Historical credibility is not in the SJW vocabulary me thinks. I've seen quite a lot complaints being tossed around by fem-nazis and SJWs about Dunkirk (the Nolan movie) for celebrating maleness. It's utterly absurd. This piece in particular is extra silly. I do hope she dies from terminal cancer. Preferably yesterday.
View attachment 376661
Also here's the link to the moronic review:
http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/news/a28515/dunkirk-movie-review/
Seems like we now should adapt historical events to suit their skewed feminist agendas.
She could go watch other TV shows and movies, like Bomb Girls (2012-), Land Girls (2009-2011), My Mother and Other Strangers (2016) Wings (1927) (World War I, but who gives a shit?), Millions Like Us (1943), Carve Her Name with Pride (195

, Julia (1977), Sophie Scholl (2005), Female Agents (200

, A Woman in Berline (2009)...
There's a lot of stuff produced about women during WWII. Very good stuff, too. This shit is hardly limited to indy movies or Oscar bait.
I've also noticed a lot of the "muh historic medieval POCs" SJWs also have a habit of not factoring in how travel worked back in those days, or have a very poor understanding of it. Since everything was either by horseback or on foot, and long journeys were incredibly treacherous most people didn't have the means of desire to travel great distances. So the only reasons someone would travel back then would be if they were a merchant looking to trade/sell their goods for the goods of a friendly neighboring country/empire, or people who for whatever reason were fleeing from something and/or needed to relocate. In both cases neither group is going to want to travel further than they need to, because the merchant isn't going to go out of his way to find buttfuck Bohemia when there's plenty of places that are much closer that will take his goods and he likely has a family back home to support, and medieval commoners did not have the modern luxuries of fast travel, modern medicine, or even just having a good source waiting at their destination and settled as soon as they were able to.
To be fair, though, those trade routes were really fucking well established, and had been basically forever:
Here's some viking dudes with an Islamic ring, circa 1400
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ring-brings-ancient-viking-islamic-civilizations-closer-together
The Phoenicians would go to England to mine tin
https://books.google.com/books?id=W...page&q=Mediterranean-Briton tin trade&f=false
The Amber trade went due North
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Road
Here's an axe made of jade found in Britian, that was mined in the Italian Alps from 4000 BC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/objects/ZRfYPmVMSgmqZyFEY8VRJA
So while Josephus Buttfuck McDirtfarmus didn't go anywhere, the guy the shovelmaker bought raw metal from probably did. You also had guys like Ahmad ibn Fadlan, who went everywhere back in the 900s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_ibn_Fadlan
Would there have been a ton of African dudes just sitting around Bohemia? Nah. But it wouldn't have been too surprising for one dude in a major city to have a middle eastern wife or something, and to see people from North Africa or the Middle East passing through on a semi-regular basis selling things. But out in bumfuck nowhere? Nope.
And this is before we get into the fucking quagmire of what the hell "black" would even mean back then.