Manosphere Return of Kings and Roosh V / Roosh Vorek / Daryush Valizadeh - Thread #2: Return of Douches. NPC Roosh, Hater of Human Female Buttocks & also just Human Females in General.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SU 390
  • Start date Start date
S

SU 390

Guest
kiwifarms.net
Since the last thread was locked due to derailment, hopefully that won't happen again (hopefully).

Anyway, from the last thread.

Return of Kings is a blogging site that discuss topics about dating, culture, lifestyle, masculinity and game. No, not video games, but 'game', the Pick Up Artist term of being successful in dating. ROK is a misogynist, anti-gay, sometimes anti-minority site that prattle on about the end of Western society/civilization due to Feminism, Liberalism, Socialism, declining American cultures, how to be successful with women at the same time belittle them.

Their articles are laughable at best. By laughable the articles are stupid, surprisingly well written at times and a huge what the fuck? The good people (using the term good loosely here) of ROK are mostly pandering towards the MRA, 'Nice Guy', douchebag, PUA audience. They are for entertainment reading only. Roosh V is the admin of this site and his own site.

EDIT: Forgot to add the link to the site.
http://www.returnofkings.com/
http://www.returnofkings.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.returnofkings.com/29666/why-society-owes-men-sex

OH HAI

Elliot-Rodger.jpg
 
There is some good societal commentary in that article.. by 'some' I mean not a lot, certainly not enough to redeem it from its ridiculous premise. But hey, he (probably) tried (to clickbait and generally stir up shit).
 
I'm honestly surprised that nobody has mentioned Mr. Davis M.J. Aurini yet. I've been following this guy along with "New Right" otherwise known as "Dark Enlightenment" spergs for awhile now. The New Rightists deserve their own thread (basically Nazis with fedoras).

Back to Aurini, he expresses himself in an utterly flamboyant and fedora-core way. When I saw the first video of him, he reminded me so much of the infamous Satanist Anton LaVey:
Patriarch.jpg

While he detests hedonism and calls for women to return to piety. He banged some guy's wife and created a lot of drama: http://venturephilosophy.blogspot.com/2013/03/davis-mj-aurini-caught-with-his-pants.html

On his previous Reddit account before it was banned, he proclaimed that he engaged in bisexual orgies. From watching his YouTube videos, he claims to be a monarchist and libertarian. He "liked" a speech by Commander Rockwell of the American Nazi Party.

Here are some of his most fedora-core videos:

His ROK author profile: http://www.returnofkings.com/author/aurini

He is currently making a documentary about Anita and is demanding around $15,000 for it: http://www.patreon.com/thesarkeesianeffect
 
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/
Found this via an article on RoK.
The Sixteen Commandments of Poon said:
Set yourself apart from other men and connect with a woman’s emotional landscape. Her mind is an alien world that requires deft navigation to reach your rendevous.
Oh god, it's what? What?! I genuinely laughed when I read that passage.

Ooh, found another good quote:
Touching a woman inappropriately on the first date will get you further with her than not touching her at all.
No words. I have no words.
 
When you guys say "It's a trolling site," do you mean "they're saying shit they don't believe to get attention" or "they're saying shit they DO believe, but doing it loudly and offensively to get attention"? If the former, I disagree. I've seen enough guys in my life who actually believe this shite to assume that they're piloting a :ruse:
 
When you guys say "It's a trolling site," do you mean "they're saying shit they don't believe to get attention" or "they're saying shit they DO believe, but doing it loudly and offensively to get attention"? If the former, I disagree. I've seen enough guys in my life who actually believe this shite to assume that they're piloting a :ruse:
The authors contributing towards Return of Kings have a process.

1) Take something grounded in reality.
2) Spin the issue to be offensive as possible.
3) Write it formally.

The result is an article that looks real, has a basis in something truthy, and is often backed up by an existing set of people who will defend it. The most interesting thing about RoK articles are their comments, which are genuine. There the real, honest-to-god repillers go to nod their heads in agreement at something fictitious.

It's really easy. Anyone can do it. The hardest part is finding something fact based and deriving an offensive point from it. If I go to Yahoo News and look at the first article, it's about Ray Rice appealing his suspension. It's a topic I know very little about and something I am not going to put time into researching, so we're good to go. Time to write an RoK article.

---

Ray Rice has reported he will be appealing the indefinite suspension placed against him by the NFL committee. A Baltimore Ravens running back, Rice was picked up in 2008 and has had an enduring and successful career playing professional sports.

The suspension, initially only two games, comes after a video taped dispute between his then-fiance and Rice was leaked. The NFL based this action on its domestic abuse policy, which did not exist until after the video was released. This means that the policy was drafted only entirely to punish Rice for events that had happened months ago to a person he has already made amends with. This will cost Rice an estimated $14,000,000 if he is not allowed back.

This reactionary, retroactive decision making baffles me. It is something that could not, and should not, be allowed by any body. With an immense amount of cash on the line, it leaves fans and onlookers asking: "Why?". The other person in the tape later went on to marry Rice, so whatever transpired was obviously not a defining moment in their relationship. The outcry and demerits levied against Rice come as a surprise to all level-headed spectators.

Janay Palmer Cares Less Than You Do
The most immediate thing to come to mind when considering this is: why do people care? Janay Palmer doesn't. She married Rice months after the taped event took place. People are whining about domestic abuse and calling this a clear cut case of assault, but Janay Palmer apparently doesn't think so. If anything, this is insulting and hurtful to her. The married couple are together being denied $14,000,000.

It's also apparent to me that these reactionary neo-feminists doubt Palmer's intelligence and adult decision-making skills. They've decided for her that this is a problem, they've decided for her to punish her husband and lover, and they've decided for her to declare her a victim.

