Infected r/KotakuinAction & their ResetERA, r/KotakuInAction2 (KiA) - Hypocritical Pedo Weeaboo Gamergate Cucks in Action

  • Thread starter Thread starter WW 635
  • Start date Start date
:story:

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAc...etups_gginsf_is_leaving_kia_due_to_cancerous/
http://archive.is/Dnzoj

upload_2018-2-9_0-57-29.png

004369507105.jpg



upload_2018-2-9_1-0-10.png


upload_2018-2-9_1-0-42.png


upload_2018-2-9_1-3-21.png
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Polish Hot Dog (spicie) and Done
This research paper was published around December 2017/January 2018. I discovered a most curious omission of Kiwi Farms between revisions when not much else of note was added or removed. How bizarre.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv171205851J
upload_2018-2-15_4-17-23.png

upload_2018-2-15_4-27-49.png
Click to expand...



Original paragraph mentioning Kiwifarms:
upload_2018-2-15_4-17-56.png


Revised paragraph specifically omitting Kiwifarms:
upload_2018-2-15_4-18-40.png


:thinking:


The two revisions of the research paper compared (notable revisions screencapped):
upload_2018-2-15_4-22-27.png


upload_2018-2-15_4-31-14.png


Original document:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/40e4/3b8051dbdd3a22b2176a455a1a957fbd2c85.pdf

Revised document:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1712/1712.05851.pdf


upload_2018-2-15_4-26-15.png
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Trombonista, Polish Hot Dog (spicie) and 29 others
Just for the sake of clarity, screenshot in OP mentions "66 changes" between the two documents. Many of these are because a few references were adjusted (which means all reference numbers change in the document) and because 2-3 small amounts of text were added that spanned between pages.

In reality there are very minor changes between the documents. I sorted through them all and there are only roughly 15-20 changes most of which don't include removing text but rather adding small amounts of detail.

The omission of Kiwifarms in that specific paragraph is very curious.

There are actually no other omissions/removing of stuff like it when looking at both documents. The Kiwifarms thing is the only edit like it.

The original document mentions being reviewed by "First Monday" which is this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Monday_(journal)
http://firstmonday.org/index

upload_2018-2-15_4-48-48.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: AnonAutismo, Stay safe, purepowerlevel and 4 others
Null said:
One of the very well known SJWs (Brianna Wu / Zoe Quinn tier) told me in private once they specifically refuse to mention us because we're still small enough to ignore.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it KF that found out that Ali Rapp was a prostitute when all the gamergate e-celebs did their videos going "hur hur, Ali got fired cause she did some lewd images for her twitter" without evidence?

I can't help but think it's less that "we are a minority", and more that "people on here are so autistic they will find the truth one way or another".
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista, Polish Hot Dog (spicie), AnonAutismo and 11 others
captn_kettle said:
Wasn't it KF that found out that Ali Rapp was a prostitute when all the gamergate e-celebs did their videos going "hur hur, Ali got fired cause she did some lewd images for her twitter" without evidence?

I can't help but think it's less that "we are a minority", and more that "people on here are so autistic they will find the truth one way or another".
Click to expand...
We found that a month or two after some unknown person had archived her whore site.

We were sloppy seconds.
 
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: BestUserName, Trombonista, Polish Hot Dog (spicie) and 4 others
  • Informative
Reactions: José Mourinho, Stay safe, purepowerlevel and 3 others
Null said:
One of the very well known SJWs (Brianna Wu / Zoe Quinn tier) told me in private once they specifically refuse to mention us because we're still small enough to ignore.
Click to expand...

If this community were that harmless, then why bother "ignoring" it? It's nonsensical logic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back