G
GV 002
Guest
kiwifarms.net
The SA thread on internet critics (which is full of people who really fucking hate LordKat and couldn't even talk about the recent Down the Rabbit Hole video on Spoony without it devolving into a hate-jerk on Jason, including Dan Olson bringing up the Magfest incident) said something today about not naming the predator because of how society treats accusers and how her name will be dragged through the mud. The forum mod (LorneKates or something, Phelous's web designer) is also very insistent about people not trying to find out who the predator is.
Which is really weak IMO since thanks to #MeToo, no one's gonna say shit about assault accusers, especially if the predator went after people under the age of consent.
So it's pure drama whoring then.
If they don't want to name the nonce, if they want to stay anonymous themselves, and if they don't want anyone else trying to figure out who he is, then why the actual fuck has this silly bint even said anything? They've even left a string of fucking Scooby Doo style clues for everyone to sperg over. It's pure, unadulterated drama whoring from silly little girls who just want everyone to give the big stupid creepy men even more of a hard time. Frankly, they're all twats.
Name him or don't, if there's evidence to back it up, then I can't see why she'd fear for her name. I mean, it's Channel Awesome, not the bloody BBC. What's the worst that can happen, a few autists call you a liar on Twitter? So what? If this case is genuine, then this girly needs to untie those twisted knickers, stop being a dramamonger and deal with it the right way.
Honestly, it's people like this that make these sexual abuse/assault/harassment cases so easily dismissed. Irritates the hell out of me.