Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
What do you think abot the Shoe-Lauren drama. Can you be friends with someone with different political beliefs? Do you have any friedns with different poltical beleifs? Or do you think anyone that doesn’t agree with you and voted trump is too stupid to be your friend?

Saying something is "just politics" reeks of privilege.

People did this a lot for the kneeling NFL thing. "I don't want to deal with 'politics' on my game day, I just want to watch a Football game!" What's "politics" to one person might be a very real situation that another has to deal with on a daily basis. One person might say "y'know, all welfare is cancer, but that's just my political opinion," but another person might be coming up on their insurance being cancelled because of the ACA's collapse.

I really don't like the phrase "it's just politics," I'd rather go by individual beliefs.

So let's look at a couple:

If I have a friend who's a socialist, someone who's anti-capitalist, I can deal with being their friend. Our differences in belief are over economic systems. I don't know how many fundamental moral claims we'd differ on (insofar as treating people equally, respecting people's autonomy, etc...).

Let's say I have another friend who hops into boats in the ocean to turn back refugee ships that save people who are drowning when they attempt to cross the seas. These are irreconcilable differences. I could never see myself being friends with someone who differs from me so much on so many things that I consider "essential" to being a decent human being.

To brush off all of Lauren's bat-shit insane, borderline-nazi, "trad-con" views as just "politics" is so insanely disrespectful to people who are impacted in a very real and negative why by the types of rhetoric that Lauren supports.

June is also a spineless dumbfuck, but that's for another time.
 
Saying something is "just politics" reeks of privilege.

People did this a lot for the kneeling NFL thing. "I don't want to deal with 'politics' on my game day, I just want to watch a Football game!" What's "politics" to one person might be a very real situation that another has to deal with on a daily basis. One person might say "y'know, all welfare is cancer, but that's just my political opinion," but another person might be coming up on their insurance being cancelled because of the ACA's collapse.

I really don't like the phrase "it's just politics," I'd rather go by individual beliefs.

So let's look at a couple:

If I have a friend who's a socialist, someone who's anti-capitalist, I can deal with being their friend. Our differences in belief are over economic systems. I don't know how many fundamental moral claims we'd differ on (insofar as treating people equally, respecting people's autonomy, etc...).

Let's say I have another friend who hops into boats in the ocean to turn back refugee ships that save people who are drowning when they attempt to cross the seas. These are irreconcilable differences. I could never see myself being friends with someone who differs from me so much on so many things that I consider "essential" to being a decent human being.

To brush off all of Lauren's bat-shit insane, borderline-nazi, "trad-con" views as just "politics" is so insanely disrespectful to people who are impacted in a very real and negative why by the types of rhetoric that Lauren supports.

June is also a spineless dumbfuck, but that's for another time.

Yh too long, i aint reading that but A for effort.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Tim Buckley
nice meme

Ok sincere question. What exactly is going through your head that makes you think you're gonna get this thread taken down?

Bonus question: Even if you were to get it taken down, don't you know that that would just make you look like 10x more of a total in the closet faggot who has something to hide?
 
Ok sincere question. What exactly is going through your head that makes you think you're gonna get this thread taken down?

Bonus question: Even if you were to get it taken down, don't you know that that would just make you look like 10x more of a total in the closet faggot who has something to hide?
wat, srsly? I doubt 99% of the admin on this site even know who I am, there's no reason I could ever get shit removed from this site.
 
wat, srsly? I doubt 99% of the admin on this site even know who I am, there's no reason I could ever get shit removed from this site.
I KNOW THE ADMINS AND IM GONNA SHUT THIS SHIT DOWN REEEEE
Oh wait, i dont know shit, i was merely pretending to be retarded
-Tiny 2018
Not only are you small in size, you are tiny at everything, i pity you
 
I haven't checked, but I think it's been at least a month (2017?) since you agreed to study the topic of genetics in order to debate Race Realism with Jean-Francois Gariepy, Destiny.

Are you ready? If not, does that mean you concede?
 
wat, srsly? I doubt 99% of the admin on this site even know who I am, there's no reason I could ever get shit removed from this site.

Honest question. If you are such a mental heavyweight that supposedly has raiper-like wit, why haven't we seen any of it on display?

The only thing I have seen is extremely childish antics which makes me strongly suspect you are truly afraid to answer any of our questions in text form lest you cannot use any verbal tricks to weasel out of it and go on the offensive.
 
Honest question. If you are such a mental heavyweight that supposedly has raiper-like wit, why haven't we seen any of it on display?

The only thing I have seen is extremely childish antics which makes me strongly suspect you are truly afraid to answer any of our questions in text form lest you cannot use any verbal tricks to weasel out of it and go on the offensive.

I'll copy/paste the same reply I did to someone who actually DM'd me this question, if you're genuinely curious -

(part of this includes quotes from their post so you understand what I'm responding to)

>So why don't you do that in your thread? If you go low effort it just paints you worse than a bunch of internet forum loser people.

I've engaged with these types of people before. No one cares about what's true about anything, it's all about slandering a person you don't like for whatever reason. I have wasted so much time trying to "change people's minds" using fact vs fiction and I've learned over the past 1-2 years that it's a total waste of time. It's one of the huge reasons why I'd taken a step back from doing online debate stuff: people care about narratives, not anything remotely true.

>You've been really cagey about me and a few of the others saying the ethical CP stuff you've said is just as weird as the lolicon people, and you frame that as defending lolicon &/or being into it.

Because I'm literally in the thread as only a bad faith actor, I'm only there to get a rise out of people because it's funny to me. Do you honestly think if I spent an hour in that thread answering questions honestly it wouldn't just be a ton of people repeating the same, regurgitated bullshit before/after? Literally 90% of that thread's info about me is (easily) verifiably false. I've done long-form content debunking a ton of the shit that people spread about me and none of it even matters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egoyHzHn8Xk

(end response to that person)

tl;dr when I got into "internet debating" years ago I thought it'd be really fun to test arguments/philosophy against other people in order to root out the "truest" to reality argument. What ended up happening was people taking small clips of everything I've said out of context to construct these elaborate strawmen that have little to do with any of my actual beliefs, ie: unironically suggesting I am pro child-porn because of a 20 second clip taken from a 2 hour debate where I argue in the affirmative for age of consent laws against Amos Yee. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w

Also I don't feel the need to "prove my wit" here, I know I'm witty because I made a somewhat decent career online being witty. You can chalk it up to "internet dickriders" etc...or whatever you want, but where I succeeded literally hundreds of thousands of others fail. If you want, you can say that I'm not really funny at all, but then you'd have to admit that I grew my audience on the shoulders of my superior gameplay, and I don't think either of us want to defend that proposition. :)
 
Back