Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

Given that they couldn't even get ToonKritic arrested, the chances of Jerry getting any comupance is thin. Granted, none of that will be because the law deems Jerry correct, fuck no. It'll just be another case of them not taking the internet seriously, which is both a blessing and a curse if we're being fair.


The defamation lawsuit would be his best bet thought because Jesus fuck does Josh have a case since Jerry can't put a fucking sock in it.
 
meanwhile on tumblr Peet/Orchard still doesn't understand that two years of constantly slandering and insulting someone in an effort to make them perceived as negatively possible by a group of people might be considered by some people to be abusive behaviour.
https://archive.fo/m0Z33
upload_2018-4-28_14-54-48.png


Edit.
https://archive.fo/87V7p
upload_2018-4-28_22-31-16.png


I'm always impressed with how consistent they can be saying things about other people that actually are more indicative of them self than the person they talk about.
 
Last edited:
Something something more rambling about Gaslighting.
upload_2018-4-29_23-19-43.png



more claims josh's fanbase are behvaving bad with out any actual evidence
upload_2018-4-29_23-24-48.png


And the main attraction, Openly admitting to trying to actively repell people from their audience.
upload_2018-4-29_23-21-15.png



archive links as the archive updates.
 
The projection emanating from Peet is practically strangling me through the screen. Have any of his fans ever watched a Josh Scorcher video, or any of the other people he's "run off"?
 
Catching up here since the Toonkritic thing went down.

How the fuck does Lily not realize that alleging that someone engaged in a cover up for a pedophile isn't grounds for a lawsuit? There's crying about ponies on the internet and then there's stating that someone willfully and deliberately aided illegal action that harmed children by concealing it from authorities.

Restraining orders also definitely exist in Canada, as do no-contact orders. Lily's been weaponizing her fanbase against him by spreading falsehoods, her story isn't going to hold up in court. And if she lives in the Atlantics then it's not terribly expensive to drag someone to court for being a fuckup.
 
Mostly silent on this subject (since I disagree with a lot of things said on this matter), but I'm chiming in on the cover-up thing because I've used that phrase here and there before Peet even started saying it, so this sort've post talks about me too by extension.

Josh had no intention to release the video call of the Toon confrontation. He claims they were going to coordinate and release statement videos on the matter (which he sure dragged ass on, since they had the evidence for at least two weeks (you'd figure that would've been a bit higher of a priority)). But coming forward and randomly accusing someone of pedophilia and just hope people take your word for it when you have what is more or less a confession is beyond stupid. At that point, I don't think you could blame someone for accusing him of attempting to cover up for a pedophile.

EDIT: I fucked up big time on the last sentence and encouraged covering up for a pedophile due to a typo. Fixed.
 
Last edited:
Mostly silent on this subject (since I disagree with a lot of things said on this matter), but I'm chiming in on the cover-up thing because I've used that phrase here and there before Peet even started saying it, so this sort've post talks about me too by extension.

Josh had no intention to release the video call of the Toon confrontation. He claims they were going to coordinate and release statement videos on the matter (which he sure dragged ass on, since they had the evidence for at least two weeks (you'd figure that would've been a bit higher of a priority)). But coming forward and randomly accusing someone of pedophilia and just hope people take your word for it when you have what is more or less a confession is beyond stupid. At that point, I don't think you could blame someone for accusing him of attempting to cover up for a pedophile.

EDIT: I fucked up big time on the last sentence and encouraged covering up for a pedophile due to a typo. Fixed.

"You know what always makes things better if you want to take them seriously? Letting the online chicken coup in on the allegations! Because they don't have a tendency of sperging out, taking things personally, and creating online shitshows that make situations look far less professional and thusly give people a right to not take these things seriously! That's just what this situation needs!"

