Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[Cowlick]

Don't worry, we'll find you. No one escapes our ever-watchful gaze. No one.

I don't know, so I'll just ask rhetorically; Do you have an "Edit" option on that post? Keep it there if so. You'll eventually be changing it to say, "Nobody used to, but eventually, one escaped...".

 

[Saney]

I don't know, so I'll just ask rhetorically; Do you have an "Edit" option on that post? Keep it there if so. You'll eventually be changing it to say, "Nobody used to, but eventually, one escaped...".

Better lolcows than you have tried and failed.

 

[Cowlick]

Better lolcows than you have tried and failed.

Last I checked, this thread was created to determine if I even WAS a "lolcow". (By the way, in my E-mail, that word showed-up as "lockers".) I don't know what one is, nor do I know-or-care if I am one... But the fact anyone here decided to pose that question about me when they had absolutely no interaction with me anywhere proves none of you know me.

1] Fact: None of you know me.
2] You don't know how good-or-bad (at whatever you're judging in your post) I truly am.
3] Without the knowledge described in #2, you don't know if anyone else is/was better-or-worse than me.
4] Without that knowledge, you can't say whether any that failed or succeeded were better or worse than me.

 

[Saney]

Last I checked, this thread was created to determine if I even WAS a "lolcow". (By the way, in my E-mail, that word showed-up as "lockers".) I don't know what one is, nor do I know-or-care if I am one...

The fact that you're here and arguing with us says otherwise.

 

[Cowlick]

Also: Cannot edit my posts, & my Usertitle is not showing on them.

The fact that you're here and arguing with us says otherwise.

I'm here, certainly... But not arguing with anyone on this Forum.

 

[ASoulMan]

Claims he isn't a lolcow.

Comes onto a thread on a forum that discusses lolcows.

 

[Le Bateleur]

Last I checked, this thread was created to determine if I even WAS a "lolcow". (By the way, in my E-mail, that word showed-up as "lockers".) I don't know what one is, nor do I know-or-care if I am one... But the fact anyone here decided to pose that question about me when they had absolutely no interaction with me anywhere proves none of you know me.

1] Fact: None of you know me.
2] You don't know how good-or-bad (at whatever you're judging in your post) I truly am.
3] Without the knowledge described in #2, you don't know if anyone else is/was better-or-worse than me.
4] Without that knowledge, you can't say whether any that failed or succeeded were better or worse than me.

"What the hell is a lawl-cow?!"

But seriously.

1) Protip: You are confusing the you-in-the-truest-sense (real-self/actual-self/power-word) with the strawman-persona/creation TJChurch/Cowlick. We know:have knowledge this strawman-persona/creation because of your antics on the internet/information-super-highway.
2) Irrelevant. We are evaluation the strawman-persona/creation.
3) See 2.
4) See 3.

 

[KingofManga420]

If you think you aren't one, why don't you tell us about yourself and why you aren't so we can all be friends?

 

[A Random]

Here's a simple test.

Prove you're not TJChurch in a meaningful way, as you initially claimed. You can't just state you're not him; you have to give valid evidence, elsewhere, that can prove the two of you are not one or the same.

 

[Mauvman Shuffleboard]

Also: Cannot edit my posts, & my Usertitle is not showing on them.

Users with the verified banner cannot change their title or edit their posts. Also, you set a status message and not a user title (which only become available after a certain number of posts/likes). Enjoy your stay.

 

[Cowlick]

Claims he isn't a lolcow.

Comes onto a thread on a forum that discusses lolcows.

Correction... My Side:

1] Stated a fact about myself.
2] Responds to a thread with his online Username in its title, a title asking a question about himself, based on his posts on other places online.

Members' Side:

1] Asks question about person on Forum he has no knowledge of.
2] Decides same person is something (not an actual word), & labels them as such, making no attempts to contact him, & making a very-public page about what they claim is the fact that he is this thing.

Seems redundant... Your side loses, not just due to comparing our actions/sides, but due to the actions of the opposite (members') side, which proves the majority (if not all) of them are losers.

 

[XYZpdq]

Decides same person is something (not an actual word).

 

[Total Dingus]

I don't understand a single thing you've said.

 

[A Random]

Wait, wait.

When you first posted, you said it wasn't you. Then now, after we insist it is you, you say it's you.

What is the truth?

 

[ASoulMan]

Correction... My Side:

1] Stated a fact about myself.
2] Responds to a thread with his online Username in its title, a title asking a question about himself, based on his posts on other places online.

Members' Side:

1] Asks question about person on Forum he has no knowledge of.
2] Decides same person is something (not an actual word), & labels them as such, making no attempts to contact him, & making a very-public page about what they claim is the fact that he is this thing.

Seems redundant... Your side loses, not just due to comparing our actions/sides, but due to the actions of the opposite (members') side, which proves the majority (if not all) of them are losers.

That's the nicest thing that anyone has ever said to me.

Thank you DJ Cowlick for your words of wisdom.

BTW The more you try to deny being a lolcow, the more you prove that you are indeed one.

 

[Dr. Meme]

Correction... My Side:

1] Stated a fact about myself.
2] Responds to a thread with his online Username in its title, a title asking a question about himself, based on his posts on other places online.

Members' Side:

1] Asks question about person on Forum he has no knowledge of.
2] Decides same person is something (not an actual word), & labels them as such, making no attempts to contact him, & making a very-public page about what they claim is the fact that he is this thing.

Seems redundant... Your side loses, not just due to comparing our actions/sides, but due to the actions of the opposite (members') side, which proves the majority (if not all) of them are losers.

Hey I'm not a loser I consider myself a pretty swinging dude.
And this is a place to discuss whether or not you are a lolcow, and you aren't doing yourself any favors

 

[Saney]

Seems redundant... Your side loses, not just due to comparing our actions/sides, but due to the actions of the opposite (members') side, which proves the majority (if not all) of them are losers.

Just so you know, insulting other users is against the rules.

 

[Dr. Meme]

Just so you know, insulting other users is against the rules.

When has a lolcow ever followed the rules

 

[GREEDY FIREMAN]

Correction... My Side:

1] Stated a fact about myself.
2] Responds to a thread with his online Username in its title, a title asking a question about himself, based on his posts on other places online.

Members' Side:

1] Asks question about person on Forum he has no knowledge of.
2] Decides same person is something (not an actual word), & labels them as such, making no attempts to contact him, & making a very-public page about what they claim is the fact that he is this thing.

Seems redundant... Your side loses, not just due to comparing our actions/sides, but due to the actions of the opposite (members') side, which proves the majority (if not all) of them are losers.

He doesn't get it, does he?

 

[KingofManga420]

Dude I said convince us. I wanted to get to know you man you type crazy sophisticated, did you get book learning at college?