Disaster Active Shooter at Youtube HQ

Status
Not open for further replies.
Confirmed reports of an Active Shooter at YT HQ in San Bruno (outside of San Francisco California).

SUMMARY:
Shots first reported on Twitter around 12:57PM PST via Vadim Lavrusk @Lavrusik who is now confirmed he has been evacuated.
Large police presence in the area.
Reports of a FEMALE shooter.
4-5 Victims transported to hospital at 3:30 PM PST

upload_2018-4-3_16-13-43.png


upload_2018-4-3_16-15-6.png


upload_2018-4-3_16-26-1.png


San Bruno police now reporting to clear the area.
upload_2018-4-3_16-20-30.png


upload_2018-4-3_16-42-38.png


Source:
http://www.ktvu.com/news/active-shooter-situation-at-youtube-headquarters
https://gizmodo.com/possible-active-shooter-reported-at-youtubes-san-bruno-1824294859
 
Last edited:
I am kind of hoping that this couple has a long history of domestic abuse with each other. Maybe even the dude having a restraining order against the girl. Can you imagine the absolute shit storm when the women learn she was abusing HIM and not her finally having enough of his shit and killing him? Some of these gals seem to think women physically can't abuse men, and if this is a case of HER abusing HIM? Oh lawd you, the ladies will be quick to try and bury or make excuses for her actions.
 
View attachment 417940
Youtube
School
No correlation.
I think he was being sarcastic with the right wingers pushing to arm everyone and their pets.

In the other hand.. oh wow.. not a single dead.

Remember when people coped with their emotions in ways that didn't involve gunning people down?
Pretty sure every century, people as its own ways of coping.. from lynching, to good ol' Roman beating.

She killed l i t e r a l l y no one except for herself and only wounded 3 others. This is proof that women are inferior spree shooters. Leave the heavy lifting to the fellas, ladies.

tumblr_og6itwUxgD1vjv3tvo1_500.png


Depends on your point of view I guess.

On one side, the strong gun laws in cali didn't allow this person to get a faster more powerful weapon.

On the other hand, this person could have had second thoughts or just weak/awful aiming and thus could barely pull an hero.


Woman goes on mass killing spree, only kills herself. And women still think they deserve equal rights?

Obviously inequality is the problem, she needed bigger guns and laws to put men lined up on the floor for easier killings!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
came to the last page to find info on the shooter, how many people died, and new articles.

instead found a lively and well-informed debate on gun legislature in the 21st century by policy experts. great job reddit!

might be a bit late but seems the shooter was a woman going to confront her ex bf?

http://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/possible-active-shooter-at-youtube-in-san-bruno/1098585330
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5575105/Active-shooter-reported-YouTube-HQ-California.html
https://www.rt.com/usa/423108-shooting-youtube-hq-california/
 
To get us out of the pointless arguing...

Shooter has been identified as Nasim Aghdam. Some facts about her. (archive) Also an NBC Bay Area article which identifies her as the shooter, which I can't archive because Archive.is chokes on it. Apparently, she was a PETA supporter (archive), just to put the cherry on top of this shit sundae.

>PETA supporter

Well, you could read the writing on the wall, in bold fucking comic sans. :story:

Also the autism in this thread is a treasure of its own.
 
T
To get us out of the pointless arguing...

Shooter has been identified as Nasim Aghdam. Some facts about her. (archive) Also an NBC Bay Area article which identifies her as the shooter, which I can't archive because Archive.is chokes on it. Apparently, she was a PETA supporter (archive), just to put the cherry on top of this shit sundae.
These aren't facts about her just details on the shooting itself.

Except for the part where she had a bunch of uploaded videos bitching about YouTube. Maybe there's some credence to the demonetization theory.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back