Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

You'd be on immune suppressors for the rest of your life, and even then you'd probably eventually croak when the body rejected it because it was so genetically different.
Yeah, and to have a child it’s not just having a womb, it’s all the hormones that are released by various parts of your body when they need to be. Otherwise you’re just going to end up with a miscarriage rotting inside of you (as there is no natural vagina).
 
If I am not above or exempt from it and it provides direct benefits to me, then why should I expend any effort to unlearn it and become an ally? What's my motivation here?

Exactly!!! Why the fuck would I want to ally against my own and my people's own interests?!
 
Well, as said, it's not permanent -- the uterus is removed afterwards. I just find it interesting, in an academic kind of way.

I have no idea if it will ever be available for transwomen. I doubt it will in the near future.
 
Exactly!!! Why the fuck would I want to ally against my own and my people's own interests?!
Yeah, sorta. It's a pretty big flaw in their argument. If white people adopted that rigid and inflexible IDpol worldview I don't think they would be very happy about it as it breaks down to basically "us vs them (so side with us or we will call you a racist)" and most people have their own lives to worry about and could give a fuck if someone called them racist if their own well-being was at stake.

But many people don't subscribe to IDpol and instead adhere to concepts like individual liberty, egalitarianism, and meritocracy. This will, it is hoped, keep people from ruthlessly fucking each other over because of simple differences in race. Ymmv.
 
1516573123283.png
 
For the glory of Satan, of course!
What's wrong with your faaaaccceee?
26101904008_62e25eb9a4_b.jpg
I'm looking at the proportions of their head and it's like one and a half times bigger than it's supposed to be. I haven't a clue how a person can physically do this.
Maybe my eyes glazed over reading this but I'm having the hardest time following along with their logic. So women who like women but the women are men is not lesbian erasure because the person is a heterosexual man but also a woman and...uh...

...There's just too much things you have to keep track of for this to make sense out of. Is this how air traffic controllers feel?
What about characters who don't show any signs of their sexuality? Do you just assume that they're heterosexual unless they explicitly express homosexuality? How hetereonormative.
 
Exactly what do they mean by top 100 films?Do they mean films that made money or the best reviewed films?The films that tend to make the most money are PG-13 so they usually avoid explicit mention of sexuality even less so approach things like bi/gay/trans.The best reviewed films on the other hand tend to be R rated and frequently approach such issues in one form or another.Of course these are trends not rules so there are exceptions.
Still just at the top of my head when it comes to Best picture nominees in the 2007-2014 period we have M ilk,The Imitation game,Dallas Buyers club,Philomena,The kids are all right,Black swan as movies with characters that are not 100% straight.And these are movies with gay or bi characters that got nominated and i remember there might be gay/bi characters in some other nominees that i forgot.So where exactly is the lack of movies with non-straights?
 
Last edited:
"us vs them (so side with us or we will call you a racist)"

More like "side with us and we'll call you a racist anyway and demand all your money and time." So if you're going to be a racist anyway, at least be one where you don't even have to associate with hideous danger hair freaks.
 
Exactly!!! Why the fuck would I want to ally against my own and my people's own interests?!
Don't ever trust quislings or traitors to their own kind. It's not possible for a person to legitimately put aside their own selfish desires entirely, our brains aren't wired that way. Someone who gets up on the cross about the awful legacy he's inherited is lying and selling crocodile tears. Someone who doesn't is by default more honest.

Of course you should show respect and compassion to people who are different than you. But... the SJW pocs operate on a principle of not showing decency to people who look different than them, so even if you want to learn how to be a wonderful ally, they're the last people you should get lessons from.
 
Of course you should show respect and compassion to people who are different than you. But... the SJW pocs operate on a principle of not showing decency to people who look different than them, so even if you want to learn how to be a wonderful ally, they're the last people you should get lessons from.

To me, it seems like all of these people who go out of their way to be "ally's" are overcompensating for something. They're in the same category as the male feminist sexual predator, they're all just miserable people who need someone to give them an excuse for their own antisocial behavior, in this case the "poc-sjw" who give white nerds the courage they need to chastise other white people for things nobody cares about.
 
Last edited:
To me, it seems like all of these people who go out of their way to be "ally's" are overcompensating for something. They're in the same category as the male feminist sexual predator, they're all just miserable people who need someone to give them an excuse for their own antisocial behavior, in this case the "poc-sjw" who give white nerds the courage they need to chastise other white people for things nobody cares about.
I wonder if that's a fallacy that has a formal name. The "I'm doing good enough" fallacy I suppose. The fallacious line of thought that says you look like a bigger hero than whoever your strawman bigot of the moment is, therefore all the horrible shit you still don't feel like changing about yourself magically doesn't matter.
 
It's like a mean girls club crossed with a caste system. The higher you are on the progressive stack, the meaner, more entitled and ungreatful you can be to the lower ones. It doesn't matter how nice the lower are, the mean girls will turn against them even if they haven't really done anything wrong.
 
It's like a mean girls club crossed with a caste system. The higher you are on the progressive stack, the meaner, more entitled and ungreatful you can be to the lower ones. It doesn't matter how nice the lower are, the mean girls will turn against them even if they haven't really done anything wrong.

It's like being the little guy who hangs around with the bully to join in on the bullying.
 
Back