You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon
I can't say I'm surprised they like Lion King 1/2. I'd honestly bet money that it's probably where they actually nicked the 'the main characters sitting in a theater poking fun at the film' idea from. because I can only imagine them claiming it was snagged from mst3k for hipster points
Jerry: I hate those fucking crows in Dumbo because they're racist. Even though they're portrayed as pretty clever and gave Dumbo the ability to fly and are the only decent people the character finds in a film where everyone's needlessly antagonistic.
Also Jerry: Rap music is for exceptional dumb babies because they have ugly women dancing all gross-like and shit and that culture is stupid despite it being primarily a culture understood and enjoyed by black people.
The crows being black is kind of important to the theme. Dumbo’s whole life has sucked and he’s been ostracized and treated poorly because he looks different. Of course he’d find comfort in a group of minorities because they were being treated the same way.
I never understood why people think they’re racist. Is it because they talk in all jive and ebonics? How is that defamatory or offensive? That’s just a stereotype, and while racism is by definition discriminatory, defamatory, or hateful not all stereotypes fit that. For example, ‘black people love fried chicken’ isn’t a negative or racist stereotype because liking chicken isn’t a negative character trait. Same goes for Asians all being smart. In what world is being intelligent a negative trait? You certainly don’t call a race you hate intelligent. All black people being in gangs or portrayed as criminals is racist, however, because it’s meant to portray all blacks negatively.
Is it racist because the jive talk makes them sound ‘uneducated’ and therefore stupid? Maybe, but they are ultimately portrayed as one of the few decent characters in that movie, so they might be a little stereotyped at worst.
The crows being black is kind of important to the theme. Dumbo’s whole life has sucked and he’s been ostracized and treated poorly because he looks different. Of course he’d find comfort in a group of minorities because they were being treated the same way.
I never understood why people think they’re racist. Is it because they talk in all jive and ebonics? How is that defamatory or offensive? That’s just a stereotype, and while racism is by definition discriminatory or defamatory, not all stereotypes fit that. For example, ‘black people love fried chicken’ isn’t a negative or racist stereotype because liking chicken isn’t a negative character trait. Same goes for Asians all being smart. In what world is being intelligent a negative trait? All black people being in gangs or portrayed as criminals is racist, however because it’s meant to portray all blacks negatively.
Is it racist because the jive talk makes them sound ‘uneducated’ and therefore stupid? Maybe, but they are ultimately portrayed as one of the few decent characters in that movie, so they might be a little stereotyped at worst.
THANK YOU. To be honest, the crows were literally the coolest characters in the entire film and probably the best side characters in all of Disney. I remember when I first watched the film as a kid I used to try to emulate them alot. Just because of their nice personalities, having a cool and interesting design, best song, but were slick with everything they do. The funny thing about their voices and the way they act, is that it really captures black culture. Not believing when someone say something stupid and laughing at it, asking said person to actually do it if their not lying, and if they do we all cheer. They reminded about the type people I see around town and my own family. And if you think their voices makes them sound unintelligent and not slick or cool, then I can't help you with your awful hearing.
THANK YOU. To be honest, the crows were literally the coolest characters in the entire film and probably the best side character in Disney. I remember when I first watched the film as a kid I used to try emulate them alot. Just because their nice, had a cool and interesting design, best song, but were slick with everything. The funny thing about their voices and the way they act, is that it really captured black culture. Not believing when someone said something stupid and laughing, asking said the person to actually if their not lying, and if they do we all cheer. They reminded about the type people I see around town and my family. And if you think their voices makes them sound unintelligent and not slick or cool, then I can't help with your awful hearing.
Imagine being so secretly racist that the historical, factual, culture of a race of people makes you uncomfortable and you try to justify it using warped logic and "science".
“I don’t have to actually contend with people who point out that my evidence against Lily is doctored, falsified, or deliberately cut up to present her in the most negative light possible, because everyone who isn’t like me is all of these bad things. And that’s why I’m right.”