Listen, for as fucked up as the Channel Awesome situation is, it's highly unlikely that the Walkers will come onto any legal trouble for it because of the large feather-dusting that came about online. Judge's and the law in general tends to not take the internet seriously because of the public online sphere. You can post anything and websites, viewers, and investors already have the power to moderate the Net in the best ways possible without having to resort to the law. Furthermore, when you're so quick to let the internet know about serious situations like this, they tend to do everything in the power to demand their own brand of autistic justice and go completely over the heads of anybody who would be looking at this from an outsiders perspective.

You made this shit public, obviously it isn't that big of a deal to you, nor should it be to the law, if you felt like it was such a necessity to let the random public know the same information that private investigators know. That kind of backwards ass priority is why lawsuits announced online seem like a joke, and it's also why I say continuously throughout the thread not to get your hopes up about Josh's lawsuit.

I understand that to most people, NOT going public about criminal information sounds like a bad idea, but the point is that if you already have a strong enough case by itself, then you don't need random people in the middle of it constantly mucking things up. Josh not telling anybody outside of the people involved while simultaneously attempting to get actual, lawful action against ToonKritic was the right thing to do. I don't care what the situation looks like to random fucking bystanders, they're not going to help the case to begin with anyways. And especially given the incredibly autistic reaction people like Xain and fucking even Jerry had when this whole thing hit the fan, I don't think anyone looking at this situation logically could ever say making the ToonKritic case a crusade would ever be a useful application of effort and time.
 
more claims josh's fanbase are behvaving bad with out any actual evidence
upload_2018-4-29_23-24-48-png.438376
deliberately conditioned them to do so

He... He does know that having a "rabid" fanbase only makes Josh look worse, right? And I'm positive that's the exact opposite of what anyone wants.

He does know that Josh has put out videos denouncing what Jerry would consider "mobbing", right? Where are Josh's mob rallies?

This is anything but "deliberate conditioning". But of course Jerry wouldn't mention such a small, minute detail.

Josh has told his fans not to mob others and berated people who do. Do we have any actual evidence for Jerry screaming at people in Discord? Any firsthand accounts? Because right now, we don't know if he's actually yelled at people in his Discord for what he thinks is raiding, or if it's just fluff talk to make him look better. There is evidence of Jerry telling his fans to false-flag videos. There is no evidence of Josh doing that. If Jerry points to irrefutable evidence of Josh conditioning his fans to be deranged and rabid, and mob and raid, then I will drop everything I'm doing and make a thread on Josh.

What does Jerry consider to be "deliberate conditioning", though? Making videos about other people, telling them that they're dumb? Because Josh has only done that 4 times (for three people, since Jerry is counted twice), while Jerry relishes in talking shit about people. Jerry's being a hypocrite again, but since he's the one being accused, then it's really no big deal, since it's not a bad thing, according to him.

I'm not saying that Josh's fans aren't deranged and rabid and tend to mob and do autistic shit (I believe I've said that earlier in the thread, and I have to retract that), but none of that is Josh's fault or doing. All he does is do the response videos (and as I said, he’s only ever done 4). It's the same shit with the Skeptic™ crowd, that they don't openly encourage raiding, but it happens anyway. And Jerry is so autistic and so fucking simple-minded that he puts the blame on the content creators themselves. But when his fans do it, it's justified!

So to sum it all up, I don't get it. Jerry says Josh is an asshole for not keeping his fanbase in check, and when he tries to by using Jerry's own tactics, Jerry uses that to incriminate him.

How do none of his fans see this?
In addition, all this shit is right here in front of you, Josh.
 
Last edited:
How do none of his fans see this?
I know it sounds like hyperbole, and comes off as :autism: as hell, but to the best of my knowledge the only real answer I can come up with is some level of cult thinking and mentality is put into play regarding all of Peet/Orchards fans. Through out several videos they've established a set of villainous individuals who are never to be trusted (Josh, Brittany, Us) and a group of peple who can be trusted (Theirself, Lizzy, Xain, Patch.) The mentality has been enforced more than enough through various blogposts on tumblr and in youtube videos. I'm not going to say it is a cult, but it reads like a lot of things I've read into about cults on a certain level.

