🐱 Interesting clickbait, op-eds, fluff pieces and other smaller stories

CatParty
102943266-caitlyn.530x298.jpg


http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/24/caitlyn-jenner-halloween-costume-sparks-social-media-outrage-.html

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...een-costume-labeled-817515?utm_source=twitter

It's nowhere near October, but one ensemble is already on track to be named the most controversial Halloween costume of 2015.

Social media users were out in full force on Monday criticizing several Halloween retailers for offering a Caitlyn Jenner costume reminiscent of the former-athlete's Vanity Fair cover earlier this year.

While Jenner's supporters condemned the costume as "transphobic" and "disgusting" on Twitter, Spirit Halloween, a retailer that carries the costume, defended the getup.

"At Spirit Halloween, we create a wide range of costumes that are often based upon celebrities, public figures, heroes and superheroes," said Lisa Barr, senior director of marking at Spirit Halloween. "We feel that Caitlyn Jenner is all of the above and that she should be celebrated. The Caitlyn Jenner costume reflects just that."
 
How low you have to be to get to the point of defending someone's right to jack off during work.
 
lol, they can't deport the Somali rapists because they already got Swedish citizenship. I thought the migrants have to sit through classes on women's rights and Western cultural norms regarding sexual relations before they can get citizenship.

It's nice the Swedes are doing the experiment of testing that SJW bullshit about the way to stop rape is ask rapists please stop raping people.
 
It's nice the Swedes are doing the experiment of testing that SJW bullshit about the way to stop rape is ask rapists please stop raping people.
Too bad we will never get to see the conclusive data behind the experiment because the Swedes are simultaneously fudging their rape stats to the max by redefining rape criteria to the point that "buyer's regret" now counts as statutory rape (ie, Julian Assange's case), not to mention purging demographic data from rape stats.
 
Jesse Camp was mentioned above. CBS has a more detailed article about Jesse Camp.
https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2018/07/23/mtv-vj-jesse-camp-missing/

According to police, Camp had some minor run-ins with the law in the Inland Empire over the past couple years. Just last Thursday, before the missing persons report was filed, an officer with Fontana Police contacted him behind a shopping center in an area frequented by homeless people.

“That’s the impression he had, that maybe Mr. Camp was possibly living out of a car and on the streets,” said Railsback.

Typical rich boarding school kid who ended up being a drug addict. The last time I remember seeing this guy was in a video of him on Skid Row It was New York . Although there are local stories of him hanging out in Skid Row apparently in the past. Considering he was hanging around Imperial Empire in motels, I bet he went on some drug binges and probably OD'd. That's all people do when they're living in motels out there. That's drug country.

And this is what he actually looks like now FYI:
Jesse-Camp.jpg


Jesse Camp in 2008 ordering drugs on camera:

Update: People are claiming they tracked him down and he wanted to be "left alone for a while." AKA went to go on a drug binge in a desert motel.
 
Last edited:
Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 1.33.25 PM.png
http://www.kuenselonline.com/youtube-helps-a-farmer-in-tsirang-to-manage-kiwi-farm/
Farmers wanting to try kiwi farming should visit Doonglagang in Tsirang where farmer Kalyan Mahat has an orchard of the high-end cash crop.

It’s a lush green farm. Kiwi, both red and Hayward is planted among oranges and cardamom.

The farmer planted about 300 saplings in three acres of land in 2015. Today, the trees are heavy with fruits.

Kalyan said that commercial fruit-bearing period is after five years of plantation but he is expecting to harvest at least 10,000 kiwis this year. Kiwi (imported) is today available for Nu 50 a piece in the market.

The 44-year-old father of two left his grocery and electronic business to start commercial horticulture farming in 2015. “Horticulture farming is far better.”

Kalyan first brought saplings from Ilam in Nepal after seeking permission from the Department of Agriculture.

He said he relied on Youtube for the technical methods of kiwi plantation and management.

He explained that to plant kiwi, it needs the ratio of nine female and a male. “The plant and its branches are supported by a trellis. Success and failure of kiwi farming depends on how you manage.”

Kalyan said that prior to kiwi plantation, more than half of his land remained barren. The main source of income for his parents, citrus, was fast dying of citrus greening.

His father, Santa Bahadur Mahat, said that kiwi may be a high-end fruit but it has not grown in Bhutan so far.

He said he did not support his son initially because investing in a new cash crop was not wise. “The lush fruiting proved me wrong.”

The family bought additional three-acre land in the neighborhood to plant more kiwi plants. Besides kiwi, they also grow avocado, dragon fruit, ground apple, strawberry, cardamom and citrus among others.

Kalyan explained that for a farmer, planting at least 100 saplings and managing them well would fetch an income of Nu 900,000 a year. “That’s keeping an average of 50kg fruit per plant, which usually bears at least 100kgs in five years if managed well,” he said.

He has been encouraging his neighbors to try growing at least a set but to no avail.

Expecting others to join him, he has started kiwi nursery as well. A set of Hayward sapling is available for Nu 3,500.

Although Kalyan has raised red kiwi nursery, he isn’t authorised to sell without approval from the agriculture ministry. The ministry is carrying out a study of red kiwi cultivation in the country.

A report is expected to be released soon.
I love the phrase "kiwi nursery."
 
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/23/...-us-down-the-path-to-tyranny-sachs/index.html

The United States was born in a revolt against the tyranny of King George III. The Constitution was designed to prevent tyranny through a system of checks and balances, but in President Trump's America, those safeguards are failing.

