DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr. "Get That Ass Swagged" instead of just deleting his responses, he deleted his whole Twitter. He really is terrified.
https://twitter.com/KingSwagginz
king.png


Edit: Nevermind he dropped his Kingship to become an Emperor
@EmperorSwagginz
 
Last edited:
Mr. "Get That Ass Swagged" instead of just deleting his responses, he deleted his whole Twitter. He really is terrified.
https://twitter.com/KingSwagginz
View attachment 462001

If she makes a new account named "EmperorSwagginz" I will bust my nuts laughing. When she makes it, I mean. Duh.

Shame to think she's probably never going to be on a dox list since she's such a goddamned pussy. Plenty of people crow and act tough when they're called out on their dumb behavior, but Swaggy is only tough as long as she gets to have privileges of uncontested power over others. Out of reach of her "GTAS"-bullshit she's all "I am a bigger person and don't care what you think, I shall ignore you in eight paragraphs or more."

LARPers would mockingly call this kid a nerd.
 
No matter what Swaggins calls herself, they'll always just be another dumb paypig to Phil. The SECOND she says something he doesn't like, Phil will publicly shit on them while all the kids in chat laugh along with him. All Swaggins is doing is making so no one feels sorry for her when that happens.
 
No matter what Swaggins calls herself, they'll always just be another dumb paypig to Phil. The SECOND she says something he doesn't like, Phil will publicly shit on them while all the kids in chat laugh along with him. All Swaggins is doing is making so no one feels sorry for her when that happens.

Can we call this behaviour "Yolodipping"?

upload_2018-5-31_6-56-51.png
 
I don't really know anything about fighting game strategies, so it doesn't help Phil sound anything less like a whinging child when he says "The game isn't as good anymore because they took out muh footsies!"

Well, in the case of Street Fighter V he's right but he's not the only one saying this. Everyone in the FGC has the same exact opinion so he's not a trailblazer by any sort of measure.

Saying Street Fighter V is bad is like saying water is wet at this point.
 
Phil said May was one of his best months ever on Twitch, we know this is bullshit. Cannot wait to see the actual numbers from @actually apt name indeed. On observation his tips and donations seemed slow AF this month.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: rizlajizzla
Phil said May was one of his best months ever on Twitch, we know this is bullshit. Cannot wait to see the actual numbers from @actually apt name indeed. On observation his tips and donations seemed slow AF this month.

Well, actually ( 8) ), this month looks to be a little better than the last 2. Not gonna post anything yet, but I'm pretty sure his Twitch total take will be up a bit. Don't know about Youtube yet. Patreon, on the other hand, looks to have dropped, but that's @SoapQueen1 's domain.
 
Phil understands very little about the very games he plays, or game theory in general. This kind of strategy is straight from game theory. You want your opponent in a position where they have no correct choice. If you're either right or you're wrong 50% of the time, it literally doesn't matter what you do.

In non-game theory reasons strategy like this works, despite the meaninglessness of the decision you put your opponent to, your opponent is in the position of actually having to think about it anyway. When it turns out meaningless and there's no clearly good choice, it puts stress on them, which in turn increases the mistakes they make.

There are obviously more complicated situations that don't involve straight 50/50 odds, like in poker, where the game theoretical optimal choice is to bluff with a frequency that given the size of the bluff and the pot, the frequency correlates with the odds your opponent is calling that either option has equal EV. Again, you're giving them no "right" decision.

Obviously, if your opponent is less than skilled and has recognizable patterns (like Phil himself), you exploit those often by doing things that are "wrong" from an optimal strategy perspective (look up Nash equilibrium for what this means), but right from the perspective of beating that particular opponent.

However, if you don't know what the "right" move is, you don't know what the "wrong" move is or when the right time to make the wrong move is.

Phil lacks a basic comprehension of games. Obviously, you don't have to be a mathematical theorist specializing in games to have an intuitive grasp of this. A lot of 12 year olds who are good at games grasp this kind of stuff intuitively and have never even heard of game theory. But Phil lacks this on a fundamental level.

A bit :autism: I suppose, but he's just really bad at games. It's not that he's necessarily clumsy or stupid, but he doesn't grasp these ideas and has no interest in learning from his mistakes.

I've said it before, but Phil seems to lack the psychological capability to even enjoy games. Maybe that's why he has such trouble bothering to learn anything. The fun from games arises from challenge, and rising to master that challenge. In vidya, learning is a drug, and solving puzzles or overcoming a tough boss gives you a hit of feelgood chemicals. Failing only makes it feel better when you eventually do overcome. Mastering the rules of the game and using that mastery to overcome challenges, either from the AI or from other players, is the whole reason why it's fun to play a game. Even easy or artier games like Journey have this to some extent (at least, the good ones do), it's just the challenge is more about the character's journey than your own.

My autistic fan theory is that Phil either never got this psychological hit of endorphins from gaming, or he had it coached out of him. He's a spoiled rich kid from a well-off white family. He's clearly been coddled quite a bit, and so he's grown to dislike challenge. He dislikes failing so much that he isn't bothered about overcoming, he just treats it like a job where he always takes the path of least resistance. He can't take the hit to his ego that failing at a game presents, no matter the reward, so he just sits there sulking and """interacting""" with chat for pennies. Psychologically, there's no reason for him to play games. He's depriving himself of the chemical hit that the rest of us get when gaming. He games because it's an easy way for him to make a living (not suggesting all streamers who do it as a job have it easy, but most of them put significantly more effort and money into their business than Dave does).

It'd be sad if he weren't such an abrasive, toxic cunt about everything.
:autism::autism::autism: over
 
My life must be sad but I'm legit hyped for DarksydePhil v DarkskinPhil. I always thought they'd never agree to play sets together, because LTG gets triggered as fuck when DSP gets mentioned in his chat, and Dave won't want the negativity/bruises to his ego.

This is actually a smart business move by DSP, holy shit. Folk will watch this, for the wrong reasons, but they'll watch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back