Tinfoil hat I know, but thats the best answer to how "it's photoshopped" can go so far with so many people

Edit: just wanted to add an extra bit of clarficiation. I can't even really be sure Peet/Orchard is aware that what there doing falls in line with these kind of tactics, only that it does match up with things I have read about cults.
 
Last edited:
I know it sounds like hyperbole, and comes off as :autism: as hell, but to the best of my knowledge the only real answer I can come up with is some level of cult thinking and mentality is put into play regarding all of Peet/Orchards fans. Through out several videos they've established a set of villainous individuals who are never to be trusted (Josh, Brittany, Us) and a group of peple who can be trusted (Theirself, Lizzy, Xain, Patch.) The mentality has been enforced more than enough through various blogposts on tumblr and in youtube videos. I'm not going to say it is a cult, but it reads like a lot of things I've read into about cults on a certain level.

Tinfoil hat I know, but thats the best answer to how "it's photoshopped" can go so far with so many people
It has to catch up with them somehow.

“Why is Josh a bad person?”
“Because he humiliated one of his fans once in his discord!”
“How do you know that?”
“Lily shared a screenshot of a Skype chat!”
“Why is Lily a good person?”
“Because she prevents mob mentality by screaming at her fans on discord!”
“What about all the criticism she gets?”
“Well you can never trust screenshots, they can be doctored!”

Pwning Jerry fans should become a new genre on YouTube. lol
 
Pwning Jerry fans should become a new genre on YouTube. lol
I'm not sure it counts if they don't realize they've been "pwnt", it'd be like calling the town retard a retard and them either going into an aloha snackbar bitchfit or grinning ear to ear responding with "DAS WAT MAH MAMA CALLS ME :D ".

I just don't understand how they retain this many sycophants when Peet keeps shitting on them day in and day out. Hell, do the ones he's publicly humiliated for the temerity of offering to help react like a beaten dog, whimpering and still thinking him a god, or do they wise up?

The whole thing is just incredibly frustrating to watch from afar, like a disaster movie filled with clueless idiots.
 
I thought those DnD videos were on Dr. Wolf's channel so...why is Josh the one being harassed again?

Also I have no idea how Jerry thinks he is going to have his way in a court of law. We have youtube videos of people obsessing over rapists, serial killers, mass shooters etc and nobody has made a move to remove those videos. How is it at all justified that some videos of DnD be removed just because one guy sexually role played with, yet never physically touched a minor is in it.
 
Last edited:
more claims josh's fanbase are behvaving bad with out any actual evidence
View attachment 438376
Actually, if I may, what Anon said actually happened.

https://archive.is/5xf8t
https://thunderspark91.tumblr.com/post/173446176598/seriously-now-this-is-just-pathetic

Thunderspark has been A-logging, and yelled at others because they criticized their A-logging, including Brittany and E4B, who this very topic considers to be A-Logs. That said, it finally stuck, and they removed the list of followers, but the damage was done and the cause was harmed.

So, yeah. Actions have consequences. Especially if it means a terrible person can prove you're terrible as well because of the stupid behavior of an idiot.
 
Actually, if I may, what Anon said actually happened.

https://archive.is/5xf8t
https://thunderspark91.tumblr.com/post/173446176598/seriously-now-this-is-just-pathetic

Thunderspark has been A-logging, and yelled at others because they criticized their A-logging, including Brittany and E4B, who this very topic considers to be A-Logs. That said, it finally stuck, and they removed the list of followers, but the damage was done and the cause was harmed.

So, yeah. Actions have consequences. Especially if it means a terrible person can prove you're terrible as well because of the stupid behavior of an idiot.
Fans being fans, spectators trying to be heroes. Unless Josh is telling his fans or people “allied” with him to harass Jerry, then it’s not his fault.

At this point I don’t think anyone would (or should) deny that the spectators here tend to be cringy a-logs, but they aren’t “conditioned” to be like that. Honestly, and this is a theory based on personal experience, they seem to have the same problem Jerry has - delusions of grandeur. People like this thunderspark dude or ephromjosine think they’re making a difference by calling out the “big heads” while it actually comes off as autistic screeching.

