ContraPoints / William Nicholas Parrott / Natalie Wynn Parrott / Nykytyne2 - GamerGhazi Cannibalism Victim, Youtube "Intellectual"

I don't get the tranny/troon agenda of wanting to fuck lesbians. Lesbians, by definition like women. I mean, that's it, no bars down. Am I offended by that? No. But what is offensive that people who refuse to take the steps to make themselves womanly or as womanly as possible (I'm talking full transition here) get offended by this aspect. Just boggles me.

Then you have the TERFs. I've dealt with TERFs before, and while not a great experience, they're easy to cut out of your life and don't need to stand on a soapbox about as they're a good minority of the Lesbian community as a whole. You know the whole "vocal minority" business as usual.

If a Lesbian woman turns you down simply because they find you unappealing due to your genetic makeup, that's not on them. That's on you. You didn't choose to be a man. Just as they didn't choose to love a woman while being a woman. You make 'think' you're woman enough for them, but no... You're not. Sorry, troondogs. Pool's closed for adult swim time. When you can be an adult and learn not ever woman is gonna give you the analrips you desire, you can come in.
 
I don't get the tranny/troon agenda of wanting to fuck lesbians. Lesbians, by definition like women. I mean, that's it, no bars down. Am I offended by that? No. But what is offensive that people who refuse to take the steps to make themselves womanly or as womanly as possible (I'm talking full transition here) get offended by this aspect. Just boggles me.

See, that's because the real goal is unquestioning validation from women. If a (gold star) lesbian will fuck you, you must REALLY be a real woman. It's the same thinking that leads to the popular "my gyno couldn't tell I had a surgical vagina!" line, except doctors are harder to bully online. They also really bank on actual females being socialized to be nice and validating no matter what; I think that's why rejection from cis women makes troons so fucking outraged, while cis gay dudes telling FtMs to fuck off on Grindr is fine and normal.
 
June is brought up at 2:24:50 by someone named Claudia. Basically, she and Contra both compliment her for going after TERFs but then make a point to remind their audience that they still have problems with her and that they don't expect everyone to be totally cool with her. I had suspected that Shoe's recent shift towards taking down TERFs was at least partially to help justify Contra's continued friendship with her and this seems to confirm.

Immediately after they start talking about Blaire White and double down on the whole "you're fake and only pretend to believe what you say so that transphobes will like you" thing, because it's just so hard to believe that a trans person might just not agree with you on everything.

Kiwi Farms mentioned again at 2:40:45.

Lindsay Ellis returns for another channel visit later in the stream.
 
Last edited:
Oh boy. I knew this was coming eventually. There is a thread on /cow/ but they miss a lot of stuff that I know someone on here has gathered.

https://8ch.net/cow/res/273634.html
So he made a video about Fascism, claimed there were three main points to it, and then got every single fucking one wrong?
I was just lurking but this has made me want to go out and see how much more idiotic a single person could be, thanks for the motivation to learn about a new cow!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grand Lunar
All that drama about Contrapoints participating in this event due to it being hosted by a supposedly "facist" student group, then when it happens it doesn't even fill half a classroom holding maybe 50 people and the Q&A session consists mostly of people who agree with Contra&Theryn with only one real dissenter/challenger. These people really don't know how to pick their battles.
 
New vid. Watched it earlier today and points of agreement:
- There definitely are many white people that are uncomfortable confronting the reality of racism, even if this is a frequently misused talking point by the far left crowd.
- You can advocate for personal responsibility while also supporting policies that you believe will help impoverished groups and communities bridge the gap.
- The number of people in jail for BS like marijuana possession is ridiculous, and I do think that ending the war on drugs once and for all would help bring positive change to predominantly black communities and poor communities in general.

Above average overall for Contra, but being a Contrapoints video it still induced quite a few eyerolls.
- She still believes that the majority of right wingers & Anti-SJWs deny the long history of racial discrimination in the United States, which is mostly untrue. Most can acknowledge that racism is why the inequality exists in the first place, but simply disagree with the tendency of people like Contra to deny anyone they consider "marginalized" ANY sense of personal agency, making infinite excuses for any and all bad behavior if it happens to be committed by one, and more or less treating racism as a boogeyman that can be attached as the default motivation to anything they disagree with.
- Apparently believes herself to be "stepping wildly out of [her] lane" by even talking about this. Isn't the whole point of the "privilege" concept supposed to be that people with more "privilege" have a responsibility to stick up for people with less? They really can't seem to make up their minds on this one.
- She dismisses any talk of the negative effects of single parenthood, because apparently the wealth of data showing a correlation between this and poverty+crime rates doesn't exist. If the facts aren't convenient, they suddenly don't exist. The worst part of this is that right leaning people are usually genuinely trying to help by offering solutions to the single parenthood problem, and implementing social programs that could help build stable families is something that Contra would probably be in favor of if she could stop equating anything she sees as "right wing" as inherently bigoted.

I still can't figure out if Contra is intentionally disingenuous or just incredibly thick. You'd think that someone who's had so many conversations with genuinely decent people who happen to disagree with her would be able to develop a better understanding of what her opponents ACTUALLY believe, but she's still either unable or unwilling to step outside her narrow worldview and realize that the world will never be as one-dimensional as she wants it to be.
 
lol so many autistic ratings on my lurv post. That shows what you people know. It's quite rare for that disorder to affect somebody with xx chromosomes.

Maybe you're all just a little jelly bc Natalie has more fangirls than you could ever dream of.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Contra's Baltimore vid... blah blah blah


Unfortunately, I didn't care for this vid, either. The original Baltimore vid was better, imo. But not for the reasons you stated.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Now that you people know I have boobies, my posts are no longer autistic. They're just dumb...

