DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
To people whining about "the proof of the escort was bad so this can't be trusted either" are making bad comparisons. No one ever proved DSP was sending messages to or receiving them from someone in the escort saga, not even neger. People have proved DSP was sending and receiving messages from someone here. It's not even apples to oranges. It's apples to this thing someone claims is edible who hasn't actually eaten it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Long time lurker, rizlajizzla, Sir Yarnsalot and 3 others
Israfel36 said:
So... I'm a DSP peep because I want proof that isn't blurred out with a meme covering it almost the entire video. Gotcha. Cause the escort proof worked out rrreeal well didn't it? I'm skeptical and that kinda shit doesn't help. I couldn't give two fucks what happens to good ol' Dave.

Tell me how this logic works: it's easier to just post a video of the profile clicking to the messages them in full but instead that mess was made. What does this person have to lose? DSP is already denying it and if it's true, then this anonymous source is now dead to him. So what the hell is the point at staying anonymous?
Click to expand...

Bro, do you even know how mad Phil is going to be with you when he finds out you've been on this site?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MidUSA, kamekmagik, rizlajizzla and 3 others
If @neger psykolog (or the mystery fan) decided that this was gonna be their huge long con surprise gotcha, then they would be laughed off the internet for some of the most autistic shit I've seen in a while. No one even nearing a rational human being would go through so much fabrication to ruin their reputation for what? confirmation of behavior we already pretty much knew about? I don't think so.

The whole reason the escort shit was so enrapturing was due to the potential bombshell it posed for being so far out of left field. So unless either of the two start proposing anything wacky like that is true with suspicious evidence, it should be fine to take at face value.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Done, Wurstbrot and PoopMagnet
SoapQueen1 said:
To people whining about "the proof of the escort was bad so this can't be trusted either" are making bad comparisons. No one ever proved DSP was sending messages to or receiving them from someone in the escort saga, not even neger. People have proved DSP was sending and receiving messages from someone here. It's not even apples to oranges. It's apples to this thing someone claims is edible who hasn't actually eaten it.
Click to expand...
Well strictly speaking, earlier we had a mystery woman now there is a mystery man. They are both perceived DSP scandals. And it's @neger psykolog verifying it. But it would be mindbogglingly insane to pull of a stunt like faking that. It's obviously more important who the person is. Then what the person is saying. Whatever the case might be. I am far to invested in this now.

And this is how i feel about this situation.
https://youtu.be/bkA_HD_m6H4
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: SpicyTit, PedoPhil, Windows 98 and 3 others
SoapQueen1 said:
To people whining about "the proof of the escort was bad so this can't be trusted either" are making bad comparisons. No one ever proved DSP was sending messages to or receiving them from someone in the escort saga, not even neger. People have proved DSP was sending and receiving messages from someone here. It's not even apples to oranges. It's apples to this thing someone claims is edible who hasn't actually eaten it.
Click to expand...

Not to mention that these were career scammers who sunk years into multiple aliases all in the name of scamming people. It’s like getting hustled from a professional card or pool shark.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: rizlajizzla
BSV said:
Well strictly speaking, earlier we had a mystery woman now there is a mystery man. They are both perceived DSP scandals. And it's @neger psykolog verifying it. But it would be mindbogglingly insane to pull of a stunt like faking that. It's obviously more important who the person is. Then what the person is saying. Whatever the case might be. I am far to invested in this now.

And this is how i feel about this situation.
https://youtu.be/bkA_HD_m6H4
Click to expand...

Null and neger verified that the person controlling those accounts was the person making the accusation, which was 100% True and Authentic, as we all ended up seeing that person use those accounts for sperging. It can't be helped if everyone went DEFCON 1 autistic over it all.

EDIT: They both stated they couldn't verify the actual accusations.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Long time lurker
Waveysauce said:
Damn i will lose a part of myself if snort burnell ends up being taken down.....