People Have Been Allowed Back After More
I have no doubt Ray Rice will be allowed back. I have no doubt because Michael Vick is currently a New York Jets quarterback. Despite a cataclysmic level of hooplah generated by PETA, an endless amount of whining from the far-left, a prioritizing of animal rights over human rights, and a jail sentence, Vick was drafted back into the NFL this March. All Rice did was throw a punch. It's actually quite telling about the general public to see such a fuss be made.

The NFL is a business full of cheaters, crooks, and bad people with too much money. Rice isn't one of those. Rice is a married man trying to continue his career in sports. If you want to throw a fit over him, you could probably make arguments against every official and player in the entire industry. I'm not seeing it and I don't care to see it. This is a personal problem.

What Happened to Privacy Rights?
All of this comes directly after 'The Fappening'. A national media frenzy sparked by hackers targeting their favorite red carpet celebrities. The world got to see the money shots of Jennifer Lawrence, and in a collective sigh of disappointment they blamed the Internet and cried "privacy rights". So why no privacy rights for Palmer and Rice? Why is an embarrassing moment of their life together made into a national issue at the cost of his livelihood?

This sort of double-think, and hatred leveled against men by the far left and the neo-feminists, is patent and obvious. It sticks out like a sore thumb and should make us wonder, "if something like this can happen to a man like Ray Rice, can't it happen to me?" And the answer is yes. As these animals gain power and ground, it will happen to more people.. It starts out with the rich and famous, in a way they can "justify" it by exasperating the issue and fabricating problems. After a few years, they'll be able to drop bombs on everyone they want it to. If you're a straight, white, successful male, that means you.

Think about it, and join me in supporting Ray Rice's reintegration. It's what's fair. Make your voice heard and give no quarter, or quarterback.
 
Last edited:
The authors contributing towards Return of Kings have a process.

1) Take something grounded in reality.
2) Spin the issue to be offensive as possible.
3) Write it formally.

The result is an article that looks real, has a basis in something truthy, and is often backed up by an existing set of people who will defend it. The most interesting thing about RoK articles are their comments, which are genuine. There the real, honest-to-god repillers go to nod their heads in agreement at something fictitious.

It's really easy. Anyone can do it. The hardest part is finding something fact based and deriving an offensive point from it. If I go to Yahoo News and look at the first article, it's about Ray Rice appealing his suspension. It's a topic I know very little about and something I am not going to put time into researching, so we're good to go. Time to write an RoK article.

---

Ray Rice has reported he will be appealing the indefinite suspension placed against him by the NFL committee. A Baltimore Ravens running back, Rice was picked up in 2008 and has had an enduring and successful career playing professional sports.

The suspension, initially only two games, comes after a video taped dispute between his then-fiance and Rice was leaked. The NFL based this action on its domestic abuse policy, which did not exist until after the video was released. This means that the policy was drafted only entirely to punish Rice for events that had happened months ago to a person he has already made amends with. This will cost Rice an estimated $14,000,000 if he is not allowed back.

This reactionary, retroactive decision making baffles me. It is something that could not, and should not, be allowed by any body. With an immense amount of cash on the line, it leaves fans and onlookers asking: "Why?". The other person in the tape later went on to marry Rice, so whatever transpired was obviously not a defining moment in their relationship. The outcry and demerits levied against Rice come as a surprise to all level-headed spectators.

Janay Palmer Cares Less Than You Do
The most immediate thing to come to mind when considering this is: why do people care? Janay Palmer doesn't. She married Rice months after the taped event took place. People are whining about domestic abuse and calling this a clear cut case of assault, but Janay Palmer apparently doesn't think so. If anything, this is insulting and hurtful to her. The married couple are together being denied $14,000,000.

It's also apparent to me that these reactionary neo-feminists doubt Palmer's intelligence and adult decision-making skills. They've decided for her that this is a problem, they've decided for her to punish her husband and lover, and they've decided for her to declare her a victim.

People Have Been Allowed Back After More
I have no doubt Ray Rice will be allowed back. I have no doubt because Michael Vick is currently a New York Jets quarterback. Despite a cataclysmic level of hooplah generated by PETA, an endless amount of whining from the far-left, a prioritizing of animal rights over human rights, and a jail sentence, Vick was drafted back into the NFL this March. All Rice did was throw a punch. It's actually quite telling about the general public to see such a fuss be made.

The NFL is a business full of cheaters, crooks, and bad people with too much money. Rice isn't one of those. Rice is a married man trying to continue his career in sports. If you want to throw a fit over him, you could probably make arguments against every official and player in the entire industry. I'm not seeing it and I don't care to see it. This is a personal problem.

What Happened to Privacy Rights?
All of this comes directly after 'The Fappening'. A national media frenzy sparked by hackers targeting their favorite red carpet celebrities. The world got to see the money shots of Jennifer Lawrence, and in a collective sigh of disappointment they blamed the Internet and cried "privacy rights". So why no privacy rights for Palmer and Rice? Why is an embarrassing moment of their life together made into a national issue at the cost of his livelihood?

This sort of double-think, and hatred leveled against men by the far left and the neo-feminists, is patent and obvious. It sticks out like a sore thumb and should make us wonder, "if something like this can happen to a man like Ray Rice, can't it happen to me?" And the answer is yes. As these animals gain power and ground, it will happen to more people.. It starts out with the rich and famous, in a way they can "justify" it by exasperating the issue and fabricating problems. After a few years, they'll be able to drop bombs on everyone they want it to. If you're a straight, white, successful male, that means you.

Think about it, and join me in supporting Ray Rice's reintegration. It's what's fair. Make your voice heard and give no quarter, or quarterback.
Clearly they are just intimidated by an alpha keeping his woman in line and in the house where she belongs I mean... wait a minute this isn't ROK. Damn it you got me Null.
 
Back