Pixiv Banning Lolis - Because of police warnings

  • Thread starter Thread starter MW 002
  • Start date Start date
M

MW 002

Guest
kiwifarms.net
Pixiv “Banning Loli Because of Police Warning
August 2, 2018
149 Comments
by Ri
Pixiv have reportedly forced a lolicon artist to make his works “private” on the basis of accusations that they “contained sexual acts involving children”, offering by way of explanation only the claim that “recently internet monitoring has been strengthened.”

According to the artist, about 70 of his works were made private after receiving a message from Pixiv:

Pixiv-Artist-Message-Loli-Content-2-600x283.jpg


Pixiv-Artist-Message-Loli-Content-1-600x688.jpg


This is a message regarding a contributed work from Pixiv’s executive office.

We received a report from a third party organization that your submitted work contains sexual acts involving children. The corresponding works were made private.

Monitoring of the internet has become stronger recently, and the Internet Hotline Center, operating under the auspices of the National Police Agency, has been requesting measures for the prevention of the distribution of certain content. We ask for your understanding.

That is all, thank you.

The Internet Hotline Center is an NPO which apparently acts on reports from the public about “harmful” information found online, and according to its own secret criteria then reports the information to internet filters and the police, and makes quasi-legal demands that domestic hosts take the information down.

One Twitter user however believes this to have been a case of someone misusing the Internet Hotline Center’s report form, pointing out that the form explicitly states it is for reporting sexual acts “involving actual persons under the age of 18”:

Pixiv-Artist-Message-Loli-Content-3-600x574.jpg


However, other users reported finding other examples of randomly deleted/”privated” lolicon material, suggesting it may be a more widespread issue:
[/URL]
The incident will surely have many wondering whether or not this was Pixiv trying to stealthily censor inconvenient content without making waves – that is if the message is real and represents actual deliberate policy in the first place

Source: https://www.sankakucomplex.com/2018/08/02/pixiv-banning-loli-because-of-police-warnings/

TL;DR: Child porn is banned from Pixiv
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is lolicon even illegal? It's sick, but is it actually illegal under US law or not?
No, it is in no way, shape or form illegal unless it's impossible to tell whether or not it's real (which is a very rare instance of legislators actually futureproofing legislation in a way that makes sense.)
Some people also claim that it may be illegal to make a pornographic drawing depicting a real minor, which is one of the things that got Shadman in trouble. IANAL, but I highly doubt it.
 
Is lolicon even illegal? It's sick, but is it actually illegal under US law or not?

It's legal in the US as long as it doesn't depict real children, as far as I know. I think you can get slapped with some charges if you make a convincing image of a real kid getting fucked, though. (Although that one guy did draw a bunch of pictures with Trump's kid waving his tiny dick around so maybe that part is enforced loosely?)

Edit: like 4 people answered this while I was typing, god damn why are we all so familiar with the laws concerning loli porn
 
Sounds like a special interest org at work, the U.S. has had similar groups working to push other issues using convenient reinterpretations of laws, often for a good cause. I wonder why it took this long for the JP equivalents to mobilize.

No, it is in no way, shape or form illegal unless it's impossible to tell whether or not it's real (which is a very rare instance of legislators actually futureproofing legislation in a way that makes sense.)
I think some states have relevant laws that otherwise prohibit it, generally aimed at big traffickers/hosts.
 
It's legal in the US as long as it doesn't depict real children, as far as I know. I think you can get slapped with some charges if you make a convincing image of a real kid getting fucked, though. (Although that one guy did draw a bunch of pictures with Trump's kid waving his tiny dick around so maybe that part is enforced loosely?)

Edit: like 4 people answered this while I was typing, god damn why are we all so familiar with the laws concerning loli porn
Because we love to push the envelope?
 
I think some states have relevant laws that otherwise prohibit it, generally aimed at big traffickers/hosts.
If you're going to go to jail on kiddy porn charges, it's worth your money to fight it all the way to the Supreme Court, and even if you're poor, you can probably get pro bono representation of some sort. From there, it's going to be a really easy win. Blanket bans on categories of cartoon porn because some dipshit state legislator got all "think of muh children" are the exact reason SCOTUS exists.
Of course, you could almost certainly just win in state supreme court too.
 
Is lolicon even illegal? It's sick, but is it actually illegal under US law or not?

Not in Australia, but everywhere else it's mostly legal... kind of. The police in the US could, in theory, use it as just cause to get a warrant to search and seize your shit and then if they uncovered actual pedo stuff (most likely if the person has loli crap), then they would bust 'em.

I don't know what Pixiv plans to do though, because as far as I know loli/pedo content is like... almost ALL of their content. I mean, it's basically the premiere pedo and weird ass fetish art site on the web.
 
Mmm, Mad Thad is a good example...

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/thaddeus-mcmichaels-madthad0890.9665/

He was posting loli crap and running at the mouth about pedo shit, which I believe they then used to get a search warrant and then they found actual child porn on his computer via that search.

So if you ONLY have pedo art you're okay as long as you're not in Australia (where you can be arrested for Simpson porn), but you better damn well hope you don't have anything more than that. And, even then, you're playing with fire because they could still potentially search and seizure your stuff and... good luck getting it back! Even if you're not guilty of anything they will make it impossibly hard to ever see your stuff again and, even if you do, it likely isn't going to be one piece.
 
Good. Pixiv has tons of great art done by tons of great professional artists, and I hate to see its reputation be dragged down by the unyielding amount of loli/toddlercon fetish shit that pervades itself all throughout the site.

You may say -- "Oh, just turn R-18 off." But you don't understand -- Tons of these fuckers don't enable that filter on their art. It's a plague.
 
Is lolicon even illegal? It's sick, but is it actually illegal under US law or not?

Depends of the state, i remember some macro where people can see where they can get import their degeneracy without the FBI knocking your door

Good. Pixiv has tons of great art done by tons of great professional artists, and I hate to see its reputation be dragged down by the unyielding amount of loli/toddlercon fetish shit that pervades itself all throughout the site.

This is not the first time, but the backlash for some reason is always hilarious, Pixiv is just a more cool and unaffected by SJW version of DeviantArt, at least they are not straight out deleting fucking everything, hell there are porn artist that straight put worse things that loli in the platform and even put the DMM.com link so you can buy the complete version, loli is just the most vanilla you can find there
 
Back