TGWTG "Nostalgia Critic" / Doug Walker, Rob Walker, Mike Michaud, Mike Ellis, Holly Christine Brown, et al - The Incompetent Predator-Protecting Upper Management of Channel Awesome, Doug Still Not That Funny

The SA thread on internet critics (which is full of people who really fucking hate LordKat and couldn't even talk about the recent Down the Rabbit Hole video on Spoony without it devolving into a hate-jerk on Jason, including Dan Olson bringing up the Magfest incident) said something today about not naming the predator because of how society treats accusers and how her name will be dragged through the mud. The forum mod (LorneKates or something, Phelous's web designer) is also very insistent about people not trying to find out who the predator is.

Which is really weak IMO since thanks to #MeToo, no one's gonna say shit about assault accusers, especially if the predator went after people under the age of consent.

So it's pure drama whoring then.

If they don't want to name the nonce, if they want to stay anonymous themselves, and if they don't want anyone else trying to figure out who he is, then why the actual fuck has this silly bint even said anything? They've even left a string of fucking Scooby Doo style clues for everyone to sperg over. It's pure, unadulterated drama whoring from silly little girls who just want everyone to give the big stupid creepy men even more of a hard time. Frankly, they're all twats.

Name him or don't, if there's evidence to back it up, then I can't see why she'd fear for her name. I mean, it's Channel Awesome, not the bloody BBC. What's the worst that can happen, a few autists call you a liar on Twitter? So what? If this case is genuine, then this girly needs to untie those twisted knickers, stop being a dramamonger and deal with it the right way.

Honestly, it's people like this that make these sexual abuse/assault/harassment cases so easily dismissed. Irritates the hell out of me.
 
SHOTS FIRED

TGWTG.jpg
 

Taking it with a grain of salt and all that, but I find it interesting they just dump this obscure lone post and then fuck off without further explanation. There's also a few people missing from the list like Suede and Sage, so maybe the person never got to know them like they did with the others (so maybe the person was involved during the two years Suede was gone, and I don't know when Sage joined). The part of Nash is pretty lulzy given how he acts on Twitter, though, but maybe he's different in person.

What's SadPanda up to, anyway? Of all the producers, he comes off as someone who stays under the radar, and perhaps knows of some things.
 
Am I missing something here, boys and girls?

I don't get it. If someone's an actual predator, then why are they playing these asinine guessing games and giving vague allusions to the culprit instead of just bloody well outing the fucker? There's a coyness to this that reeks of either lack of evidence or the deliberate withholding of information to cause more drama. Either way, it's weird to me.

If there's a legit reason they can't just come out with a name, I'd like to hear it!

My guess would be that they didn't release the persons name due to legal reasons.
 
Well I just sat through his fresh off the production line Woody Woodpecker review to check for any sign of the drama getting to him and what i saw was nothing less than 18 minutes of panicked screeching, painfully failed attempts at running jokes, desperate levels of cringe and migrane inducing depths of sheer unfunny cancer.

...so no. thus far it doesnt seem to be affecting his work in the slightest at the moment.

honestly it wouldnt surprise me if doug is just so fucking apathetic and resigned to being the screaming tard of internet reviews that he just doesnt give a shit if the site burns down and all his old colleagues despise him.

Snoop Dougy Doug.jpg
 
the person who gave their testimony in the Google document states that they were 18 at the time of the incident, but felt that they had a much younger state of mind

That is the dumbest shit, you don't get to pick your age to push your victim status.

Either you are actually a down syndrome individual that the courts/psychologists have deemed to be a certain metal age "the mind of a 6yo" or you are just making shit up.
 
Well I just sat through his fresh off the production line Woody Woodpecker review to check for any sign of the drama getting to him and what i saw was nothing less than 18 minutes of panicked screeching, painfully failed attempts at running jokes, desperate levels of cringe and migrane inducing depths of sheer unfunny cancer.

...so no. thus far it doesnt seem to be affecting his work in the slightest at the moment.

honestly it wouldnt surprise me if doug is just so fucking apathetic and resigned to being the screaming tard of internet reviews that he just doesnt give a shit if the site burns down and all his old colleagues despise him.

Does Walker actually make any money from Channel Awesome itself? I thought that was pure Michaud. Walker just gets paid for ads on his videos. So his YouTube hits are still generating. The peasants are revolting, let them eat cake and such. Does any of this have a direct day to day impact on him! Beyond ego and reputation?
 
Back