts what Patch said, that Jerry posted censored screenshots), as he explicitly states, then why were none of his fans aware? I imagine this kind of thing would, at the very least, come up in his Patron Discord server, so why wasn't it spread around by any of those guys? I'll reiterate the points I made earlier, why would Jerry agree to keep secret about a sex offender? Jerry has trusted secondhand sources before, especially people who have talked shit about those he doesn't like, and he's not above spreading rumors (even false ones) about people who talk shit about him. So the burden is once again on him; Why didn't he do anything?

wew

And this is just January I wonder what next month will bring
 
Something really irked me about the statement Patch made, which made me wonder if Peet is actually grooming them as well. I forget where it was, but I noticed during MisanthroPony's reupload of the video.

I think it might be worth keeping an eye on Peet on this, because I have a feeling they're not even different from Toon.
 
If memory serves right the closest thing to a lawsuit even being posed as a possibility was back when Peet had supposedly reported FNGR to canadian authorities, which totally sounds like a for real thing that actually happened for serious. As for the Animechristie thing all I remember is a youtube copyright claim being carried out and then being withdrawn.

but I would fucking laugh my ass off if an actual lawsuit happened between Peet and Josh.
 
As for the Animechristie thing all I remember is a youtube copyright claim being carried out and then being withdrawn.
From Peet's own video, apparently they actually baited Animechristie into making the copyright claim, knowing full well that Christie didn't have the ability to get legal support.
 
Don't take this seriously. This is just Jerry trying to act tough. Not only does Josh have a considerably stronger case than Jerry does given he actually slandered Josh and is just lying about it as well as pleaded for his death publically, but Josh lives in the states where online regulations as far as punishments are considered are very unlikely.

Remember that he never made a proper response to Josh's video, just that it was all lies despite never actually watching it.
 
Don't take this seriously. This is just Jerry trying to act tough. Not only does Josh have a considerably stronger case than Jerry does given he actually slandered Josh and is just lying about it as well as pleaded for his death publically, but Josh lives in the states where online regulations as far as punishments are considered are very unlikely.

Remember that he never made a proper response to Josh's video, just that it was all lies despite never actually watching it.
It would still be incredibly funny to see him try, and probably screech some more about Trump when he fails, don’t you agree?
 
Back