I more or less ignore the queue, but I am just not getting inundated with worthless crap games the way people like Jim Sterling seem to think is happening all the time.
The closest you can see any of them is
if you found it on your Discovery Queue but even then you can just report it.
Even in the Discovery Queue you are very unlikely to find anything resembling the caliber of what Sterling complains about. I cannot remember, for the life of me, a single "asset flip" I have ever seen, outside of Sterling's videos complaining about them. Now, I have found some pretty painfully low-quality games, but those were rare. Still, I might have forgotten something, so I hopped on the Discovery Queue to test it. Most of the games were games from actual companies, and all of them clearly had some effort put into them. In two 12-game Discovery Queues, I found
one game that looked like an obviously shitty game by someone who didn't know how to make a game. Even this looks better than most of the crap Sterling talks about, as if it were everywhere on Steam.
Now, not every game I found was a winner, and I could find three or four other games that didn't seem like a well-made, quality, experience. But even then, with four terrible games out of 24, that's not even a fifth of what you find. And you know what I did about those games? I ignored them, because I'm capable of accepting a universe where not every game on Steam has the same polish as I have come to expect from most games on other platforms. This is all anecdotal, and doesn't really mean anything. If someone claimed their queue was full of shit, I can't argue against it. But as far as I'm concerned, Sterling spends his free time checking Steam's new releases for something terrible enough for him to sperg about. Because the very fact that the games exist is an affront to his tastes.
