Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Okay looks like I had the :optimistic: dialled up too high and the :autism: detector too low. Although it wouldn't surprise me if there are creeper stories from his blue jeans bandit days.

I think the "blue jean bandit" was another campus weirdo and that the discussion of John started later in the thread.
 
Alright so I'm braced for a tidal wave of well deserved :optimistic: and :autism: with a sprinkling of :dumb: but when he says "gave a blowjob to" I'm assuming he means "cybersex roleplay blowjob"

Also since he never met John, the mention of the trans issues makes me think(wish/hope) that this is John pretending to be "Brianna" over the internet (maybe he hadn't picked that name yet, which is why the victim didn't notice earlier??) and roleplaying his tranny fantasy with a minor.
Given the previous pages had John creeping on someone's twitter, cybering with a way-too-young dude wouldn't be that far outside the realms of plausibility.
I can imagine homo-John pretending to be a woman and subtly introducing trans-shit into the conversation because it got him off.
:powerlevel: I knew a chick that was a lowdown lesbo that cybered with people as a dude and it all got hugely messy when she did it to someone else I also knew and they bought it wholesale. Shit happens like this way more often than normal people think.

That said I've drank half a bottle of cheap whisky tonight so who fuckin knows, rate me autistic. I can take it.
 
Laying the foundations for the next scam already, are we John?

ogre.png


Good thing you hired all those coloured women instead and gave them the experience they deserved...just kidding, you hired one middle aged white man and paid him almost nothing.

reject.png
 
Last edited:

Poor old Warren. He was the only person who had the slightest interest in working for her, and she shits on him because her lazy ass couldn't put together even the basic strategy of a campaign. I wonder if we're going to see consulting fees in the new FEC filing, Wu certainly could use someone telling her what to do because she's been absolutely clueless so far.


Wu keeps talking like she's actually an entrepreneur. She's never worked in a startup environment. Giant Spacekat wasn't a startup, it was a vanity project. There was no proper schedule, no need of one because the money would continue to flow while Frank was employed. Wu fucked around hiring rank amateurs to produce Socially Unconscious Version 5 or whatever she's up to, it was terrible and sold incredibly poorly.

Talking like she's some marketing genius is belied the tides of red ink associated with every Wu endeavour.
 
"There's not enough time in an election"?? This sand-nigger threw his hat in the ring before the 2016 election winners were even sworn in. How much more time does he need?

Doesn't matter how much time you give Wu, she's always going to do her homework the night before it's due.
Speaking of which, where's the FEC report, John?
 
Doesn't matter how much time you give Wu, she's always going to do her homework the night before it's due.

If there's one thing his life makes absolutely clear, it's that John ain't never done his damned homework -- metaphorical or literal -- not the night before or any other time.
 
What's Johnny's follower to like ratio again?
It's always been horrendous once you remove the outlier tweets where he either paid to get them featured or his pals pushed it all over their blogs.

Twitter Audit isn't perfect, but you can see Brianna's here. John's fake follower count has increased since the last time I checked his stats but, for the most part, his followers are real. That should make his pathetic like ratio even more embarrassing because it suggests that either his followers have him muted (which people have admitted to) or they just don't give a shit about his activity.
 
But John aren't you concerned that there might be at least one person in the crowd who is pro-life? You'll need to burn the whole stadium down to purify it, inshallah

View attachment 492867

I have to sperg about this a little bit. Those are actually really bad seats, and only someone who doesn't really go to baseball games would think they're good.

If you're close to the field, you want seats either on the 1st or 3rd base sides, ideally behind the dugout of whichever team you're pulling for. This gives you a great overview of the entire infield, while also being able to watch the pitcher/batter duel unobstructed because you have a side view and can see both the pitcher and batter clearly.

Alternately, if your goal at the game isn't so much the baseball, but rather the ambiance, the crazy fans, chatting with warmup pitchers, etc, then you might try to get a seat in the outfield. Center field positions are usually bad (depends on the park, really), but left/right field are usually really fun and there's a lot of drinking and partying going on out there.

But no matter WHAT you're trying to do, sitting directly behind home plate is probably the worst place for it. Those are objectively bad seats.
 
I have to sperg about this a little bit. Those are actually really bad seats, and only someone who doesn't really go to baseball games would think they're good.

If you're close to the field, you want seats either on the 1st or 3rd base sides, ideally behind the dugout of whichever team you're pulling for. This gives you a great overview of the entire infield, while also being able to watch the pitcher/batter duel unobstructed because you have a side view and can see both the pitcher and batter clearly.

Alternately, if your goal at the game isn't so much the baseball, but rather the ambiance, the crazy fans, chatting with warmup pitchers, etc, then you might try to get a seat in the outfield. Center field positions are usually bad (depends on the park, really), but left/right field are usually really fun and there's a lot of drinking and partying going on out there.

But no matter WHAT you're trying to do, sitting directly behind home plate is probably the worst place for it. Those are objectively bad seats.

Anyone who intentionally buys the very pricey seats behind the home plate netting is not a serious baseball fan and is wasting money.

Sounds like the Wu's to me.
 
Anyone who intentionally buys the very pricey seats behind the home plate netting is not a serious baseball fan and is wasting money.

Frank: "Which seats should we get, honey?"

Bri: "Just buy the most expensive ones. Those have to be the best - and even if they're not, at least I get to let everyone know we have the priciest seats!"
 
Back