On a semi-related note, for someone who mocks the concept of pacifism, Jerry seems to be obsessed with making his fans pacifists, when he’s not telling them to false flag.
:thinking::thinking:
 
Just something I thought interesting (forgive me if it doesn't work it's around 1:01:07 in the hooktube video)
https://streamable.com/yjogx
Little piece of FNGR's stream on Josh Vs Jerry (so I guess that fits here then?). Vida thinks we have a full-on hate boner for Jerry that we ignore everything about Josh because we downvoted his post earlier today.

Ain't true brah, it's just that Josh has done a whole lot better things that make him instantly better than Jerry. Josh ain't without faults but he can atleast own up to them. And you're basically a sperg that has done everything to fuck it up. Patience is a virtue, especially for things like these.

PS. Here's the hooktube for the video if anyone is interested https://hooktube.com/watch?v=J0KuJCNM_T8
 
that we ignore everything about Josh

Erm

Todays events have made me change my stance on Josh and it's probably going to upset some people. Fuck 'em.

Joshua Burner is a spineless cuck

...
Joshua Burner will remain a spineless cuck.

Joshua Burner remains a spineless cuck

If this keep going then you'll be the spineless cuck that you're making yourself look like.

Call him a spineless cuck in pink text- it's the same overall message but its funnier :^)

Mfi Peet gets away unscathed AGAIN because Josh is too spineless to end his career for good

If Josh wasn't a spineless cuck I'd dare say it was an intentional move on his end (and a brilliant one, at that)

Don't forget that Josh is a spineless cuck so this won't even amount to anything. Chris has made more intimidating demands.

In any case, Josh's fuck-ups and screw-ups tend to be irrelevant to the things Jerry says about him nowadays.
"He's conditioning his fans to mob!"
Nope.
"He's an alt-right mouthpiece!"
Wrong.
"He's a terrible person for berating a fan of his in his discord server!"
Out of context, yeah that's obviously bad, but Jerry claims to do the same exact thing.

I'll leave addressing his actions during the Toonkritic saga to the people who were more involved with it.
 
Love the cognitive dissonance of me saying "Hey, going public with something you want to take to court is fucking stupid, don't do that" is worked around into being "They just really fucking hate Peet".

Listen faggot, most of here have no horses in these races. We're here because it's fun. I don't know if you visit enough of the Farms to know this, so let me explain it to you very carefully just in case.

A vast majority of the lolcows on this website are only on here because they seriously thought that putting as much personal information out in a public space was a good idea for whatever reason. Shit like that is why people like MovieBob, Zoe Quinn, Brianna Wu, and Andrew Dobson are still some of our biggest threads that are still frequently updated. People like them think the smart way to shut us down is to express all of their offline shit all the damn time, not realizing just how much easier that makes it for us to mock them.

Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu took their fucking cases to the UN and Google and all it did was shine a spotlight on how fucking shitty they are. You just don't do stuff like that so openly and then bitch when the negative attention catches up to you.

I'm not applauding Josh for having common sense. I'm explaining to you that if you want to seriously investigate or report somebody to legitimate authorities, getting the online police involved is probably not going to do anything besides hinder you.

Numerous times on this thread have people been challenged to come up with incriminating details regarding Josh. @1911JD himself has offered to make a thread in the event that this happens. And not only has it not happened, the handful of times people have had things to say about Josh have been petty as shit.

I don't like addressing specific members of the site, but @WhyDidIDoThis, the last thing you want to be doing is making an extremely poor effort to misrepresent the things being said. You already know we archive and screenshot everything so lying about our intentions will get you nowhere.

I won't deny that this thread has had some trouble with spergs in the past, but the vast majority of this thread has been people taking the piss out of Jerry, someone who genuinely hates a My Little Pony character because people compared it's initial episode to SJWs. Implying he angers us is a joke. It WAS a joke, so much so that "People who make us extremely angry" was a tagline on 8-Chan for a good portion of last year. That's what you're dealing with here.
 
Back