Point to the doctored or falsified posts of yours on this forum. Go ahead. Show us where we've doctored posts and I'll apologize and pledge to your goddamn patreon.
"Deliberately cut up" isn't a valid complaint, I've shared portions of posts before with a specific point in mind, where the cut portions were irrelevant, as have others. It's not something that really happens frequently, though.
I can't speak for the E4B, obviously, but for someone whose morality is so black and white, he loves to (to borrow a quote from him) "grind the axe" that they can't accept that people think differently from him. In other words, it's rich that someone who thinks every detractor of his is a "literal, actual Nazi" is railing against people for not being able to comprehend the idea of a differing opinion, but that's just his classic mindset in work.
I've noticed something, though, in these posts where he talks about his detractors... (obligatory DSP)
...he goes on and on about how there is always evidence either out there or presented to them that, as he says, "their rage is misplaced or wrong", but where is that evidence? Or rather, what is that evidence? Jerry, if you're innocent and if what we say here is "misplaced rage" or just plain wrong, then show us. Make an infographic. Release the "original" stockholm. Share a picture of you with Tara (who cares if she allegedly didn't like photos of herself out there, she's in jail, according to your most recent story, right?). Disprove our arguments. Believe it or not, like the "I'm protecting the children" example, people do have legitimate grievances against you. Ones that aren't "7-10 years old". Why don't you address them, instead of claiming that there are multitudes upon multitudes of evidence out there proving you're right? Because last I checked, we (the miscreants general detractors) are the only ones providing evidence. Come on, man, it's not like you have anything better to do.
I mean, dude, even Keemstar did an entire video where he defended himself.
Keemstar, that guy who was so hated by the Youtube community at one point, was more productive and well-respected then, than Jerry is now (relatively speaking). All Jerry has are excuses.
Point to the doctored or falsified posts of yours on this forum. Go ahead. Show us where we've doctored posts and I'll apologize and pledge to your goddamn patreon.
"Deliberately cut up" isn't a valid complaint, I've shared portions of posts before with a specific point in mind, where the cut portions were irrelevant, as have others. It's not something that really happens frequently, though.
I can't speak for the E4B, obviously, but for someone whose morality is so black and white, he loves to (to borrow a quote from him) "grind the axe" that they can't accept that people think differently from him. In other words, it's rich that someone who thinks every detractor of his is a "literal, actual Nazi" is railing against people for not being able to comprehend the idea of a differing opinion, but that's just his classic mindset in work.
I've noticed something, though, in these posts where he talks about his detractors... (obligatory DSP)
...he goes on and on about how there is always evidence either out there or presented to them that, as he says, "their rage is misplaced or wrong", but where is that evidence? Or rather, what is that evidence? Jerry, if you're innocent and if what we say here is "misplaced rage" or just plain wrong, then show us. Make an infographic. Release the "original" stockholm. Share a picture of you with Tara (who cares if she allegedly didn't like photos of herself out there, she's in jail, according to your most recent story, right?). Disprove our arguments. Believe it or not, like the "I'm protecting the children" example, people do have legitimate grievances against you. Ones that aren't "7-10 years old". Why don't you address them, instead of claiming that there are multitudes upon multitudes of evidence out there proving you're right? Because last I checked, we (the miscreants general detractors) are the only ones providing evidence. Come on, man, it's not like you have anything better to do.
I mean, dude, even Keemstar did an entire video where he defended himself.
Keemstar, that guy who was so hated by the Youtube community at one point, was more productive and well-respected then, than Jerry is now (relatively speaking). All Jerry has are excuses.
Just like when he’s talking tough, he’s full of shit. It’s just to convince his followers (and himself) that he has done nothing wrong and we’re the crazy ones for proving that he’s been lying or exaggerating for years.
With the way his fans believe every word he says, he’s never been in a position where he needed to present evidence.
So Patchworkheart and Josh Scorcher appear to have for lack of better word patched things up. not linking it but theres a post about it on patches deviantart
I'd dare say I can smell the bitterness from here.
isn't this illegal? I feel like this is brushing up against illegal.