I dont even know if Phil was aware of the channel until a super a-log was posting IRS forms already filled out for people in the comment section to go and just type in a few things and contact the IRS (which may have worked this was a bit ago). and then the people who would super spam the memes in his chat is how he was made aware...... he is full of shit tho when comes to other channels he is aware of tevin argent etc, claims to not know much about any


@neger psykolog just curious cause some parts of the pics are cut off for me.... what was the date where phil sent those?

edit- nvm I see them now
Click to expand...

Someone has been trying to take down Snort Burnell's channel for at least the past eight months. That's why she was uploading videos to a backup channel until that channel also got strikes against it. I suspect she's prepared to re-upload her content if Phil and/or his cronies have their way.

The most recent example I'm aware of an attack against Snort's channel happened in early February: One of the videos on the second sponsorship (I think it was called "the new sponsorship") was temporarily taken down due to bullying and harassment.

Now, the dates on the DMs are from late January to early February. But is that of this year? If that's the case, then it would be reasonable to say Phil himself reported Snort's channel or encouraged his fans to do so. It could even be argued they had a modicum of success in doing so because of the sponsorship video being taken down.

I use the plural "fans" for a reason, and that's what makes these DMs so interesting: It's very likely that Neger's anonymous source wasn't the only person Phil asked to check out these videos for possible slander.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: adderall, Done, rizlajizzla and 4 others
Cherie Bomb said:
Someone has been trying to take down Snort Burnell's channel for at least the past eight months. That's why she was uploading videos to a backup channel until that channel also got strikes against it. I suspect she's prepared to re-upload her content if Phil and/or his cronies have their way.

The most recent example I'm aware of an attack against Snort's channel happened in early February: One of the videos on the second sponsorship (I think it was called "the new sponsorship") was temporarily taken down due to bullying and harassment.

Now, the dates on the DMs are from late January to early February. But is that of this year? If that's the case, then it would be reasonable to say Phil himself reported Snort's channel or encouraged his fans to do so. It could even be argued they had a modicum of success in doing so because of the sponsorship video being taken down.

I use the plural "fans" for a reason, and that's what makes these DMs so interesting: It's very likely that Neger's anonymous source wasn't the only person Phil asked to check out these videos for possible slander.
Click to expand...


Whoa whoa whoa. Hold up here a second!

Snort is a girl?

I did not see that coming.

Okay carry on.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: PedoPhil, kamekmagik, Dirt McGirt and 3 others
There is a chasm of difference between verifying that someone has access to an escorts Twitter account to personally going into someone's account and clicking on a Twitter link in a private message to verify Phil sent the message.

. . . I can appreciate folks not wanting to get burned but the scale isn't even the same. The only one who looks like a fool for fabricating any of this is NP himself.
 
I just want to say fuck you to whoever suggested four non-blondes and to neger for putting it in there because now I have that shitty fucking song stuck in my head.

BallBuster said:
Whoa whoa whoa. Hold up here a second!

Snort is a girl?

I did not see that coming.

Okay carry on.
Click to expand...

People have been saying Snort Burnell is Ardnas (who is a girl) for a while, but I don't know where that comes from.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Windows 98
BSV said:
Well strictly speaking, earlier we had a mystery woman now there is a mystery man. They are both perceived DSP scandals. And it's @neger psykolog verifying it. But it would be mindbogglingly insane to pull of a stunt like faking that. It's obviously more important who the person is. Then what the person is saying. Whatever the case might be. I am far to invested in this now.

And this is how i feel about this situation.
https://youtu.be/bkA_HD_m6H4
Click to expand...

In the escort saga neger and others verified the Twitter account and website profile were being controlled by the same person. They did not confirm any alleged escort had contact with DSP.

In this mini saga neger verified a Twitter account actually had back and forth messages to and from DSP.

Don't condense this down to "oh well it's the same situation because the sender is anonymous." It's not the same at all. That was literally the point of my post.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: adderall, Sven, Long time lurker and 6 others
I put some trust in MW and got let down. I can't say I truly learn my lesson but I do have faith in NP at least. IF this is somehow a farce they, at least, better not be another damn A-loggy 90's wannabe hacker bird porn pirate ex-fan or sum shit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back