Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,414
She's very much peddling talking points from other loons and doesn't really have a thought of her own.

Much like her contemporaries on the opposite side of the aisle? I don't really get the point considering it's Sargon we're discussing in this thread, and he's more of a centrist than anything.
 
Sargon isn’t a centrist, he always sides with the right and the few points he deviates like Healthcare is because he has to because he lives in England and knows the NHS works. Otherwise supported Trump, supported Brexit, I think he has always voted Tori in the recent past, surrounds himself with Alt-righters. Has been on video saying he would side with the Nazis over the Left. He claims to be a centrist so he can attempt to appeal to more people otherwise he is rightwing. He is also is just an idiot.

Sargon is center-right definitely, he is center left for the american right probably, but in ,England he is center right, but as much as I think he is a sperg, he never voted for the toris, he has disdain for them and basically thinks they aren't much more than popularity seekers (which is true), I have no clue who he voted for, but he has said that he never voted and never will vote conservative.

He also supported trump as the lesser of evils, but I think its an outright lie since he was reddit tier fagging MAGA
 
Sargon is a absolute beacon of hope. He proves that no matter how mediocre and bland you are, if you can manage to talk about things you have a minutia of understanding without literally projectile vomiting on camera, desperate politifags will push you to heights of e-fame hitherto unknown to manlet kind.
 
Maybe another altright fight on the horizon.

James Allsup made a video criticizing Sargon for conflating totalitarianism with identitarianism. Sargon responds with this where he asserts it has to be totalitarian (James gave examples to the contrary) and that James just isnt smart enough to understand the words Sargon uses in an apparent fb debate they had. I cant see it, not a member of the Liberalist group.

Allsup said some stupid stuff too and opened himself up to this kind of retort by not being more careful with his words but it's like Sarg became his own parody.

 

I get the impression this young conservative has no clue what she's on about. I mention her here because she was at the rally and is someone who I found on youtube whose jumped on to the Alt-Right movement.

She's very much peddling talking points from other loons and doesn't really have a thought of her own.
She’s one of the Berkeley College Republicans. It’s cool cuz she was born and raised in Berkeley, but unfortunate she is just running some relatively shallow boilerplate talking points.
 
UKIP is dead? Well...that's bad... it means Britain has no anti-immigration party. Since Tory voters are more supportive of immigration than Labour (but Labour leadership is pro-immigration still)

https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/991608736753086464

>But Brexit!
The Tory party and even UKIP were more concerned with EU immigration, which isnt that bad and probably wont reduce total immigration.

This is going to be a problem...
 
UKIP made itself a single-issue party that were entirely dependent on Farage to survive.

Without Brexit to whine for and without Farage to lead them, they've effectively been crippled and currently have an extremely high turnover rate on leaders. Most of those leaders don't seem to have the ability to speak complete and utter bullshit and sound serious like Farage does, so it's no wonder they haven't lasted.
 
Can't Britain just do a point system like Australia and be done with this debate.
They had a referendum on it and the Great British public rejected it. It was the funniest political event before Trump, seeing the Lib Dems cuck themselves to the Tories entirely just so the last item on their platform could be rejected out of hand by the voters.
 
They had a referendum on it and the Great British public rejected it. It was the funniest political event before Trump, seeing the Lib Dems cuck themselves to the Tories entirely just so the last item on their platform could be rejected out of hand by the voters.


I think he's talking about a points system for immigration like Australia has *, not proportional representation , like the libdems were pushing.

*Although I've been following a debate between Aussies elsewhere, and all that gets you is educated chinky mass immigration and population replacement.
 
What he said.

I'd like to know more about how that works. I had a relative who did some travelling in Australia, but staying as a permanent resident would've cost thousands of dollars.

If anyone has info, do let me know.
 
I think he's talking about a points system for immigration like Australia has *, not proportional representation , like the libdems were pushing.

*Although I've been following a debate between Aussies elsewhere, and all that gets you is educated chinky mass immigration and population replacement.

What he said.

I'd like to know more about how that works. I had a relative who did some travelling in Australia, but staying as a permanent resident would've cost thousands of dollars.
If anyone has info, do let me know.

My mistake. From what I can remember after reading The Strange Death of Europe, some of the reasons for the UK's atrocious immigration system was Tony Blair's opening up the floodgates and the EU Freedom of Movement clauses giving preference to EU citizens. If I'm not mistaken, besides the Yellow wave into Australia I also believe they accepted a shit ton of Afghanis and Iraqis.
 
UKIP is dead? Well...that's bad... it means Britain has no anti-immigration party. Since Tory voters are more supportive of immigration than Labour (but Labour leadership is pro-immigration still)

https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/991608736753086464

>But Brexit!
The Tory party and even UKIP were more concerned with EU immigration, which isnt that bad and probably wont reduce total immigration.

This is going to be a problem...

The thing with the UK's first-past-the-post electoral system is that it is geared towards the creation of a two-party establishment, so it is exceedingly difficult for any third party to gain momentum. In principle, the advantage of the system is that it gives voters a clear choice between a stable majority government and a strong opposition to hold them to account (as opposed to the mess that exists in a lot of European parliamentary systems), but in practice, the system is only as good as the political parties that comprise it.

I have believed for a long time now that the biggest problem with the British two-party establishment is that it doesn't reflect the real divisions that exist in popular opinion across the country, and the result is that we are stuck with a parliament that is broadly unrepresentative of the British people. There have been some populist insurgencies (Corbyn, UKIP, the SNP, etc), but they lack the broad appeal due to the way that votes are currently divided.

If you were to poll the British people to find out which political issues are most concerning to them, I'd wager that most would probably answer with "immigration" and "the economy". I'd also wager that the average Brit is fairly right-of-center when it comes to the former, but fairly left-of-center when it comes to the latter. The trouble is, people who hold these sorts of views are without any solid representation, and broadly divided between the two major parties.
 
Carl sulkily breaking up with the AltRight, like a teenager would.

Dc84PtiU8AEJC4V.jpg


Who actually started this feud? I think it was Sargon and other skeptics. Am I right?
 
Carl sulkily breaking up with the AltRight, like a teenager would.

Dc84PtiU8AEJC4V.jpg


Who actually started this feud? I think it was Sargon and other skeptics. Am I right?
He made a comment about James Allsup being wrong about identity politics because identity politics is apparently "Inherently Totalitarian" because you know, the civil rights movement was such a huge totalitarian that it grew little black hitlers :sighduck:.
Anyways, alt-right fags gets triggered and starts autistically screeching "debate us! debate us!" on literally any and all livestreams they can get any prominent speakers on.
Sargon doesn't wanna do it because he knows hes a shitty debater and he'll get BTFO if he does despite the fact that debating race nationalism is the easier thing to debate against if you're smarter than a shit on log.
So he resorts to the Anita Sarkessian style withdrawl of "u goys were mean 2 me and my internet fwends and family" and the all time classic "i dont even care about you guys!" despite the fact that this whole situation arose from talking about in the first place. Irony :story:.

By the way does it seem like the alt-right just has a hate boner for sargon of asshit? Even when he makes some one off comment about them they loose their collected shit over him.
 
Back