TGWTG "Nostalgia Critic" / Doug Walker, Rob Walker, Mike Michaud, Mike Ellis, Holly Christine Brown, et al - The Incompetent Predator-Protecting Upper Management of Channel Awesome, Doug Still Not That Funny

There's a noticeable distinction between preying on a nearly grown college-aged woman with the means to properly tell CA fuckheads where to shove it and the same CA fuckheads abusing literal elementary school children.

As listed earlier in the conversational thread, it's still creepy and I don't condone it, but there's a pretty big difference in severity between the two.

What you still got here is grown men with some authority and fame, no matter how pathetically limited it is, preying on teen girls 10+ years their junior taking advantage of the implicit trust fans tend to have in those they admire. That they are "nearly college aged" doesn't mean they aren't still teens and aren't still kids.

It sounds like Kuriboh may not have preyed on these girls but he sure as hell helped Psyguy do it.
 
It sounds like he set her up with Pysguy and then "ran off" once it got out of control. If that's true then that still would make him just as guilty for meeting up with her.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UnKillFill
Thank you! Where I live it's 17.

Either way, yeah, still nasty with the power imbalance, and still disgusting. Makes me wonder why CA covered it up, when the Critic seems to be very vocal about being against abuse, at least in reviews.
CA might have ignored it to try and save face, because you know, not addressing the issue helps
 
Doug always pays lip service to "humane" issues, or even just addressing SJW discourse in his videos. He'll talk the talk, but won't put money where his mouth is. I know for a while tumblrettes loved him for seemingly being "pro minorities and women starring in action films!".
 
Yeah it'd be kinda fucked if LK was the abuser, from what I've seen of him at cons (that he attended with his wife an Kirbopher) he looked like a friendly dude. But I do also remember, in one of his "LP" videos, he had recorded his then-fiance's drunken rambling about how they used to do depraved shit, and how he was basically a nympho? For the life of me I don't remember the video, and since his channels were routinely deleted I have no clue if they were archived.
 
Yeah it'd be kinda fucked if LK was the abuser, from what I've seen of him at cons (that he attended with his wife an Kirbopher) he looked like a friendly dude. But I do also remember, in one of his "LP" videos, he had recorded his then-fiance's drunken rambling about how they used to do depraved shit, and how he was basically a nympho? For the life of me I don't remember the video, and since his channels were routinely deleted I have no clue if they were archived.

I remember that. Apparently LittleKuriboh's parents burned him something fierce because he's bisexual and he had a phase in his life where he would sleep around to validate his sexuality or something like that.

It's pretty fucked up but it's not something you would know just from his behavior.
 
It should be noted that the person who gave their testimony in the Google document states that they were 18 at the time of the incident, but felt that they had a much younger state of mind due to emotional issues. So it's possible that whoever this producer is wasn't doing anything technically illegal, but was definitely engaging in scummy, predatory behavior.
 
Yeah it'd be kinda fucked if LK was the abuser, from what I've seen of him at cons (that he attended with his wife an Kirbopher) he looked like a friendly dude. But I do also remember, in one of his "LP" videos, he had recorded his then-fiance's drunken rambling about how they used to do depraved shit, and how he was basically a nympho? For the life of me I don't remember the video, and since his channels were routinely deleted I have no clue if they were archived.

Please tell me I'm not the only one who mistook "LK" for @LordKaT. (:_(

At least, should Jane's words be true, he (@LordKaT) has an alibi of his own, though—he wasn't fired; he left on his own accord.
 
Please tell me I'm not the only one who mistook "LK" for @LordKaT. (:_(

At least, should Jane's words be true, he (@LordKaT) has an alibi of his own, though—he wasn't fired; he left on his own accord.

I want to quote this post:

We discussed this heavily on page 32 and 33. Here's what we know so far:
  • Male
  • Was a producer
  • Was eventually fired by CA, so he doesn't work there anymore
  • Had to work there for over a year given what the anonymous account told us
  • Was considered a "prominent producer" in everyone's eyes, though that's extremely subjective

Am I male? Yes.
Was I a producer? Yes.
Was I fired? No, I left.
Worked with CA for over a year? Kinda. UWW didn't last longer than a year.
Considered a "prominent producer"? LOL fuck no.