Donald Trump holds the grandiose belief that only he should rule America. Unchecked by cowed or complicit Republicans in Congress, Trump invokes executive authority to alter policies and practices long established by law and treaty.

Days after his summit meeting with Vladimir Putin, no one knows what the two autocrats agreed to, or even talked about -- not the President's top aides, nor the Pentagon, nor security establishment or Congress, never mind the rest of us. And in the midst of the ensuing uproar, Trump has invited Putin to Washington, without telling his top intelligence official and no doubt most other key aides and officials.

The list of one-man actions grows rapidly. Trump is single-handedly imposing hundreds of billions of dollars of tariffs -- that is, taxes -- on imported goods from key US allies and China, without any explicit or implicit Congressional backing.

Trump abrogated the Iran nuclear deal despite its unanimous support by the UN Security Council. Trump is in the process of imposing new and severe sanctions against Iran, including the cutoff of all of Iran's oil exports, against the international agreement with Iran and with no vote of Congress, presumably to try to topple the Iranian regime.

Not surprisingly, and perhaps as intended, Trump's drumbeat of belligerency triggered an ominous warning from Iran, and now an escalation from Trump, casting the increasingly ominous confrontation with Iran as yet another one-man Trump show.

Trump used executive authority without Congressional mandate to impose a travel ban on several Muslim-majority states; to announce the US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement despite treaty-bound US obligations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change; and to change the status quo regarding Jerusalem against the will of the UN Security Council and UN General Assembly. Trump extended the stay of US troops in Syria without oversight or approval by Congress.

Political scientists are documenting America's descent toward one-man rule. A recent ranking of democracies around the world by the Swedish academic think-tank the V-Dem Institute put the US at the 31st position in 2017, a precipitous fall from 7th place in 2015. According to the report, "There is clear evidence of autocratization [the movement towards one-person rule] on several indicators.

"The lower quality of liberal democracy stems primarily from weakening constraints on the executive."

Similarly, the Democracy Index of The Economist Intelligence Unit now ranks the US only as a "flawed democracy."

Trump supporters argue that Trump is merely using his legal authority to the fullest. Yet the situation is worse than that. Simply by invoking the phrase "national security," Trump can push the Congress and Supreme Court to give him almost any degree of latitude. Trump's tariffs (under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962), the travel ban and his abrogation of the Iran nuclear deal were all made under the incantation of national security.

The Supreme Court, by a 5-4 majority, upheld the travel ban because the majority refused to second-guess the President on a claim of national security. Congress is almost completely supine on matters that the President declares to be about war and peace.

The Constitution is not supposed to work this way. Under Article I, Section 8, the power to wage war rests with Congress. So does the power to levy taxes and tariffs. Yet in each case, an aggressive President may invoke national security to circumvent the Congress. Congress's chronic failure to oversee presidential war-making, prolonged troop placements and overseas bases, with this president and earlier ones, is similarly notorious.

And Congress's failure to challenge Trump on his claims that Canada's steel and aluminum exports or China's consumer product exports constitute a "national security threat" is unforgivable.

Two long-term trends are at play, both exploited by Trump in his grab for power.

The first is the relentless growth of the national-security state since World War II, with America's hundreds of military bases and nonstop war-making around the world, including covert wars and influence campaigns run by the CIA. For more than half a century, Congress and the Supreme Court have tended to give presidents an almost free hand in starting wars, which are checked only later by the gradual mobilization of public opposition.

The second is the rise of corporate power in driving federal policy. As presidents implement the corporate agenda, Congress stands back. The Supreme Court, starting in the 1970s and continuing under Chief Justice John Roberts, has also championed the corporate lobby, giving the President a wide berth in promoting the corporate agenda. The Congress, in thrall to corporate lobbies, is complicit in letting the President unilaterally dismantle environmental and consumer-protection regulations.

Not all is lost. Special Counsel Robert Mueller and lower courts may still stand up to the President, even though the Supreme Court has become a predictable 5-4 backer of almost limitless presidential authority. Trump's assertion of power would also be counteracted if the Democrats win at least one of the chambers of Congress in November.

Yet these are fragile reeds. The US may well be one major war away from the collapse of American democracy, most likely a war with Iran for the regime change that Trump seeks.

The Nazi henchman Hermann Göring explained in Nuremberg prison how easy it is to mobilize the public to war: "Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

Trump has started with a trade war, but we shouldn't be surprised if the trade war morphs into a hot one. We are far down the path to tyranny.
 
:story:
I honestly wish he was tyrannical to the nth degree because, only then, would people understand what tyranny is.
He should start acting like drug cartels. Kidnap cops and families, skin them alive, and rip out their hearts and force feed them to other family members
 
Days after his summit meeting with Vladimir Putin, no one knows what the two autocrats agreed to, or even talked about -- not the President's top aides, nor the Pentagon, nor security establishment or Congress, never mind the rest of us. And in the midst of the ensuing uproar, Trump has invited Putin to Washington, without telling his top intelligence official and no doubt most other key aides and officials.
I like how people are freaking out a lot when Trump meets Putin but not much if he meets Kim Jong-un.
Similarly, the Democracy Index of The Economist Intelligence Unit now ranks the US only as a "flawed democracy."
Is the US even a democracy?
 
Days after his summit meeting with Vladimir Putin, no one knows what the two autocrats agreed to, or even talked about
They talked about how CNN is fake news.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Lysol
Back