*le cwy*


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Why do mods cram multiple posts into one on this forum?

Dude, if I'd wanted all that in one post, I would have put it all in one post.

Those were replies to 3 separate people xP


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Nvm. I just put my own borders between my separate responses. xP


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Islamic content ratings, now? lol dude I prefer Natalie's first Baltimore vid bc I liked her cop costume and handcuff roleplay :33

Edit: the mod here has just deleted my exchange with a fellow sc member. Probably bc so many people are abusing the A-log rating. I had to trawl through KF archives for over an hour to figure out what that nonsense meant. Nope. Jack and I give zero fucks about what Null did 3 and 5 years ago thx. Not even sure what it was, just that people who don't like it are called A-loggers and Null has actually removed that rating from a number of threads here, bc people no longer know what it means and they frequently misuse the rating for just that reason.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Anyhoo... I almost didn't bother with this bc of the way your mod keeps cramming everything I write into one post that most people will just skim over bc of the tl;dr factor. But here's Natalie's original Baltimore vid. I think it's her best solo work so far.




I found the visuals better without the goofy filter and lolita shades. The pink bedroom light works for some of her topics (the fluff feminism and kinkster topics) but not this one. I liked her in bright light, moving around, for a hard hitting deconstruction like this one. She also draws out the presentation of the lead paint and blockbusting maps in the first vid. There's just a little more time for the audience to put it all together and draw their own conclusions that way. It feels less like a grandstanding white lady wringing her hands over somebody else's problem for views.

I don't get why she made the exact same vid with different lighting and her girlie voice sucking on beer tbh. I thought she was going to add something, flesh it out, throw some Foucauldian archaeology in there. All she did was change the lighting and cross more lines with her humour.

@ Lunarlandingwhatsis, ^ that's why I didn't like Natalie's second Baltimore vid. Not bc I'm a muslim or w/e you think lol


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Liking one vid less than another vid doesn't mean I'm joining your Kiwi lynch mob, btw.

I still want Natalie to have my e babies <3
 
Last edited:
lol so many autistic ratings on my lurv post. That shows what you people know. It's quite rare for that disorder to affect somebody with xx chromosomes.
It's meant to be an insult.

Like if I called you a shithead, I'd hope you're smart enough to realize that I'm not accusing you of literally having a head made of feces.
Why do mods cram multiple posts into one on this forum?

Dude, if I'd wanted all that in one post, I would have put it all in one post.

Those were replies to 3 separate people xP
Multiple posts in a row from the same person are wasteful. You should quote each person (or some subset of their post) and make it all in one post.

You can select text in someone's post and click "+ Quote", or do the same thing at the bottom of the post to quote the whole thing, and then hit "Insert Quotes..." when composing.
This video's pretty good, particularly the first parts.

It gets kind of weak near the end. Particularly when she brings up Trump and youtube celebrities, tries to chastise white people for not caring strongly enough, complains how the Freddie Gray case was handled (it was a difficult case to prosecute). It just turned into an aimless mishmash.

But the natty boh was a nice touch.

Edit: Lol, though I like the part where she says that kids eat paint chips as a regular thing. I always thought only mongs did that.
 
Last edited:
It's meant to be an insult.

Like if I called you a shithead, I'd hope you're smart enough to realize that I'm not accusing you of literally having a head made of feces.


Yeah, no shit.
It's called a snide rebuttal.
Flipping the statements of the retard who's tryinta be insulting around for the sake of underscoring their absurdity.
Sowwy if people here are too thick to read implied meanings. Maybe I'd have an easier time being understood if I just leave it at "HAHAHA U STUPID AND JELLY CUZ NATALIE SEXIER THAN U!"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

OMG LOL I'm not allowed to use the R word on this forum. You people are allowed to dox everybody whose personal info you can get your hands on, but the system automatically changes the R word to 'exceptional' lololol

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Well for all you *cough* exceptional individuals *cough* here is my alltime favourite Contrapoints video. Maybe you can learn something from my lady's :33 greatness



 
Last edited:
Yeah, no shit.
It's called a snide rebuttal.
Flipping the statements of the exceptional individual who's tryinta be insulting around for the sake of underscoring their absurdity.
Sowwy if people here are too thick to read implied meanings. Maybe I'd have an easier time being understood if I just leave it at "HAHAHA U STUPID AND JELLY CUZ NATALIE SEXIER THAN U!"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

OMG LOL I'm not allowed to use the R word on this forum. You people are allowed to dox everybody whose personal info you can get your hands on, but the system automatically changes the R word to 'exceptional' lololol

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Well for all you *cough* exceptional individuals *cough* here is my alltime favourite Contrapoints video. Maybe you can learn something from my lady's :33 greatness



Shut the fuck up.
 
So, apparently it's no longer enough simply to avoid misgendering. Now, even avoiding pronouns altogether in order to be accommodating is also unacceptable:
Background: a youtuber made a response video to Contra politely asking her to do a stream with him about current issues, and avoided using pronouns because he was unaware of what Contra identifies as (fair, since Contra still has videos up in which she identified as a cross-dresser, and if she's not going to put annotations up to correct this she can't really be surprised that some people don't know that she now identifies as trans).

However, even this is no longer enough, and Theryn Meyer quickly berated him for the crime of not using Contra's pronouns... despite the fact that SJ advocates have been encouraging people to not assume people's gender for years now and he was actually following that rule. Contra herself joined in later.

Makes Contra's video denying the left's opposition to free speech/thought even more disingenuous in hindsight. If even people who try to be accommodating and avoid using pronouns as to not offend are now free to attack, then I can't see how they even have room to deny the accusation of thought policing anymore.
 
Back