Seriously, though, I'm keeping my nose out of this shit stew. If what everyone is accusing everyone else of is true then the police need to be involved and I don't want to ruin any potential investigation by being a shitty shock jock.
 
Seriously, though, I'm keeping my nose out of this shit stew. If what everyone is accusing everyone else of is true then the police need to be involved and I don't want to ruin any potential investigation by being a shitty shock jock.

Seems to me like the smart thing to do.

And I'm sorry if you thought I dragged you into something you had no place being in. I just wanted to say that whoever this predator described by an anon was, it couldn't have been you.
 
Am I missing something here, boys and girls?

I don't get it. If someone's an actual predator, then why are they playing these asinine guessing games and giving vague allusions to the culprit instead of just bloody well outing the fucker? There's a coyness to this that reeks of either lack of evidence or the deliberate withholding of information to cause more drama. Either way, it's weird to me.

If there's a legit reason they can't just come out with a name, I'd like to hear it!
 
I want to quote this post:



Am I male? Yes.
Was I a producer? Yes.
Was I fired? No, I left.
Worked with CA for over a year? Kinda. UWW didn't last longer than a year.
Considered a "prominent producer"? LOL fuck no.

Seriously, though, I'm keeping my nose out of this shit stew. If what everyone is accusing everyone else of is true then the police need to be involved and I don't want to ruin any potential investigation by being a shitty shock jock.
You have to hide under the table from the cops.

I'll keep you here in my house.
 
Slight :powerlevel:: All I can really do now is look back at my ween 12-13 year old self and think : shit dude stop watching ! These guys are complete wackos, do something more productive with your life ! They aren’t worth your time ( with the exception of Brad, Lordkat, ChadRoco) . Shit man, it kinda really depresses me on how fucked up the big picture is
 
I think the key thing most people keep forgetting in trying to suss out this pedo is that they were fired.

My guesses are Aussie and Dan Olson. Dan is just a creep, we all know that. But when Aussie was fired, their excuse was "some issues, ill advised actions, and other various events". Lindsay implied he was spreading rumours that she was sleeping with him, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was up to more. http://namebrandlindsay.com/2011/04/27/my-week-in-neverland-or-how-to-avoid-a-bj-from-lindsay/

I wanted to say Andrew Dickman was the one, but he left on his own. He is a huge fucking creep, in any case.

I have nothing better to do, so here is the list of male producers who were fired:
  • Mike Ellis (not a producer but a huge creep so he is on the list)
  • Bhargav
  • ThatAussieGuy (Daniel Rizzo)
  • TheSpoonyOne (Noah Antwiler)
  • Foldable Ideas (Dan Olson)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Am I missing something here, boys and girls?

I don't get it. If someone's an actual predator, then why are they playing these asinine guessing games and giving vague allusions to the culprit instead of just bloody well outing the fucker? There's a coyness to this that reeks of either lack of evidence or the deliberate withholding of information to cause more drama. Either way, it's weird to me.

If there's a legit reason they can't just come out with a name, I'd like to hear it!
The SA thread on internet critics (which is full of people who really fucking hate LordKat and couldn't even talk about the recent Down the Rabbit Hole video on Spoony without it devolving into a hate-jerk on Jason, including Dan Olson bringing up the Magfest incident) said something today about not naming the predator because of how society treats accusers and how her name will be dragged through the mud. The forum mod (LorneKates or something, Phelous's web designer) is also very insistent about people not trying to find out who the predator is.

Which is really weak IMO since thanks to #MeToo, no one's gonna say shit about assault accusers, especially if the predator went after people under the age of consent.
 
Well I just sat through his fresh off the production line Woody Woodpecker review to check for any sign of the drama getting to him and what i saw was nothing less than 18 minutes of panicked screeching, painfully failed attempts at running jokes, desperate levels of cringe and migrane inducing depths of sheer unfunny cancer.

...so no. thus far it doesnt seem to be affecting his work in the slightest at the moment.

honestly it wouldnt surprise me if doug is just so fucking apathetic and resigned to being the screaming tard of internet reviews that he just doesnt give a shit if the site burns down and all his old colleagues despise him.
 
Back