I've always found it amusing how MOGAI genders/sexualities describe basic ass human emotions and the people who claim those labels think they're super special for having really common feelings. Like "queerplatonic" people not understanding the concept of a best friend or "demisexual" people not understanding that there's plenty of people who don't want to have sex with people they don't know/like.
But Stephanie takes it to a whole new level. Lot's of people find things fascinating/sexy that they don't want to actually do, like all those middle aged women reading 50 Shades, so "aego" is completely unnecessary. Like why do you need a label for "I am okay with other people having sex" it's not pertinent to you at all in the slightest. Everyone has times where they're tired or nauseous or in pain and they don't want to have sex so "wooland" is unnecessary as well. I guess Stephanie thinks everyone else is just constantly horny and willing to fuck no matter how tired or ill they are. "Cease" falls in that same idea. Sometimes people just aren't in the mood for everything all the time. I'm bisexual and sometimes I want to look at girl porn and sometimes I want to look at boys. It doesn't mean I need an extra label for having a preference sometimes.
"Noeti" is exactly how
@80's Dad put it: "the outrageous idea of actually liking someone for their personality." A very large portion of the planet experiences this. It's called love, Stephanie. You don't need a label for it. "Feminfernal" and "hellgender" are just lame as fuck. But for someone who is supposedly not a woman she really likes to align herself with women. This includes "aurafemxenine."
When you cut out all that unnecessary stuff, "propest" and "paro" get dropped really easily because they're just "uwu I am so complex." "Xum" is stupid because of course you're going to feel dissatisfied with your endless search for the
perfect label. Just take a basic, broad label and accept that every human on this planet has nuances to their feelings. "Xenic" and "cassgenital" are just extra speshul ways of saying enby.
The only label on that list that is even a little valid is "pansensual" but in her description she just describes what panromantic is. I've read your list Stephy and I feel I can give you a good, conclusive set of labels which describe your sexuality/gender but not your precious day-to-day feels. Here we go...
Asexual, Panromantic, Non-Binary. You could even go so far as to say "non-binary femme" but you're so anti-female (despite constantly presenting as one) that you would probably dislike calling yourself femme in a way people can understand.
Anyways that's the end of my long rant. She just has so many bullshit labels to go over. Sorry lmao