Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Jews have spoken
H-jPTCX_EV2rEkJornt1cXENvFo9Z93-j7xsX-Yarck.jpg
Everything is a threat or an insult to the jews and everybody is out to get them. Of course if you and a loud, seemingly large majority are an obnoxious group of litigious assholes it should come as no surprise that people will want to kick your ass.
 
Last edited:
They were gonna screech regardless of who won. I 100% guarantee you they had protest signs made with EVERY running choice nomination's name on it.

I was rooting for Amy, but I'll take anything to see these wasted tears.
I prefer a furor over the inocuous ones myself. Same thing as with the last guy. Screaming at someone who’s been remarkably evenhanded regarding your shit in the past is a great way to turn people against you.
 
Last edited:
I was watching the news with my sister and she said "Oh great, now this horrible man will be on the supreme court". I chuckled to myself. Then the newscaster started talking about how some conservatives don't like him because he isn't anti-abortion. She said "Wow, that's interesting"

She knew absolutely nothing about him, but was sure he was horrible. And I'm sure she's told other people about how horrible he is, because the news told her so.
 
I was watching the news with my sister and she said "Oh great, now this horrible man will be on the supreme court". I chuckled to myself. Then the newscaster started talking about how some conservatives don't like him because he isn't anti-abortion. She said "Wow, that's interesting"

She knew absolutely nothing about him, but was sure he was horrible. And I'm sure she's told other people about how horrible he is, because the news told her so.
“How do you know he’s a nazi?”

“Cause he looks like one!”

Edit: does anyone have an article saying he’d defend Roe v Wade? The news articles I’m looking at either don’t have it or have it buried under “he’s an evil man”
 
Edit: does anyone have an article saying he’d defend Roe v Wade? The news articles I’m looking at either don’t have it or have it buried under “he’s an evil man”

From what I've heard he's never specifically outright said anything one way or the other regarding his intent or feelings towards it, but he has apparently said that he's not interested in making the court reverse itself (presumably unless pushed to by outside forces). Meaning that Roe v. Wade was a prior supreme court decision and he's prepared to abide by that.

The "He'll overturn Roe V. Wade!" is just the rhetoric, really, and I think it's what they were going to use no matter who Trump picked. It's just the latest in the desperate demographic pandering shifts. First it was illegals ("Trump wants to kick you out instead of making you citizens!"), that didn't get any traction. Then it was teenagers ("You should get to vote!"), everyone had a good laugh at that. Then it was illegals again ("Trump wants to put your children in cages instead of making you citizens!"), again not really going anywhere. So now that they've decided they're probably pants-on-head retarded enough to run Hillary again in 2020, they've decided to do a little pandering to the female vote.
 
Kavanaugh's position on abortion has been tea-leaf-reading based on a single decision he was involved with involving an illegal who wanted one (I forget the details,) general deference to "settled law," and partisan reeeeing as mentioned above. I don't think he's ever given a reliable opinion on it (and isn't likely to in the near future, if we're being honest. John Roberts believed in the "living Constitution" during his confirmation hearing, but that belief has been pretty thin on the ground since then.)
 
Probably the worst he would do is say it’s not a federal problem and toss it back to the states to decide, depending on the case presented. Which is equivalent to chaining women up and focibly using them as brood mares according to the internet.
 
Probably the worst he would do is say it’s not a federal problem and toss it back to the states to decide, depending on the case presented. Which is equivalent to chaining women up and focibly using them as brood mares according to the internet.

Fuckin' Tenth Amendment, how does it work? Nobody knows (certainly not the courts.)
 
Americans can't count to 10.
America invented and pays the maintenance for the modern world. Before we showed up on the scene it was nothing but tea drinking, colonizing various african states, and fighting each other for said african states. Also people died from idiotic plagues because the idea of medicine was basically "Poke them full of holes with dirty needles until all the bad fluids come out".

Everyone knows numbers didn't go past 5 until America invented the rest of the numbers. We used those to invent electricity, radio, cars, airplanes, space ships, computers, fricking laser beams, and a bomb that we could destroy the entire fucking planet with if we felt like it.

And we'll drag your sorry asses into the future with us, because it's boring being at the top alone.
 
We used those to invent electricity,

British (Gilbert proposed, Faraday utilised)


Italian (Marconi)


German (Daimler)

airplanes

Perfected by Germany during World War I

space ships

Because of German scientists (Operation Paperclip)

computers

British (Babbage)

fricking laser beams

I'll give you that one.

and a bomb that we could destroy the entire fucking planet with if we felt like it.

With help from many European scientists.
 
Back