- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
Donny deserves any and all praise he gets.
Samuel on the other hand, deserves to lose everything.
Samuel on the other hand, deserves to lose everything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They sure use the same lingo. Maybe Vordy is part of a hivemind?
Way back when, I joined a facebook group called "#gamergate & #notyourshield". It was to follow Ralph throughout his autistic spergout a few years ago and never bothered to leave the group.
Well guess who started posting there.
View attachment 391993
> That awkward moment where even the most Autistic speds of GG doubt you
"TL;DR - She is not very nice." for random.txt @NullWay back when, I joined a facebook group called "#gamergate & #notyourshield". It was to follow Ralph throughout his autistic spergout a few years ago and never bothered to leave the group.
Well guess who started posting there.
View attachment 391993
> That awkward moment where even the most Autistic speds of GG doubt you
I've monitored that group for a few years, and so much autistic shit has gone down.
Way back when there was a female owner of the page. I can't remember her name, but she did a stream with Ralph over why she was passing ownership to someone else. The ownership went to a tranny called Tara, and all was good for a while.
Suddenly people were getting deleted for no reason, the group went down in flames and everyone was making threads on KiA (http://archive.is/Fbnvz). TL;DR a spliter group called GG ultras run by a mentally unstable neo-nazi exceptional individual started screenshotting shit on that group and being a massive edgelord. Tara couldn't handle it, and nuked the group.
After an autistic campaign on KiA a new group was made that didn't involve trannys who can't do their job.
Edit: Original owner was Queeny Martha: https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Queeny_Martha
I'm sure advocating for eugenics against Mrs. Reeves would be good evidence for harassment.
Seriously, what does he expect the UK government to do about a website hosted in another country, run by a citizen of that country? He does realize UK law doesn't apply to the US right?
The UK is an airstrip that thinks it's the 51st state of the USA, so his confusion is understandable.Given the disparity between his CV and conduct, Vordrak has really made me question the state of legal education in the UK.
I do as well. I don't think he really understands how powerful the First Amendment is. There was some extremist anti-abortion group that posted pictures of abortion providers in the form of wanted posters. Some lone wolf crazy killed a person on that list, and the state tried to prosecute them as well as the shooter. @AnOminous can correct me, but I think it was thrown out on First Amendment grounds, and it went all the way up to SCOTUS and they ruled it was protected free speech. So if that's covered, making fun of morons is probably safe as well.Given the disparity between his CV and conduct, Vordrak has really made me question the state of legal education in the UK.
I do as well. I don't think he really understands how powerful the First Amendment is. There was some extremist anti-abortion group that posted pictures of abortion providers in the form of wanted posters. Some lone wolf crazy killed a person on that list, and the state tried to prosecute them as well as the shooter. @AnOminous can correct me, but I think it was thrown out on First Amendment grounds, and it went all the way up to SCOTUS and they ruled it was protected free speech. So if that's covered, making fun of morons is probably safe as well.
I do as well. I don't think he really understands how powerful the First Amendment is. There was some extremist anti-abortion group that posted pictures of abortion providers in the form of wanted posters. Some lone wolf crazy killed a person on that list, and the state tried to prosecute them as well as the shooter. @AnOminous can correct me, but I think it was thrown out on First Amendment grounds, and it went all the way up to SCOTUS and they ruled it was protected free speech. So if that's covered, making fun of morons is probably safe as well.
I do as well. I don't think he really understands how powerful the First Amendment is. There was some extremist anti-abortion group that posted pictures of abortion providers in the form of wanted posters. Some lone wolf crazy killed a person on that list, and the state tried to prosecute them as well as the shooter. @AnOminous can correct me, but I think it was thrown out on First Amendment grounds, and it went all the way up to SCOTUS and they ruled it was protected free speech. So if that's covered, making fun of morons is probably safe as well.