And now as a side note I present "Lily the proffessional"
So Patchworkheart and Josh Scorcher appear to have for lack of better word patched things up. not linking it but theres a post about it on patches deviantart View attachment 470169
I'd dare say I can smell the bitterness from here.
View attachment 470170
isn't this illegal? I feel like this is brushing up against illegal.
First post:
lol, maybe this'll go somewhere, Jerry drama has been slow
second post:
who cares, watching TV shows on third party websites (something most all of us do) is technically just as bad
...why are they asking Jerry though? It's so easy to search "photoshop" on TPB. lmao
Jerry, if you do happen to read this, use lmgtfy. Please. If you're that "snarky head-bitch" you advertise yourself to be, then this will be the perfect thing for you
third post:
Jerry has terrible chemistry with fans
fourth post:
I rest my case
fifth post:
I REST MY CASE
sixth post:
OH DEAR GOD JERRY PLEASE KEEP GOING THIS IS GREAT
It's actually really impressive that Jerry thinks that people who message him with problems are more annoying than us. That's utterly fantastic. He hates his own needy fans more than us.
I've had this long-standing theory that he purposefully gives people bad advice to discourage them from asking him for help with their personal problems. This would've confirmed it if the advice he usually gives wasn't right in line with his behaviors and beliefs.
On a more real note, this thing feels kinda conflicting. On one hand, it's a good thing that Jerry up and said that he's tired of fans asking for advice, because now, they won't get terrible answers that will land them with 0s on group projects because a group member likes Trump or with a suspension because they kicked a dude in the nuts who tried to use a corny pickup line, both at Jerry's behest. It's good that he's telling them to get help from someone who's actually qualified. On the other hand, Jerry essentially extended a big "fuck you" to any people legitimately seeking help and looking for a confidant, and (for some wild reason) see that in Jerry. He is right, they should see therapists, rather than messaging some dude who does videos on kids cartoons and spends his days acting like a sped on Tumblr, but Jesus Christ, Jerry, what happened to having a "consequence-free environment"?
So Patchworkheart and Josh Scorcher appear to have for lack of better word patched things up. not linking it but theres a post about it on patches deviantart View attachment 470169
I'd dare say I can smell the bitterness from here.
View attachment 470170
isn't this illegal? I feel like this is brushing up against illegal.
This is why we post archives with links and screenshots. Not that the post he made linking to TPB was all that bad (it’d be hypocritical of me to say it was), but it’s good practice all the same.
This is why we post archives with links and screenshots. Not that the post he made linking to TPB was all that bad (it’d be hypocritical of me to say it was), but it’s good practice all the same.
He hasn't removed it. And I don't know if you know but the archive.is site has been shit since Tumblr has updated their privacy. Now you only have loading screens but the post doesn't load anymore.
Ah, thanks for bringing that up! I did some testing and it confirmed what I expected. It seems like archiving now just shows the loading bar regardless of archiver (archive.is or wayback), but whats interesting is that the wayback machine gives an error about bots.txt on Jerry's blog.
I've never had this issue on tumblr before, so I tried archiving completely random tumblr posts. No bots.txt related issue there, so it's not site-wide. Maybe it's just for hidden blogs?
So here's what I did: I created a tumblr blog whose url is just mashing the keyboard, made a boring test message, made the blog hidden, and archived it. Here's the result from the wayback machine:
Infinite loading! Basically useless from an archiving perspective, but it proves that tumblr isn't applying bots.txt to accounts.
That leads me to one simple and also highly tech-illiterate conclusion: Jerry's added a bots.txt to block archivers.
...This is obviously what innocent people who totally aren't pedophile sociopaths do, right?
Ah, good ole backtracking. "I have actually never done that, you're lying" is my fave part seeing as he did it in one of his recent GOWs, telling people to jump off a pier if they disagree with him.
(obligatory DSP)
