Inactive Andrew Dobson / Tom Preston / CattyN - STOP DOING SEXIST CRAP

He's still counting this as a win. View attachment 463399

The sad and/or funny part is that he cannot stop to think for even a second about the problem inherent in him being called a transphobe for being a dick to a person who happened to be trans. This is the shit he pushes on everyone else all the time, everyone's a homophobe, nazi, etc. etc., and now that he's getting the other end of the stick he's all like "omg why are they saying I hate trans people???? I don't understand omg :/"
 
The sad and/or funny part is that he cannot stop to think for even a second about the problem inherent in him being called a transphobe for being a dick to a person who happened to be trans. This is the shit he pushes on everyone else all the time, everyone's a homophobe, nazi, etc. etc., and now that he's getting the other end of the stick he's all like "omg why are they saying I hate trans people???? I don't understand omg :/"

And she's not just trans, she's a minor! :spudking:
 
View attachment 463687

Can someone translate this mess? I don't know what the fuck toleratin is.
When Karl Popper framed the tolerance paradox, he did not mean to defenestrate the very concept of tolerance.

Karl Popper said:
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
 
dobson does know that screaming "shut it down" when someone disagrees is basically admitting "they're right" to most people, right?

he should know by not letting people saying their side, you give them free "victim bux" and they can use that against people like dobson
and to point out the other side of the coin
does dobson not know what it means to give someone enough rope to hang themselves?
by letting the other person state what they believe, you can get them to stick their foot in their mouth. you can find the linchpin in their arguments and pull it out. you remove mystique and can make them a fool.

but that's too much work.

edit:my spelling is good now
 
Last edited:
and to point out the other side of the coin
does dobson not know what it means to give someone enough rope to hang themselves?
by letter the other person state what they believe, you can get them to stick their foot in their mouth. you can find the linchpin in their arguments and pull it out. you remove mystique and can make them a fool.

but that's too much work.
Let’s be honest, doing that is so much more fun and hilarious than straight up censoring someone. Dobson doesn’t know what he’s missing. But then again, he’s the person who has been given the rope.
 
View attachment 463687
Can someone translate this mess? I don't know what the fuck toleratin is.
Dobson forgot the g in tolerating.

Also, this comic confuses me. What exactly does one hope to gain by trying to prevent anyone, let alone someone IN POWER, from saying things like what he has his straw drumpf saying? Doesn't that illuminate the voters (leaving aside the things Dumbson is putting into his straw drumpf's mouth, ie Trump never actually said the words "White Supremacists can be very fine people")? And also, he portrayed people wanting to impeach Trump after they heard those words, so um, maybe Straw Drumpf's words aren't so appealing/hypnotic? If straw drumpf saying what dumbson portrays makes people angry and want to impeach him, HOW IS LETTING HIM SPEAK BAD?!

More from his facebook post on genocide:

DobsonEqualitysperg5.JPG


DobsonEqualitysperg6.JPG

So then this Priscilla (who appears to be a BLM activist and certainly is an IngSocJus Warrior) proceeds to claim shit like Andrew Gorman said is going in Turkey rn is also happening in America rn (in the ghetto, in the ghettoooo....):
DobsonEqualitysperg7.JPG

Somehow I don't think this Priscilla lady knows jack and shit about what goes on in Turkey, so she should take her own advice about not speaking about things she has NO knowledge of, like she told Andrew Gorman. The dude wasn't speaking "on the minority perspective", he was speaking on oppressive government. Her own commentary lacked facts as well (CITATION NEEDED).

His post on FB about the Tumblr resolution:

DobsonTransapologysperg.JPG

Well at least he called her "her" and not "they"...

Oh great, he's got another comic coming out, later this week:

DobsonIce3sperg6.JPG
 
and to point out the other side of the coin
does dobson not know what it means to give someone enough rope to hang themselves?
by letting the other person state what they believe, you can get them to stick their foot in their mouth. you can find the linchpin in their arguments and pull it out. you remove mystique and can make them a fool.

but that's too much work.

edit:my spelling is good now
and fucking hell, a third side to this

doesn't dobson realize that his arguments can be used against him?
what if one day he gets censored by the sites he goes to because "letting him speak his mind could corrupt people"?

oh right, dobson is on the right side of history, and he's one of those idiots that thinks morality is purely objective, and he's one of the good and pure people
and those evil nazi/death eaters/trump supporters/[insert fictional faction here] would never do that and get in the way of the heroes winning.
 
Uh...debates aren't framed as meeting in the middle. That's a NEGOTIATION. A debate is often framed as my side is better, here is why.

It's like he didn't even pay attention to the runup to the election, just the results...
It's like someone said earlier in this thread. Dobson literally does not know the meanings of words.
 
"That's why I like you - you constantly reevaluate your actions as regards to others, especially if you find out you made a mistake. Thank you for being honest and genuine."
WHAT FUCKING PLANET IS THIS LADY LIVING ON?!
Not on Earth, it seems. The only thing Dobson does is try to cover his own ass when he says something people call him out on. He may delete those posts, but he forgets one thing, the Internet never forgets.
 
By Dumbson logic the Nazis won, no seriously how many people both in the allied nations governments and military heard something a nazi said? How many civilians then and snce was told or heard about Nazism and it's talking points? By his definition there are millions if not billions of them!FOR FUCK'S BY HIS OWN DEFINITION HE IS ONE!
*Headdesk repeatedly*
 
Back